On Sep 23, 8:11 am, Dave Smith wrote:
proffsl wrote:

"The streets belong to the public and are primarily for the use
of the public in the ordinary way." -- Packard v. Banton, 264
U.S. 140 (1924) - http://laws.findlaw.com/us/264/140.html#144

If you can't beat them baffle them with bull**** eh. That article
says nothing about driver licences.

"Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from
one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of
personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or
through the territory of any state is a right secured by the 14th
Amendment and by other provisions of the Constitution."
- Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S. 270 (1900) -
http://laws.findlaw.com/us/179/270.html#274

Nor does this one.

Nothing baffling or bull**** about it. Combined in their meaning:
We have the Right of Locomotion ordinarily used for personal
travel on our public highways.

What is the Locomotion ordinarily used for personal travel on
our public highways these days? Driving the Automobile, of course.

Nothing baffling about that. No bull**** either. Just a simple FACT.

I noticed you cut this portion out. We have the Right of Locomotion
ordinarily used for personal travel on our public highways. What is
the Locomotion ordinarily used for personal travel on our public
highways these days?


Our public highways were built on our property with our money
for the purpose of enhancing and increasing the exercise of our
Right of Liberty. But, as our public highways are being made
more and more unusable by anything but the Automobile, the
more this LIE that Driving is a Privilege makes us ALL Prisoners
of Privliege behind bars of blacktop.

Perhaps you can find the section of the Constitution that provides
for the right to drive a car.

Perhaps you can find the section of the Constitution that provides
for the Right to "write articles about our Right to Drive safely". No?
Would you then presume I don't have this Right?

Since our Constitution doesn't spicifically recognize my Right to
"write articles about our Right to Drive safely", do you presume I
don't have this Right?


Have you ever read the 9th Amendment to the Constitution?

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

But, isn't that EXACTLY what you're are attempting to do, to construe
it to deny or disparage other Rights retained by the people? YEP!!!

The Constitution isn't intended to define the limit of Rights retained
by the people, but instead it is intended to define the limits of
Powers delegated to government.

Perhaps you can find the section of the Constitution that delegates
to government the authority to deny people of their Right of Locomotion
ordinarily used for personal travel on our public highways?

Perhaps you missed the part about locomotion not meaning driving a car.

I know full well what Locomotion means. Locomotion is the act of
removing one's self from one place to another according to their own
inclination.

The court case in Williams vs. Fears defines the act of Locomotion as
"to remove from one place to another according to inclination".

Meriam-Websters defines Locomotion as: "an act or the power of moving
from place to place"

We have the Right of Locomotion ordinarily used for personal travel on
our public highways. What is the Locomotion ordinarily used for
personal travel on our public highways these days?