View Single Post
  #8  
Old September 22nd, 2007, 05:21 PM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada
proffsl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default Driver Licensing not about highway safety

On Sep 19, 4:46 am, "Alohacyberian" wrote:
"James Silverton" wrote in message
Alohacyberian wrote on Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:55:26 GMT:


A "proffsl" wrote in message
groups.com...
?? Driver Licensing serves no purpose for highway safety that
?? laws against endangerment did not already serve, and
?? instead only serves fiscal greed.
??
A I don't agree, but, driver licensing is here to stay. Might
A as well get used to it. If it were fiscal greed, it would
A cost a couple hundred dollars to get a license. License
A information also helps solve a lot of crimes, offer
A identification and let others know that the people with the
A licenses had to provide some proof that they were somewhat
A competent to drive motor vehicles. KM


You could probably make a case against car license plates too! At one
time, you could get used to the pattern in a state. which facilitated
reading quickly. It's much more complicated now in my state of MD. We have
ABC123, 1AB C23, 123M456, M12345, vanity plates, private organizational
plates like UMD 1234 and I don't know what else. They don't even issue new
plates unless you ask for them or, sometimes, buy a new car but it's a
healthy hunk of change each year for the little plastic sticker!


James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland


Yes, license plates, stickers and registrations are a much better example of
fiscal greed than are driver licenses. I suppose the original poster may be
sour-grapes because s/he had a license revoked and probably for good reason.


Typical Ad Hominem responce. Instead of discussing the issue at hand,
you'd rather discuss your suppositions about the writer.

Ad Hominems are a sign of mental sloth behavior.