A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travelling Style » Air travel
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AA 1586 LAX-YYX: blown tire. Emergency landing at LAX



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd, 2008, 08:44 PM posted to rec.travel.air
John Doe[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default AA 1586 LAX-YYX: blown tire. Emergency landing at LAX

AA 1586 from LAX to Toronto blew a tire on take off. Currently circling
LAX to burn fuel and will attempt emergency landing at LAX.

CNN entertainment network is carrying the story.
  #2  
Old September 2nd, 2008, 08:54 PM posted to rec.travel.air
John Doe[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default AA 1586 LAX-YYX: blown tire. Emergency landing at LAX

John Doe wrote:
AA 1586 from LAX to Toronto blew a tire on take off. Currently circling
LAX to burn fuel and will attempt emergency landing at LAX.


Landed safely at 12:52 local LAX time.
  #3  
Old September 2nd, 2008, 09:50 PM posted to rec.travel.air
Jim Davis[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 709
Default What's the rule for burning fuel? (WasAA 1586)


"John Doe" wrote in message
...
John Doe wrote:
AA 1586 from LAX to Toronto blew a tire on take off. Currently circling
LAX to burn fuel and will attempt emergency landing at LAX.


Landed safely at 12:52 local LAX time.


I'm wondering what the rule id for burning off fuel. On my flight from ORD
to IAH last Friday, we took off, and the landing gear jammed. We just
circled around and landed again. We were in the air for a total of about 45
minutes.


  #4  
Old September 2nd, 2008, 10:29 PM posted to rec.travel.air
Bob Myers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 204
Default AA 1586 LAX-YYX: blown tire. Emergency landing at LAX


"John Doe" wrote in message
...
John Doe wrote:
AA 1586 from LAX to Toronto blew a tire on take off. Currently circling
LAX to burn fuel and will attempt emergency landing at LAX.


Landed safely at 12:52 local LAX time.


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz............


  #5  
Old September 2nd, 2008, 10:32 PM posted to rec.travel.air
Bob Myers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 204
Default What's the rule for burning fuel? (WasAA 1586)


"Jim Davis" wrote in message
...

"John Doe" wrote in message
...
John Doe wrote:
AA 1586 from LAX to Toronto blew a tire on take off. Currently circling
LAX to burn fuel and will attempt emergency landing at LAX.


Landed safely at 12:52 local LAX time.


I'm wondering what the rule id for burning off fuel. On my flight from
ORD to IAH last Friday, we took off, and the landing gear jammed. We just
circled around and landed again. We were in the air for a total of about
45 minutes.


It's generally not a concern with fuel per se, but the maximum
weight at take off quite often exceeds the maximum landing
weight, so you burn off fuel until you get down below the limit.
Of course, if it were truly a get-this-thing-back-on-the-ground-
soonest sort of emergency, they'd go ahead and do that and
to hell with the weight limits - but you don't do that unless you
have to.

Bob M.


  #6  
Old September 2nd, 2008, 11:57 PM posted to rec.travel.air
DevilsPGD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 904
Default What's the rule for burning fuel? (WasAA 1586)

In message "Jim Davis"
wrote:


"John Doe" wrote in message
. ..
John Doe wrote:
AA 1586 from LAX to Toronto blew a tire on take off. Currently circling
LAX to burn fuel and will attempt emergency landing at LAX.


Landed safely at 12:52 local LAX time.


I'm wondering what the rule id for burning off fuel. On my flight from ORD
to IAH last Friday, we took off, and the landing gear jammed. We just
circled around and landed again. We were in the air for a total of about 45
minutes.


A blown tire may be different then landing gear which won't retract in
terms of landing weight, stability, and odds of catastrophic failure.

The big thing though, is that even under ideal circumstances, maximum
take-off weight is likely higher then the maximum landing weight, so the
difference in weight must be handled. Since passengers would complain
if they and their cargo were unloaded before landing, fuel is the
easiest solution.
  #7  
Old September 3rd, 2008, 06:43 AM posted to rec.travel.air
mrtravel[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 458
Default AA 1586 LAX-YYX: blown tire. Emergency landing at LAX

John Doe wrote:
AA 1586 from LAX to Toronto blew a tire on take off. Currently circling
LAX to burn fuel and will attempt emergency landing at LAX.

