Kansas City Is Not A Steak

Group: rec.travel.usa-canada Date: Tue, Oct 12, 2004, 10:15pm (EDT+4)
From: OSPAM (JamesStep)
the place to go for what Kansas City is
known for "Steak".
A guide book said so?? Who wrote it?
I'm not trying to take the side of the original poster here, as I think
his condemnation of Kansas City restaurants based on one bad experience
was silly.

Ok, so I maybe went a little far by making this statement. Scottdar


However, the restaurant in question apparently does have a good
reputation, based on a couple reviews I've seen.
For example, Frommers says: "This popular steakhouse was established in
1949 ... and is still the place for ... some of the best, yet
affordably-priced, steaks in town, aged and cut on the premises and
broiled over a hickory-charcoal flame..."


Unfortunately, I learned from a patron that the restaurant had changed
owners many times over. Scottdar


It's too bad he had a disappointing experience there, but that can
happen sometimes even at good places.





I just wouldn't have thought that people could be so outright mean on a
comment I make. You just expect people to be a little nicer. Scottdar
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Remove "NOSPAM" from my address when sending me e-mail.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-