View Single Post
  #28  
Old March 3rd, 2005, 08:14 PM
PeterL
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chris Blunt" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 02:03:07 GMT, michael wrote:



Chris Blunt wrote:

Its reasonable to assume that the vast majority of offenders would be
Cambodian since they make up all but a very tiny proportion of the
population.



by your "reasoning" we can assume that the vast majority of happy pizza
consumed on sisowath quay is consumed by cambodians... my gut instinct
tells me this is idiotic... but, hey, assume away...


Of course not, but your comparison is invalid because Happy Pizza is a
business that few locals would be likely to visit because of its
relatively high prices.


We are talking about child porn as a business. They are not giving locals a
discount.

Child sexual abuse is not something carried
out by any particular economic, social or racial group.


Certainly economic group. E.g. those who can afford to pay for it. That
is, not locals.


Most research
on the subject says that the majority of children affected are abused
by someone they know - either a family member or someone close to the
family. The majority of offenders in Cambodia are Cambodians, just as
the majority of offenders in any country are locals of that country.
Trying to push the blame onto outsiders does nothing to address the
real problem, but has a lot to do with getting foreign funding for
NGO's and the government.

Chris