Debunking Liberal Myths About Tax Cuts and the Economy
On Dec 12, 9:18*pm, mg wrote:
According to your figures revenue as a percent of gdp was 20. 6% in
2000 and 17.6% in 2008.
,
gdp was 9.8 tril in 2000 and 13.1 tril in 2008.
..
this means revenue was 2.0 tril in 2000 and 2.3 tril in 2008.
..
Since the exchecquer pays for stuff in dollars and not in % of gdp was
he better off with the 2.0 tri under Clinton *or the 2.3 tril under
Bush?
..
Was the private sector better off with its after tax residue of 7.8
tril under Clinton or 10.8 tril under Bush?
..
You just might need a course in remedial arithmetic
..
Those are not my figures. Those figures are from the Tax Policy
Center.
You broadcast that you desperately need a course in remedial
artihmetic based on your interpretation of those figures
|