"devil" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:11:01 +0000, Keith Willshaw wrote:


"Oelewapper" wrote in message
...

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...

A less than credible story I fear.




Well then, if they are guilty: why let the Guantanamo Britons go ???


Becasue there is insufficient evidence to prove before
a court that they are guilty.

What about most of the other ones? In most cases, the same should apply
too, shouldn't it?


The indications are that the remaining British prisoners
will be tried

Short answer: because they aren't Brits.

Not really human, or at least it seems they don't qualify for basic human
rights, or something like that. Good old US double standard, or what?


Those that are citizens of Arab countries and Afghamistan may well prefer
Guantanamo to what happens if they are repatriated.

Keith