A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travelling Style » Air travel
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SWA to test assigned seating



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old June 22nd, 2006, 01:20 AM posted to rec.travel.air
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SWA to test assigned seating

In article ,
mrtravel wrote:

Southwest doesn't have any -900s, and even if they did, the airline
is not certified for ETOPS operations.


Did I say WN had them? You left out the part where I said
"I think WN would have no trouble picking them up if needed"


This is a red herring. Why do you think they'd need -900s for ETOPS
when they can certify their existing 737s instead?

Do you think there would be a problem for WN to get certified?


What do you think? Special training and certification for all pilots
and mechanics, big change in engineering procedures, etc. etc.

We are talking about an airline that had Boeing emulate old-style gauges
in new-gen 737s so that they didn't need to re-train their pilots.

  #12  
Old June 22nd, 2006, 01:35 AM posted to rec.travel.air
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SWA to test assigned seating

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

mrtravel wrote:

I know that the 737-900 is ETOPS. I think WN would have no trouble
picking them up if needed. Additionally, I think WN could kick AA around
in the Carribean.


I hadn't thought about that one. I was more thinking of them
competing with ASA on the Cancun/Cabo/Puerto Vallarta runs, but
going up against AAL on their moneymakers from the east coast would
really make it stick in their craw.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |

Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! |
http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEmeXQyBkZmuMZ8L8RAo0HAJ9ky5UkTmNDKpalzLhvT7 OXA1qMQgCguqeB
ezVs2r+mNM10v+tF9SA0v5I=
=3Fyy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  #13  
Old June 22nd, 2006, 01:44 AM posted to rec.travel.air
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SWA to test assigned seating

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:11:15 GMT, mrtravel
wrote:

Southwest doesn't have any -900s, and even if they did, the airline
is not certified for ETOPS operations.


Did I say WN had them? You left out the part where I said
"I think WN would have no trouble picking them up if needed"

Do you think there would be a problem for WN to get certified?



Why do you refer to Southwest as WN?

Regards, Dianna
_______________________________________________
To reply, please remove "fluff" from my address.
  #14  
Old June 22nd, 2006, 01:51 AM posted to rec.travel.air
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SWA to test assigned seating

In article 36,
Joseph Coulter wrote:

IIRC Piedmont used to fly to London in 737's


Don't think that's possible. Piedmont had 737-200s and later -400s,
the latter with a range of about 2150nm. Charlotte to London would be
almost 4000nm, and would have far exceeded the 737's range.

The service Charlotte to London Gatwick was in 767s in the late 1980's,
before the creation of, and integration with, USAir in 1989.
  #15  
Old June 22nd, 2006, 02:54 AM posted to rec.travel.air
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SWA to test assigned seating

Dianna Visek wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:11:15 GMT, mrtravel
wrote:


Southwest doesn't have any -900s, and even if they did, the airline
is not certified for ETOPS operations.


Did I say WN had them? You left out the part where I said
"I think WN would have no trouble picking them up if needed"

Do you think there would be a problem for WN to get certified?




Why do you refer to Southwest as WN?

Regards, Dianna


They same reason I call Delta DL, United UA, and Aeroflot SU
It's an air travel group, learn a bit.
  #16  
Old June 22nd, 2006, 03:10 AM posted to rec.travel.air
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SWA to test assigned seating

WN is their IATA designator. (Like DL for Delta, NW for Northwest)

There's a list of designators here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IATA_airline_designator


"Dianna Visek" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:11:15 GMT, mrtravel
wrote:

Southwest doesn't have any -900s, and even if they did, the airline
is not certified for ETOPS operations.


Did I say WN had them? You left out the part where I said
"I think WN would have no trouble picking them up if needed"

Do you think there would be a problem for WN to get certified?



Why do you refer to Southwest as WN?

Regards, Dianna
_______________________________________________
To reply, please remove "fluff" from my address.



  #17  
Old June 22nd, 2006, 03:16 AM posted to rec.travel.air
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SWA to test assigned seating

beavis wrote in
:

In article 36,
Joseph Coulter wrote:

IIRC Piedmont used to fly to London in 737's


Don't think that's possible. Piedmont had 737-200s and later -400s,
the latter with a range of about 2150nm. Charlotte to London would be
almost 4000nm, and would have far exceeded the 737's range.

The service Charlotte to London Gatwick was in 767s in the late
1980's, before the creation of, and integration with, USAir in 1989.


oops, forgot that they had "big" planes all I ever took were the little
guys.

--
Joseph Coulter
Cruises and Vacations
http://www.josephcoulter.com/

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Assigned vs. Open (Southwest) Seating Timothy J. Lee Air travel 51 September 23rd, 2005 06:54 PM
Lance Armstrong and Tour de France Tom Europe 50 September 12th, 2005 11:22 PM
WSJ: On Its Giant Plane, Airbus Tests Exits sufaud Air travel 0 March 22nd, 2005 08:17 PM
Insurance fails to pay up. Miss L. Toe Air travel 49 November 10th, 2004 08:47 AM
Insurance fails to pay up. Miss L. Toe Europe 57 November 10th, 2004 08:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.