On Apr 12, 10:42*am, (Poetic Justice) wrote:
charnoir wrote;

http://www.deepjournal.com/p/7/a/en/137
html [Snip]
http://www.counterpunch.org/2004/06/17
how-reagan-armed-saddam-with-chemica
-weapons/ [Snip]

So your *fact cites* are from 2 private citizens both with a bias,
agendas, etc and on the fringe of society?

www.deepjournal.com/p/7/a/en/137.html

"Personal meeting between Saddam and
Rumsfeld American poison gas for
Saddam,..."
"American Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld took care of it that American
companies started to deliver poison gas to
Iraq."

It's one person's article that he wrote and posted on his own website.

So?


*It is only his *claim* which he doesn't back-up with *facts*, as there
are none to support his two statements or he would have used them.

You expect the government to accept responsibliety for that?



I could put up a website and claim that Rumsfeld and Saddam were lovers,
that doesn't make it a fact.

What personal website? Neither Deep Journal or Counterpunch are
personal web istes!


Do you not understand the difference?

I understand the US government willl not put up a web site admitting
to that!


That man Daan de Wit is intelligent and successful (media, books) in the
Netherlands.

But he is also a conspiracy nut and a 9/11 Truther, you think he's a
good source for you to cite just because it supports what *You* want to
believe?

..