If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health.
Saturday in early August several infirm elderly people seated
themselves in middle emergency exit row seats on a Southwest Airlines 737 at Seatac Airport. In my experience this is not at all unusual. Southwest uses a first-come, first-seated boarding rule. Infirm elderly board before ordinary passengers and get first seat pick. The middle emergency exit row seats are preferred by some of them because of extra leg room. This time a passenger informed one of the cabin crew that he did not think an elderly woman sitting at an emergency exit could handle that exit in case of an emergency. Additionally, there was baggage sticking out from under a seat into her aisle. The crew member went forward and returned with the pilot. She then explained that the elderly woman was perfectly OK where she was as long she was willing to handle her exit hatch in an emergency. The answer as to whether that woman was strong enough to handle her exit hatch was not mentioned. She also explained that passengers were allowed to place any baggage they wanted to under any seat. I was, and continue to be, incredulous about that crew member's ignorant explanations. The pilot did not say a word. She and the pilot then went forward. Several minutes later she returned, and the original informing passenger was lead away forward and out of the plane. He returned alone several moments later, collected his belongings, and departed the plane. I have given this curious incident much thought since then. Here are my current passenger safety conclusions: 1. This ongoing practice of allowing the infirm elderly to sit at the middle emergency exits in Southwest airliners is hazardous. It contravenes current federal passenger safety regulations. In this instance, that elderly woman did not appear anywhere near strong enough to handle her emergency exit hatch. She would have been a serious obstacle to clearing that exit for others in case of an emergency. This situation is simply unacceptable. 2. Allowing baggage to stick out into the middle emergency exit row aisle is also hazardous. It directly contravenes current federal passenger safety regulations. 3. There were only three cabin crew members on this plane. If there had been an emergency requiring the use of emergency exits, those three would have been fully occupied with the fore and aft emergency exits. None of the three would have been available to instruct and assist the people in the middle emergency exit rows. 4. The pilot had a duty to correct the crew member's ignorant explanations and the two passenger safety hazards. He did not. That means he was fundamentally irresponsible about his passenger's safety. Therefore I conclude flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health.
No airline has any kind of test (physical or mental) to see if passengers
seated along the exit row can or cannot perform the required safety function, aside from some obvious cases (e.g. passengers with no arms, passenger using a wheelchair, etc.). Just because someone is old don't mean they are "infirmed". This is true of airlines that are first come first serve or have reserved seatings. They just informed the passengers seated in those rows about their obligations. If you feel unsafe, you can do as the other passenger, take another flight. wrote in message ... Saturday in early August several infirm elderly people seated themselves in middle emergency exit row seats on a Southwest Airlines 737 at Seatac Airport. In my experience this is not at all unusual. Southwest uses a first-come, first-seated boarding rule. Infirm elderly board before ordinary passengers and get first seat pick. The middle emergency exit row seats are preferred by some of them because of extra leg room. This time a passenger informed one of the cabin crew that he did not think an elderly woman sitting at an emergency exit could handle that exit in case of an emergency. Additionally, there was baggage sticking out from under a seat into her aisle. The crew member went forward and returned with the pilot. She then explained that the elderly woman was perfectly OK where she was as long she was willing to handle her exit hatch in an emergency. The answer as to whether that woman was strong enough to handle her exit hatch was not mentioned. She also explained that passengers were allowed to place any baggage they wanted to under any seat. I was, and continue to be, incredulous about that crew member's ignorant explanations. The pilot did not say a word. She and the pilot then went forward. Several minutes later she returned, and the original informing passenger was lead away forward and out of the plane. He returned alone several moments later, collected his belongings, and departed the plane. I have given this curious incident much thought since then. Here are my current passenger safety conclusions: 1. This ongoing practice of allowing the infirm elderly to sit at the middle emergency exits in Southwest airliners is hazardous. It contravenes current federal passenger safety regulations. In this instance, that elderly woman did not appear anywhere near strong enough to handle her emergency exit hatch. She would have been a serious obstacle to clearing that exit for others in case of an emergency. This situation is simply unacceptable. 2. Allowing baggage to stick out into the middle emergency exit row aisle is also hazardous. It directly contravenes current federal passenger safety regulations. 3. There were only three cabin crew members on this plane. If there had been an emergency requiring the use of emergency exits, those three would have been fully occupied with the fore and aft emergency exits. None of the three would have been available to instruct and assist the people in the middle emergency exit rows. 4. The pilot had a duty to correct the crew member's ignorant explanations and the two passenger safety hazards. He did not. That means he was fundamentally irresponsible about his passenger's safety. Therefore I conclude flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health.
