On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:23:43 -0800, Gunner Asch wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:06:06 +0000 (UTC), bill
wrote:


Then you can provide those claimed mistakes were actually erronious
and not actually mistakes at all...but your "source" was trying to
cover up the fact that armed citizens were involved in helping the
police.

Trot them out if you would be so kind.

Ill be waiting with amused interest.

I already gave it, and it's the same book that Wikipedia gives.

The Battle of Stepney, Colin Rogers

Please note that on the page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Si...detectives.jpg

There's a picture of the house on fire.

No sign of artillery damage at all...

Odd..I cant see if there is any or not. Small bore arty was common in
1911 Under 1" was very common

No it wasn't, not in UK domestic service anyway.

There may have been the odd 'pom pom' about but that wouldn't have been
available in London.


Which reminds me...you claimed they were shooting .380s


Nope.

Re-read.

7.65 Mauser, a bottle neck pistol cartridge.


--
William Black

Free men have open minds
If you want loyalty, buy a dog...