On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:11:01 +0000, Keith Willshaw wrote:


"Oelewapper" wrote in message
...

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...

A less than credible story I fear.




Well then, if they are guilty: why let the Guantanamo Britons go ???


Becasue there is insufficient evidence to prove before
a court that they are guilty.

What about most of the other ones? In most cases, the same should apply
too, shouldn't it?

Short answer: because they aren't Brits.

Not really human, or at least it seems they don't qualify for basic human
rights, or something like that. Good old US double standard, or what?