2 weeks in London and Paris, 5 days Berlin, 4 days in Amsterdam, 4 days in Bussels
 

What do you think?

2 weeks in London and Paris, 5 days Berlin, 4 days in Amsterdam, 4 days in Bussels
 

Charlie Pink wrote:

What do you think?

Uh, um, fine.

David

--
David Horne- (website under reconstruction)
davidhorne (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk

2 weeks in London and Paris, 5 days Berlin, 4 days in Amsterdam, 4 days in Bussels
 

"Charlie Pink" wrote in message
om...
What do you think?

It's a bit cheap to say this: But I've heard Brussels is dull.

Also: You might want to see some of the country side as well. If tou skipped
Brussels you could rent a car and drive around in for instance Northern
France.

2 weeks in London and Paris, 5 days Berlin, 4 days in Amsterdam, 4 days in Bussels
 

On 19 Feb 2004 03:51:51 -0800, Charlie Pink wrote:
What do you think?

There is a lot more to Europe than big cities, unless you just really
really like big cities.

--
-BB-
To reply to me, drop the attitude (from my e-mail address, at least)

2 weeks in London and Paris, 5 days Berlin, 4 days in Amsterdam, 4 days in Bussels
 

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:45:57 +0100, Rasmus Lundbye wrote:


"Charlie Pink" wrote in message
om...
What do you think?

It's a bit cheap to say this: But I've heard Brussels is dull.

Also: You might want to see some of the country side as well. If tou skipped
Brussels you could rent a car and drive around in for instance Northern
France.

Talking dullness, I would rather stay around Brussels than go to Northern
France though.

2 weeks in London and Paris, 5 days Berlin, 4 days in Amsterdam, 4 days in Bussels
 

2 weeks in London and Paris, 5 days Berlin, 4 days in Amsterdam, 4 days in Bussels
 

On 21 Feb 2004 11:55:31 -0800, Iceman wrote:

Nearby Brugge, one of the best preserved
medieval towns, is a great place to visit, and a must if you're going
to the low countries. One day is enough for Brugge, and you can do it
easily as a day trip from Brussels.

Having visited at least a dozen towns and cities in Europe last summer,
Brugge is near the top of our list as one of the most enjoyable. I'd
recommend staying a couple of nights to have a full day, at least. Just
cruising around the canals on bicycles was fun.

And of course, Belgian beers are hard to beat! You can get Trappist brews
in the grocers for a Euro, which sell for $3.50-4.00 here.

--
-BB-
To reply to me, drop the attitude (from my e-mail address, at least)

2 weeks in London and Paris, 5 days Berlin, 4 days in Amsterdam, 4 days in Bussels
 

Sounds like a good time, but many prefer Munich over Berlin. Try to
squeeze in Barcelona and/or Prague.



(Charlie Pink) wrote in message . com...
What do you think?

2 weeks in London and Paris, 5 days Berlin, 4 days in Amsterdam, 4 days in Bussels
 

"Iceman" schreef in bericht
m...
(Charlie Pink) wrote in message
. com...
What do you think?

4 days Amsterdam is too much unless you want to smoke. There's the
Van Gogh Museum and the Rijksmuseum and not much else.

That's nonsense. I have lived in Amsterdam for the last 16 years and I still
haven't been to all items on my list. And I don't smoke.

Sjoerd

2 weeks in London and Paris, 5 days Berlin, 4 days in Amsterdam, 4 days in Bussels
 

In article , Iceman
wrote:


Personally, I found Vienna and Munich to be more rewarding than
Berlin, unless you're particularly interested in World War II or the
Cold War.

4 days Amsterdam is too much unless you want to smoke. There's the
Van Gogh Museum and the Rijksmuseum and not much else.

I thought Brussels was worth seeing

Obviously these are all very personal choices, but there's definitely a
LOT more to Amsterdam than just the two museusms!!! Give me Amsterdam
over Brussels any time of the year, any day of the week! I love
Amsterdam, and I don't smoke.

I also think Berlin is fascinating - maybe just a bit more so than
Munich. Hard to pick as I liked both, but 4 days in Berlin was too
short for me, and two days in Munich was probably just okay (though
another day wouldn't hurt..).

-Vicky