In article ,
"PTRAVEL" posted:

Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote in message
...

In article ,
"PTRAVEL" posted:
. . .
". . . it was not an act of terrorism."

Flying a plane into a building is terrorism but
crashing an automobile into an airport and setting
it on fire isn't?

Not if there's no political purpose behind the act. One lunatic
committing mayhem isn't a terrorist, only a criminal.

Were the 9-11 attacks acts of terrorism? If so, what was the
"political purpose" (using your qualification) related to them,
and if any, how are you privy to the intentions of the terrorists?

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti