A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travelling Style » Air travel
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

BA flies 747 on 3 engines LAX-UK - New EU comp rules



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 27th, 2005, 04:58 PM
nobody
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BA flies 747 on 3 engines LAX-UK - New EU comp rules

"Dave C." wrote:
OK, tell ya what. We'll put you in the captain's chair of a 747 at 29,000
feet out over the middle of the Atlantic Ocean somewhere and make sure that
you run out of fuel. I'll bet you'll have a real warm fuzzy feeling then
knowing that your plane can glide for several minutes. -Dave



In the case of the Air Transat plane, one tank emptied itself fully
within 15 minutes, so they decided to cross feed from the other tank and
while doing so, didn't check the gauges and were then surprised to find
the other tank was now also empty within 15 minutes (the pumps were
essentially dumping the fuel overboard). The crew made many mistakes
including cross feeding, and not monitoring fuel once cross feed was opened.

In the case of this British Airways flight, fuel tank depletion would
have been at a steady continuous rate, and proper monitoring would
reveal how much further they can go before they are too low on fuel. If
they were 100% sure of making it to Ireland, 80% sure to Manchester and
60% sure to London, then they could proceed to Ireland over the atlantic
without issue, and there, re-evaluate fuel situation and decide if there
is enough to go to Manchester or London.

Furthermore, from LA to the Atlantic, the crew would have seen how the
plane performs and if anything else broke, and this would have given
them a good idea that the plane could go on for a few more hours. The
crossing of atalantic at northern latitude woudl have been much shorter
than going from lax to the shores of atlantic.
  #2  
Old February 27th, 2005, 05:09 PM
nobody
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dave C." wrote:
Ummmm . . . the pilots did EXACTLY that. They thought they'd have enough
fuel, but somewhere over the ocean they realized that they were burning fuel
faster than they thought they would. The time to figure out that you don't
have enough fuel is long before you have nothing but sea water beneath
ou. -Dave


The atlantic is crossable on a route that doesn't bring you more than 60
minutes from an airport. Whether this flight used such a route or not i
don't know, but at northern latitudes, the distances to cross the pond
are even shorter.

Aircraft had sophisticated fuel gauges and computers that allow the crew
to know pretty accurately how much their have, and how much their are
consuming per minute at current rates. At regular intervals in the
flight, they calculate this and ensure that they have enough to make it
to 1- next airport, 2-destination.

Even with fully functionlaing engines, the crews have to regularly make
fuel checks during the flight and constantly recalculate their remaining
range, distance to next emergency airport etc.

Had they miscalculated while over the USA, they would have realised this
well before they ran out fo fuel and would have plenty left to get to
the next airport along the route.
  #3  
Old February 27th, 2005, 05:12 PM
nobody
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC" wrote:
1) Fly to Hawaii, lose and engine, have to descend to a lower altitude
(single-engine service ceiling, called drift-down).


If you dont like the answer, take the train.


How long does Amtrak take between Los Angeles and Hawaii ? Is the tunnel
glassed so yo can see the fishes and coral ? Is there a restaurant car
on board ? At night, do they have bright spotlights to illuminate the
seafloor so you can continue to admite the coral and fishes, or is it
very dark ?
  #4  
Old February 27th, 2005, 06:16 PM
grandpa bear
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

people
i was into flying 15 years ago they had
747 before that they are geting old yes
BUD











BEARS PAW = CAPTAIN BUD-



  #5  
Old February 27th, 2005, 06:29 PM
Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nobody wrote:

"Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC" wrote:
1) Fly to Hawaii, lose and engine, have to descend to a lower altitude
(single-engine service ceiling, called drift-down).


If you dont like the answer, take the train.


How long does Amtrak take between Los Angeles and Hawaii ? Is the tunnel
glassed so yo can see the fishes and coral ? Is there a restaurant car
on board ? At night, do they have bright spotlights to illuminate the
seafloor so you can continue to admite the coral and fishes, or is it
very dark ?


I dont know, usually I'm asleep at that point besides, its too dark to see
out...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am BillGatus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assim
[General Protection Fault]
  #6  
Old February 27th, 2005, 06:29 PM
Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nobody wrote:

"Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC" wrote:
1) Fly to Hawaii, lose and engine, have to descend to a lower altitude
(single-engine service ceiling, called drift-down).


If you dont like the answer, take the train.


How long does Amtrak take between Los Angeles and Hawaii ? Is the tunnel
glassed so yo can see the fishes and coral ? Is there a restaurant car
on board ? At night, do they have bright spotlights to illuminate the
seafloor so you can continue to admite the coral and fishes, or is it
very dark ?


I dont know, usually I'm asleep at that point besides, its too dark to see
out...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am BillGatus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assim
[General Protection Fault]
  #7  
Old February 27th, 2005, 07:42 PM
James Robinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

grandpa bear wrote:

people
i was into flying 15 years ago they had
747 before that they are geting old yes
BUD


You don't think perhaps they have come up with some newer models since
then? It's like saying Mercedes Benz are old because I drove one that
was built 125 years ago.
  #8  
Old February 27th, 2005, 07:54 PM
Bertie the Bunyip
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nobody
sednews:1109523360.a6c1a6e24e440024bd47b1f817167f1 c@teranews:

"Dave C." wrote:
Ummmm . . . the pilots did EXACTLY that. They thought they'd have
enough fuel, but somewhere over the ocean they realized that they
were burning fuel faster than they thought they would. The time to
figure out that you don't have enough fuel is long before you have
nothing but sea water beneath ou. -Dave


The atlantic is crossable on a route that doesn't bring you more than
60 minutes from an airport.


Less, even.

Bertie
  #9  
Old February 27th, 2005, 07:54 PM
Bertie the Bunyip
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nobody
sednews:1109523360.a6c1a6e24e440024bd47b1f817167f1 c@teranews:

"Dave C." wrote:
Ummmm . . . the pilots did EXACTLY that. They thought they'd have
enough fuel, but somewhere over the ocean they realized that they
were burning fuel faster than they thought they would. The time to
figure out that you don't have enough fuel is long before you have
nothing but sea water beneath ou. -Dave


The atlantic is crossable on a route that doesn't bring you more than
60 minutes from an airport.


Less, even.

Bertie
  #10  
Old February 27th, 2005, 10:55 PM
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bertie the Bunyip XZXZ@XZXZ.,XZXZX writes:

The atlantic is crossable on a route that doesn't bring you more than
60 minutes from an airport.


Less, even.


Even when burning far more fuel than normal?

When you are burning more fuel, you need to find a shorter route, not a
longer one. But one that is guaranteed to be close to airports is more
likely to be long than short.

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BA flies 747 on 3 engines LAX-UK - New EU comp rules Bertie the Bunyip Air travel 26 February 28th, 2005 05:52 PM
BA flies 747 on 3 engines LAX-UK - New EU comp rules Capt 'Wild' Bill Kelso, USAAC Europe 14 February 28th, 2005 05:52 PM
BA flies 747 on 3 engines LAX-UK - New EU comp rules nobody Air travel 42 February 28th, 2005 12:09 AM
BA flies 747 on 3 engines LAX-UK - New EU comp rules nobody Europe 6 February 27th, 2005 10:53 PM
BA flies 747 on 3 engines LAX-UK - New EU comp rules nobody Europe 5 February 27th, 2005 09:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.