CNN entertainment network is carrying the story.


This isn't that uncommon. Must be a slow news day.
  #8  
Old September 3rd, 2008, 07:00 AM posted to rec.travel.air
John Doe[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default What's the rule for burning fuel? (WasAA 1586)

Jim Davis wrote:

I'm wondering what the rule id for burning off fuel. On my flight from ORD
to IAH last Friday, we took off, and the landing gear jammed. We just
circled around and landed again. We were in the air for a total of about 45
minutes.


Depends on how much fuel had been loaded on the plane (and how much
cargo/passengers). If it was for a short haul, the plane likely wouldn't
have full tanks and might be able to land right away because its total
weight would be below the allowable langing weight.

But for LAX-Toronto, this would be a fair distance for a 737 and likely
that its tanks were nearly full.

On a 737 (considering it doesn't have landing gear doors for the main
gears), would it have hurt to retract the gear with a possibly blown
tire and then continue to Toronto and make the dangerous landing there
with low fuel, instead of circling around for 3 hours going nowhere at
LAX ?
  #9  
Old September 3rd, 2008, 07:42 AM posted to rec.travel.air
mrtravel[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 458
Default What's the rule for burning fuel? (WasAA 1586)

John Doe wrote:
Jim Davis wrote:


I'm wondering what the rule id for burning off fuel. On my flight from ORD
to IAH last Friday, we took off, and the landing gear jammed. We just
circled around and landed again. We were in the air for a total of about 45
minutes.



Depends on how much fuel had been loaded on the plane (and how much
cargo/passengers). If it was for a short haul, the plane likely wouldn't
have full tanks and might be able to land right away because its total
weight would be below the allowable langing weight.

But for LAX-Toronto, this would be a fair distance for a 737 and likely
that its tanks were nearly full.

On a 737 (considering it doesn't have landing gear doors for the main
gears), would it have hurt to retract the gear with a possibly blown
tire and then continue to Toronto and make the dangerous landing there
with low fuel, instead of circling around for 3 hours going nowhere at
LAX ?


Don't AA have a big maintenance facility at LAX?
  #10  
Old September 3rd, 2008, 01:00 PM posted to rec.travel.air
jbdarmo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default What's the rule for burning fuel? (WasAA 1586)


"Bob Myers" wrote in message
...

"Jim Davis" wrote in message
...

"John Doe" wrote in message
...
John Doe wrote:
AA 1586 from LAX to Toronto blew a tire on take off. Currently circling
LAX to burn fuel and will attempt emergency landing at LAX.

Landed safely at 12:52 local LAX time.


I'm wondering what the rule id for burning off fuel. On my flight from
ORD to IAH last Friday, we took off, and the landing gear jammed. We
just circled around and landed again. We were in the air for a total of
about 45 minutes.


It's generally not a concern with fuel per se, but the maximum
weight at take off quite often exceeds the maximum landing
weight, so you burn off fuel until you get down below the limit.
Of course, if it were truly a get-this-thing-back-on-the-ground-
soonest sort of emergency, they'd go ahead and do that and
to hell with the weight limits - but you don't do that unless you
have to.

Bob M.



A few years ago on a return flight from SJU, shortly after takeoff, there
was smoke in the galley. We
have an emergency "heavy" landing with this NW Airbus 320. It ends up that
it was the pizza oven causing
the cardboard pizza to start burning..Looks like they cook like my wife!!

Joe




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SWA makes emergency landing at KOAK A Guy Called Tyketto Air travel 6 June 4th, 2007 05:21 PM
Holiday flight in emergency landing me Air travel 2 October 24th, 2006 05:49 AM
NWA jet makes emergency landing in Iran Fly Guy Air travel 5 June 23rd, 2005 09:36 AM
AAL MD-80 makes emergency landing at KORD A Guy Called Tyketto Air travel 0 September 17th, 2004 07:50 PM
SIA 777 makes emergency landing at YMML A Guy Called Tyketto Air travel 2 August 28th, 2004 11:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.