View Single Post
  #16  
Old March 3rd, 2004, 04:24 AM
Dr. Jai Maharaj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TERRORIST ATTACK ON AIRPORT IN HAWAII

In article ,
"PTRAVEL" posted from
adsl-69-105-125-1.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net:

Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote in message
...


In article ,
"PTRAVEL" posted:


Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote in message
...


In article ,
"PTRAVEL" posted:
. . .
". . . it was not an act of terrorism."


Flying a plane into a building is terrorism but
crashing an automobile into an airport and setting
it on fire isn't?


Not if there's no political purpose behind the act. One lunatic
committing mayhem isn't a terrorist, only a criminal.


Were the 9-11 attacks acts of terrorism?


Obviously.


By which definition?

If so, what was the
"political purpose" (using your qualification) related to them,
and if any, how are you privy to the intentions of the terrorists?


Bin Laden and Al Qaeda's political aims have been publicized for years -- do
you really not know? They oppose the American presence in Saudi Arabia, the
influence of the West in Muslim nations, and Israel -- their desire is to
provoke a holy war between Islam and "infidel" nations.


What is the evidence (not speculation, however on-target
it is) of a political purpose behind the 9-11 attacks? Do
you know something that the 9-11 commission hasn't found
yet? There are news reports that Pakistan financed the
attacks; what evidence is there to back up your claims?
Above, you refer to a "holy war" -- now that is
religious, not political. Are you not confused about
what you claim? Or do you possess specific information
about the 9-11 attacks that the government needs to know
from you?

Facts about terrorist Islam and Muslims:

http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti