View Single Post
  #81  
Old January 20th, 2004, 03:34 AM
DN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal


"Tchiowa" wrote in message
om...
SNIP

That's kind of neat, *nothing about opposition to socialism*


That's right. The definition of fascism has nothing to do with
opposition to socialism, as you tried to claim. Your somewhat silly
attempt to imply that anyone opposed to socialism must be a fascist
kind of fell on its face.


Phewww. It must be that American dictionary that got into that organ of
yours, loosely described as a brain (all dictionaries talk the same language
on this one). I tried to claim nothing sport. It might wear with others you
argue with on this ng , but don't come the old acid with me, suitably making
assertions and using a mirror, to turn the facts and/or opinions to your own
limited experience on the subject. Without wanting to press the matter still
further, these comments will apply by default to all the other comments that
you have made on this post.

SNIP

Go ahead. But they have nothing to do with that definition. Quick
twist in the train of logic to duck out of what you said.


Bugger me; here you go again. See above.

SNIP


Why do we have to keep traipsing to Washington because policy
protection of the farmers in the USA? AND this is Capitalism at work


No it is not. Protectionism is not capitalism. In fact, free trade or
protected trade have nothing to do with capitalism one way or another.


OK; if protected trade has nothing to do with capitalism, *who* owns it then
as a tool ?

Further, *IF* protection of trade was totally abolished, all controls on
how you farm and manufacture lifted, then prey, do tell us about gluts and
famines and how you propose they are to be managed. Would you care to look
at past history for a guide, or do you have some magic potion to apply to
the wound?

SNIP

I am in your debt for that little homely. But you really are on shakey
ground. Have you forgot for instance a fellow called Joh who ran his

State
without abuse ?


Who cares? You're ducking out of the issue.


No, No a thousand times no. But suffice it to say, you have plenty to go on
above and I would respect your scholarship if you came to order and deal
with the questions yet unanswered, on the previous two posts. Let's have a
tidy debate, or go home.

DN