View Single Post
  #8  
Old April 23rd, 2006, 05:50 PM posted to rec.travel.air
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default NY TIMES: The Humble Valujet No More

beavis wrote:

James Robinson wrote:

... they were the first airline to extensively contract out
maintenance. Something done in many other industries, I might add.
There was an accident, which arguably wasn't the fault of the airline
management, and were then considered as "unsafe".


Please. They contracted things out to SabreTech because they were
CHEAPER, simple as that. Their subcontractor cut corners, and 110
people died as a result. ValuJet wasn't DIRECTLY responsible, no, but
they were most certainly at fault for using a shady contractor.


Are you implying that dealing with the lowest bidder is somehow wrong?
It is the way business is done. Everything from computer programming to
moon landers is awarded to the lowest qualified bidder as a normal
contracting process. SabreTech was a licenced aircraft maintenance
supplier.

As far as SabreTech being "shady", they were properly licensed by the
FAA to perform aircraft maintenance. It's not as though they were some
back lot garage that repairs cars using stolen parts.

Also, please describe how the accident was as a result of Sabretech
"cutting corners". The airline prohibited the shipment of hazardous
material, and weren't aware that the oxygen generators were aboard. The
maintenance contractor made a mistake in not discharging the generators
or applying safety caps. It was more a mistake than a deliberate act to
save money.

Blaming the airline, even partially, is like blaming Ford Explorer
drivers for Firestone tire failures: They shouldn't have bought them,
therefore they are at fault.

Further, the cabin-to-cockpit interphone had been deferred, meaning
the cabin crew had no way to communicate the fire to the flight crew
other than yelling through the cockpit door.

So yes, Valujet shared a great deal of responsibility for the crash.


The lack of interphone communication was not cited in the NTSB report as
either a cause of the accident or even aggravating the conditions. It
was a side issue, and ValuJet was perfectly legal in flying the aircraft
without the interphone according to the FAA-approved Minimum Equipment
Lists.