Dave Baker wrote:
On 15 Mar 2006 05:17:17 -0800, "Tchiowa" wrote:

maxwell wrote:

What Thaksin's
various transfers of assets accomplished (besides enriching himself and his
family and cronies) was to show to the world that he's above the law.
Why? He didn't pay taxes because the law said he didn't have to.

Which law? The one that was changed 2 days beforehand? Mere coincidence to
your buffalo mentality! :-)

And you also neglect to remember that his son/proxy DID get caught breaking
the law.

Dave

The law was amended in accordance to the constitution, so what is wrong
with the amendment even if it was amended on the same day?

His son had also paid the fine for what he had done.