On Sunday, February 3, 2013 2:06:48 PM UTC-5, JohnT wrote:
"Robert Cohen" wrote in message

...

Southwest knows a little about running economical airline, thus i'll

hereby illogically intrudea, a convicted kibbitzer if not grouchy

cheap-butt gadfly



Surely it's been enough tested and is considered not profitable, but that

was perhaps during the brunt of the darn recession, but now ... perhaps

the passenger volume may be substantively better



The price of car fuel is so variable, and sometimes it does seem to make

air travel by itself as the valid alternative, but then requires $ for

transportation/car rental though baggage ha$$le is famously not so on

southwest



In what language is the above?



--

JohnT

eclectic Oxbridgean, Shakespearian, upper crude, and certainly mainline street car philly are as much affectations as the semi terrific twaddle above that you
enjoy sarcastically if not facetiously dead panning

so tell me the function of a postulation, that it's not
supposed to be more than slightly confesssional, wretchedly self-deprecating, semi non-humorous in conveying half fried ideas and dangling sentence fragments

the idyll/idealism of unlimited freedom for semi literates is to make boarish asses of selves which isn't exactly why rational atomic bomb fearers in a previous century designed indestructible communication playground, because
when doomsday arrives, there can be infinite tweets

which for better if not worse subsequently/consequentially has actually taken some of the total out of totalitarianism, perhaps more than years of cold and limited, futile, absurd wars

pesterors can be as ridiculous as i wannabe