If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
SWA to test assigned seating
In article ,
mrtravel wrote: Southwest doesn't have any -900s, and even if they did, the airline is not certified for ETOPS operations. Did I say WN had them? You left out the part where I said "I think WN would have no trouble picking them up if needed" This is a red herring. Why do you think they'd need -900s for ETOPS when they can certify their existing 737s instead? Do you think there would be a problem for WN to get certified? What do you think? Special training and certification for all pilots and mechanics, big change in engineering procedures, etc. etc. We are talking about an airline that had Boeing emulate old-style gauges in new-gen 737s so that they didn't need to re-train their pilots. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
SWA to test assigned seating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 mrtravel wrote: I know that the 737-900 is ETOPS. I think WN would have no trouble picking them up if needed. Additionally, I think WN could kick AA around in the Carribean. I hadn't thought about that one. I was more thinking of them competing with ASA on the Cancun/Cabo/Puerto Vallarta runs, but going up against AAL on their moneymakers from the east coast would really make it stick in their craw. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEmeXQyBkZmuMZ8L8RAo0HAJ9ky5UkTmNDKpalzLhvT7 OXA1qMQgCguqeB ezVs2r+mNM10v+tF9SA0v5I= =3Fyy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
SWA to test assigned seating
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:11:15 GMT, mrtravel
wrote: Southwest doesn't have any -900s, and even if they did, the airline is not certified for ETOPS operations. Did I say WN had them? You left out the part where I said "I think WN would have no trouble picking them up if needed" Do you think there would be a problem for WN to get certified? Why do you refer to Southwest as WN? Regards, Dianna _______________________________________________ To reply, please remove "fluff" from my address. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
SWA to test assigned seating
In article 36,
Joseph Coulter wrote: IIRC Piedmont used to fly to London in 737's Don't think that's possible. Piedmont had 737-200s and later -400s, the latter with a range of about 2150nm. Charlotte to London would be almost 4000nm, and would have far exceeded the 737's range. The service Charlotte to London Gatwick was in 767s in the late 1980's, before the creation of, and integration with, USAir in 1989. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
SWA to test assigned seating
Dianna Visek wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:11:15 GMT, mrtravel wrote: Southwest doesn't have any -900s, and even if they did, the airline is not certified for ETOPS operations. Did I say WN had them? You left out the part where I said "I think WN would have no trouble picking them up if needed" Do you think there would be a problem for WN to get certified? Why do you refer to Southwest as WN? Regards, Dianna They same reason I call Delta DL, United UA, and Aeroflot SU It's an air travel group, learn a bit. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
SWA to test assigned seating
WN is their IATA designator. (Like DL for Delta, NW for Northwest)
There's a list of designators here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IATA_airline_designator "Dianna Visek" wrote in message ... On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:11:15 GMT, mrtravel wrote: Southwest doesn't have any -900s, and even if they did, the airline is not certified for ETOPS operations. Did I say WN had them? You left out the part where I said "I think WN would have no trouble picking them up if needed" Do you think there would be a problem for WN to get certified? Why do you refer to Southwest as WN? Regards, Dianna _______________________________________________ To reply, please remove "fluff" from my address. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
SWA to test assigned seating
beavis wrote in
: In article 36, Joseph Coulter wrote: IIRC Piedmont used to fly to London in 737's Don't think that's possible. Piedmont had 737-200s and later -400s, the latter with a range of about 2150nm. Charlotte to London would be almost 4000nm, and would have far exceeded the 737's range. The service Charlotte to London Gatwick was in 767s in the late 1980's, before the creation of, and integration with, USAir in 1989. oops, forgot that they had "big" planes all I ever took were the little guys. -- Joseph Coulter Cruises and Vacations http://www.josephcoulter.com/ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Assigned vs. Open (Southwest) Seating | Timothy J. Lee | Air travel | 51 | September 23rd, 2005 06:54 PM |
Lance Armstrong and Tour de France | Tom | Europe | 50 | September 12th, 2005 11:22 PM |
WSJ: On Its Giant Plane, Airbus Tests Exits | sufaud | Air travel | 0 | March 22nd, 2005 08:17 PM |
Insurance fails to pay up. | Miss L. Toe | Air travel | 49 | November 10th, 2004 08:47 AM |
Insurance fails to pay up. | Miss L. Toe | Europe | 57 | November 10th, 2004 08:47 AM |