AJC writes
It was on either Ryanair or easyjet that I noticed they dealt with this quite logically. If you needed preboarding, then you were not fit to sit in an exit row, simple as that. In my recent experience of airlines in Europe, they will not allow anything at all, even the smallest item to encroach on the floor space near an exit. Ryanair colour code the seats. If I remember rightly, most seats have a yellow headrest cover, but seats in exit rows have a red headrest cover. If you preboard, you're told by the cabin crew to pick any seat with a yellow headrest cover. -- Simon Elliott http://www.ctsn.co.uk/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health.
Peter L writes
No airline has any kind of test (physical or mental) to see if passengers seated along the exit row can or cannot perform the required safety function, aside from some obvious cases (e.g. passengers with no arms, passenger using a wheelchair, etc.). Just because someone is old don't mean they are "infirmed". This is true of airlines that are first come first serve or have reserved seatings. They just informed the passengers seated in those rows about their obligations. On one airline I travelled with some time ago, I was sitting in a row with a wing exit. A member of the cabin crew checked that I'd read the safety card and knew how to open the wing exit. This is the only time I recall this - I wonder why it isn't SOP? -- Simon Elliott http://www.ctsn.co.uk/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health.
"Simon Elliott" wrote in message news Peter L writes No airline has any kind of test (physical or mental) to see if passengers seated along the exit row can or cannot perform the required safety function, aside from some obvious cases (e.g. passengers with no arms, passenger using a wheelchair, etc.). Just because someone is old don't mean they are "infirmed". This is true of airlines that are first come first serve or have reserved seatings. They just informed the passengers seated in those rows about their obligations. On one airline I travelled with some time ago, I was sitting in a row with a wing exit. A member of the cabin crew checked that I'd read the safety card and knew how to open the wing exit. This is the only time I recall this - I wonder why it isn't SOP? It is. It's been done on all the SW and UA flights I have been on the last couple of years. But they don't have an agility test or mental test to see if you are capable of doing it. They asked, you said yes, and that was that. -- Simon Elliott http://www.ctsn.co.uk/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health.
Simon Elliott wrote:
AJC writes It was on either Ryanair or easyjet that I noticed they dealt with this quite logically. If you needed preboarding, then you were not fit to sit in an exit row, simple as that. In my recent experience of airlines in Europe, they will not allow anything at all, even the smallest item to encroach on the floor space near an exit. Ryanair colour code the seats. If I remember rightly, most seats have a yellow headrest cover, but seats in exit rows have a red headrest cover. If you preboard, you're told by the cabin crew to pick any seat with a yellow headrest cover. Is this because Ryanair passengers do not know how to determine an exit row without the headrest cover color. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health.
Peter L wrote:
It is. It's been done on all the SW and UA flights I have been on the last couple of years. But they don't have an agility test or mental test to see if you are capable of doing it. They asked, you said yes, and that was that. Even without a test, I would think that if you are disabled enough to require preboarding then you don't belong in the exit row. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health.
"mrtravel" wrote in message om... Peter L wrote: It is. It's been done on all the SW and UA flights I have been on the last couple of years. But they don't have an agility test or mental test to see if you are capable of doing it. They asked, you said yes, and that was that. Even without a test, I would think that if you are disabled enough to require preboarding then you don't belong in the exit row. Quite logical. I have not paid much attention, but next time I fly SW, I'll see if any of the pre-boarded passengers take the exit row. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Flying on Southwest Airlines may be hazardous to your health.
Peter L wrote:
Quite logical. I have not paid much attention, but next time I fly SW, I'll see if any of the pre-boarded passengers take the exit row. Do they let Elite flyers preboard? For WN, I refer to "elite" as those with the cards that let them take a guest free. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Driving in Kenya Can Be Hazardous to Your Health | Hans-Georg Michna | Africa | 0 | May 4th, 2004 07:03 AM |
Tips for flying America West for longtime Southwest customer? | This Old Man | Air travel | 8 | September 18th, 2003 12:12 AM |