On 18 Jan 2007 08:06:13 -0800 in rec.travel.cruises, "ghostship"
wrote:

In a legal document submitted in response to a suit filed by Mitchell,
Princess lawyer Brooke Oliver said the cruise line may not have made
any money at all because of costs associated with framing, shipping,
storage and insurance. And she contended that distribution of the fakes
"has enhanced plaintiff's prestige and reputation and the value of her
artwork."

tough ****. a copyright violation is a copyright violation.
those slimeballs at princess just don't want to pay either the
artist or the victims of their fraud.

but what do you expect from felon corporations?

================================================== ===========
If you want to see the real Alaska, don't come on a
cruise ship! See the cruise industry rogue's gallery
at http://www.cruisejunkie.com/#Environmental_Issues

Dennis P. Harris