TravelBanter

TravelBanter (http://www.travelbanter.com/index.php)
-   USA & Canada (http://www.travelbanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   SA2004 New York to Orlando:Wahington 95 or 295? (http://www.travelbanter.com/showthread.php?t=19025)

April 4th, 2004 01:49 PM

SA2004 New York to Orlando:Wahington 95 or 295?
 
Take a look at the TIME to drive between these two routes. You probably are
set up on Delorme to take the QUICKEST route, and Delorme seems to be
showing you a trip of 10 minutes less time than Street Atlas. You can make
the comparison easily on Delorme by just moving a "via" position back and
forth between I-95 / I-295.



"Christian" wrote in message
...
Hi all,

I try to setup the route from New York to Orlando using Street Atlas
2004. Between Baltimore and Washington, the map Street Atlas
application is choosing 295 as route and go to South of Washington
When I did the same think using Microsoft Streets&Trips or Mapquest
(web), the route was set 95, at North to Washington, and not 295.
I am not familiar with these routes.
Do you know why SA2004 suggest me to use 295? Even I do a via route on
95, the application go back to 295 at next exit.

Thanks a lot,
Chris




[email protected] April 4th, 2004 04:08 PM

SA2004 New York to Orlando:Wahington 95 or 295?
 
In sci.geo.satellite-nav wrote:
Take a look at the TIME to drive between these two routes. You probably are
set up on Delorme to take the QUICKEST route, and Delorme seems to be
showing you a trip of 10 minutes less time than Street Atlas. You can make
the comparison easily on Delorme by just moving a "via" position back and
forth between I-95 / I-295.


Assuming that you are talking about Microsoft Streets&Trips verses Delorme
Street Atlas, both programs have a quickest/shortest option.

I find that Street Atlas takes the "shortest" too literally, dropping from
freeway to city streets to cut off a couple of tenths, wandering through a
residential neighborhood to shave distance instead of following the freeway
to an interchange with another freeway.

Street Atlas 2004 provides correct routes for me, more so than SA7, but the
Streets&Trips route is often more reasonable, especially in rurual areas,
where non-freeways have 60mph speeds. It seems that S&T recognizes that,
where SA does not.

---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8-122.5



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
TravelBanter.com