"Pan" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 09:00:41 GMT, "alohacyberian"
wrote:
"Dave Patterson" wrote in message
...
This is absolutely the wrong group for such
a posting. Besides, if Nader had not run for
President last time, there wouldn't be a
President Bush to impeach.

A president cannot be impeached unless he's committed an impeachable
offense.
And you can rest assured that had Bush committed any impeachable offenses,
his adversaries would have immediately moved for impeachment. KM

Even to the extent the Democrats are Bush's adversaries and not his
supine lapdogs, they don't have control of either House of Congress,
so don't be an idiot. This is the wrong group to argue about such
things... snipped by a friendly mohel

Then why are you arguing in this newsgroup? KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website there are 3000 live cameras or
visit NASA, play games, read jokes, send greeting cards & connect
to CNN news, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards or learn all
about Hawaii, Israel and mo http://keith.martin.home.att.net/