Teaching english in Europe with no degree but TEFL certificate?

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
JohnT writes:

I can understand that twins would both have an individual soul ...

Actually, they are independent entities. Only the bodies are
identical. However, the physical similarities and proximity do often
allow them to interact with each other in unusually intimate ways.

... but if
there is a large rock which somehow becomes split into two parts
(perhaps
with a sledgehammer or even being struck buy lightning), do both parts
of
what was previously one rock have individual souls too?

Rocks don't have souls in the usual sense. Consciousness doesn't even
reside spatially inside the rocks in the usual sense.


I am not entirely sure what is meant by "in the usual sense" in the context
in which you use it above. Do they have different genders, for example?

JohnT

Following up to Martin :


Rocks cannot live on lava bread alone.

Ouch!
--
Tim C.

"JohnT" kirjoitti
viestissä:ZLGdne6_CfN3c0nenZ2dnUVZ8tydnZ2d@eclipse .net.uk...

I am not entirely sure what is meant by "in the usual sense" in the
context in which you use it above. Do they have different genders, for
example?

Does it matter really? Don't you think this thread should die as soon as
possible.

Markku Grönroos wrote:

"JohnT" kirjoitti
viestissä:ZLGdne6_CfN3c0nenZ2dnUVZ8tydnZ2d@eclipse .net.uk...

I am not entirely sure what is meant by "in the usual sense" in the
context in which you use it above. Do they have different genders, for
example?

Does it matter really? Don't you think this thread should die as soon as
possible.

You're getting closer- have another one!

--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org

Following up to Martin :

On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:45:20 +0100, Tim C.
wrote:

Following up to Mxsmanic :

Tim C. writes:

snip to remove context

It seems clear that all these sources have some common
foundations, but actually getting through to those foundations is very
difficult.

I rest my case, m'lud.

He had the similar problem with a young woman in the Bois de Boulogne.

Hence his obsession with pantyhose?
--
Tim C.

Following up to (David Horne, _the_
chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h offy)
:

Does it matter really? Don't you think this thread should die as soon as
possible.

You're getting closer- have another one!

It'll just be reincarnated in another thread. Resistance is useless.
--
Tim C.

Tim C. wrote:

Following up to (David Horne, _the_
chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h offy)
:

Does it matter really? Don't you think this thread should die as soon as
possible.

You're getting closer- have another one!

It'll just be reincarnated in another thread. Resistance is useless.

I'm waiting for the MixiMarkku law of Usenet. Eventually, all threads
will converge with Markku calling Mixi a faggot.

--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org

Martin wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:41:33 +0000,
(David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and
prestwich tesco 24h offy) wrote:

Markku Grönroos wrote:

"Mxsmanic" kirjoitti
om...
Tim C. writes:

You believe them to be true because you got the idea from somewhere
else, and didn't think it up all on your own.

Most of my current theories are theories I developed myself, since
nothing I've read has been sufficiently comprehensive or plausible to
satisfy me. It seems clear that all these sources have some common
foundations, but actually getting through to those foundations is very
difficult.

It shouldn't be difficult to just vanish from the group.

No, please don't go Markku, you're so much _fun_.

Markku meant Mixi.

I know!

--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org

Martin wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:24:50 +0000,
(David Horne, _the_ chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and
prestwich tesco 24h offy) wrote:

Tim C. wrote:

Following up to (David Horne, _the_
chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn and prestwich tesco 24h offy)
:

Does it matter really? Don't you think this thread should die as soon as
possible.

You're getting closer- have another one!

It'll just be reincarnated in another thread. Resistance is useless.

I'm waiting for the MixiMarkku law of Usenet. Eventually, all threads
will converge with Markku calling Mixi a faggot.

He did that already some time ago.

In this thread? How could I have missed it!

--
David Horne- http://www.davidhorne.net
usenet (at) davidhorne (dot) co (dot) uk
http://homepage.mac.com/davidhornecomposer http://soundjunction.org

Mxsmanic wrote:

The Reid writes:

its not a who.

Then what is it?

Yes, correct. It is what, not who.
--
dgs