Trip report Tanzania
In article , John Macdonald
writes
In message , Geir
writes
On 2005-10-22 14:29:51 +0200, "Rydale" said:
They are Fuji slide film, scanned and with minimal processing such
cropping and levels adjustment. Two have had the odd blade of grass
removed but essentially they are out of the camera.... which
incidentally is Canon with a range of lenses, most notably a 500mm IS.
--
John Macdonald
This is not a photo group, but still: Having seen your images this is
an argument for going back to the roots, so to speak. Do you think you
would have gotten the same results with digital?
I think it makes little difference, but to bring it back on topic, both
film and digital pose their own problems when it comes to travelling for
some weeks in a hot dusty environment.
For the record I should also say the underwater pictures are digital!
So 500mm zoom...
Yes, well, if you want bird photography. You must have had a tripod or a
stand, surely, your pix are pin-sharp.
May I add my voice to those who find your pictures excellent. The
underwater pictures are so colourful it's shocking really. And some of
your compositions like the giraffes or the buffaloes are almost as if
they're posing for you.
Have you considered submitting them to an online photo library?
--
JohnM
|