A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travelling Style » Air travel
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

hilton boycott



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old June 11th, 2007, 01:42 AM posted to rec.travel.air
Mike Jacoubowsky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default hilton boycott

"Your" board of directors? You're high-enough in the organization to know
about this, or care, and yet post from a throwaway el-cheapo net-zero
$9.99/month (or less) internet service.

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com


  #32  
Old June 11th, 2007, 01:49 AM posted to rec.travel.air
wolf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default hilton boycott

In article ,
"TMOliver" wrote:

"Craig Welch" wrote in message
...
Frank F. Matthews wrote:

It's more like even an LA sheriff known for letting celebrities and the
rich off easy can get caught in the light of enough publicity. The fact
that the scam didn't work in this case doesn't mean that it is not a
problem.


Does this particular sheriff have a name for letting the rich and famous
off?


Not really, but the *******'s so full of himself that he wears five stars on
his collar, egregious overkill


Can we assume that he's going to retire comfortably to foreign climes?


No, but my California daughter tells me he's one of those dreaded
Scientologists, a brand of faith which ought to be particularly offensive to
persons with naval interests, since the founder thereof attempted, while
holding a US Navy commission and as either officer in charge or CO of a
naval vessel in time of war, attempted a hoax/fraud for which he was
relieved. You may read L. Ron Hubbard's books, but his naval career was a
shameful fraud.

TMO


And he wasn't even in the Alabama National Guard.......?
  #33  
Old June 11th, 2007, 02:00 AM posted to rec.travel.air
Frank F. Matthews
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,362
Default hilton boycott



Shawn Hirn wrote:

In article ,
"Frank F. Matthews" wrote:


Craig Welch wrote:


TMOliver wrote:


"Craig Welch" wrote in message


Can we assume that he's going to retire comfortably to foreign climes?


No, but my California daughter tells me he's one of those dreaded
Scientologists, a brand of faith which ought to be particularly
offensive to persons with naval interests, since the founder thereof
attempted, while holding a US Navy commission and as either officer in
charge or CO of a naval vessel in time of war, attempted a hoax/fraud
for which he was relieved. You may read L. Ron Hubbard's books, but
his naval career was a shameful fraud.


No Scientologist should be allowed to hold public office.


Religious standards for office have gone out of favor.


Since when? Try getting elected to any political office in the United
States without being Christian or Jewish. I won't say it hasn't
happened, but compare the list of Judeo-Christian politicians to those
who are Buddhist, Hindi, Muslim, or atheist and then let me know if you
still feel that religious standards have gone out of favor in American
politics.



There is a difference between not being allowed to hold and being able
to convince folks to elect you.


  #34  
Old June 11th, 2007, 02:28 AM posted to rec.travel.air
Shawn Hirn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 773
Default hilton boycott

In article ,
"Frank F. Matthews" wrote:

Craig Welch wrote:

TMOliver wrote:

"Craig Welch" wrote in message



Can we assume that he's going to retire comfortably to foreign climes?



No, but my California daughter tells me he's one of those dreaded
Scientologists, a brand of faith which ought to be particularly
offensive to persons with naval interests, since the founder thereof
attempted, while holding a US Navy commission and as either officer in
charge or CO of a naval vessel in time of war, attempted a hoax/fraud
for which he was relieved. You may read L. Ron Hubbard's books, but
his naval career was a shameful fraud.



No Scientologist should be allowed to hold public office.


Religious standards for office have gone out of favor.


Since when? Try getting elected to any political office in the United
States without being Christian or Jewish. I won't say it hasn't
happened, but compare the list of Judeo-Christian politicians to those
who are Buddhist, Hindi, Muslim, or atheist and then let me know if you
still feel that religious standards have gone out of favor in American
politics.
  #35  
Old June 11th, 2007, 05:57 AM posted to rec.travel.air
Tchiowa
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default hilton boycott

On Jun 11, 8:28 am, Shawn Hirn wrote:
In article ,
"Frank F. Matthews" wrote:





Craig Welch wrote:


TMOliver wrote:


"Craig Welch" wrote in message


Can we assume that he's going to retire comfortably to foreign climes?


No, but my California daughter tells me he's one of those dreaded
Scientologists, a brand of faith which ought to be particularly
offensive to persons with naval interests, since the founder thereof
attempted, while holding a US Navy commission and as either officer in
charge or CO of a naval vessel in time of war, attempted a hoax/fraud
for which he was relieved. You may read L. Ron Hubbard's books, but
his naval career was a shameful fraud.


No Scientologist should be allowed to hold public office.


Religious standards for office have gone out of favor.


Since when? Try getting elected to any political office in the United
States without being Christian or Jewish. I won't say it hasn't
happened, but compare the list of Judeo-Christian politicians to those
who are Buddhist, Hindi, Muslim, or atheist and then let me know if you
still feel that religious standards have gone out of favor in American
politics.


Let's see. 90%+ of US people have a Judeo-Christian background.

People vote on who they agree with. People with similar backgrounds
are more likely to have similar positions on issues without having to
think about what religion they are.

  #36  
Old June 11th, 2007, 04:31 PM posted to rec.travel.air
Miguel Cruz[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default hilton boycott

wolf wrote:
Sure you can hate her. Personally I think she's a disaster. And where
did she get the gaul to declare herself a "role model for young women"
or this generations iconic blond.

NO reason to take it out on the Hilton shareholders and employees though.


I wouldn't weep too much for them. The "company" doing the "boycott"
sounds like it would be lucky to be responsible for financing one
weekend in a hotel per year.

miguel
--
Hit the road! Photos from around the world: http://travel.u.nu
Detailed airport information: http://airport.u.nu
  #37  
Old June 12th, 2007, 01:06 AM posted to rec.travel.air
Shawn Hirn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 773
Default hilton boycott

In article ,
Larry in AZ wrote:

Waiving the right to remain silent, "Frank F. Matthews"
said:

Craig Welch wrote:

TMOliver wrote:

"Craig Welch" wrote in message


Can we assume that he's going to retire comfortably to foreign
climes?


No, but my California daughter tells me he's one of those dreaded
Scientologists, a brand of faith which ought to be particularly
offensive to persons with naval interests, since the founder thereof
attempted, while holding a US Navy commission and as either officer in
charge or CO of a naval vessel in time of war, attempted a hoax/fraud
for which he was relieved. You may read L. Ron Hubbard's books, but
his naval career was a shameful fraud.


No Scientologist should be allowed to hold public office.


Religious standards for office have gone out of favor.

Since this situation is in the US such a condition would be
unconstitutional.


Scientology is not a religion. It's a cult of kooks claiming to believe
in some dopey science fiction...


What's the difference between a religion and a cult? Cults hasn't won a
popularity contest; whereas religions have.
  #38  
Old June 12th, 2007, 03:36 AM posted to rec.travel.air
Frank F. Matthews
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,362
Default hilton boycott



Craig Welch wrote:

Frank F. Matthews wrote:


Craig Welch wrote:

TMOliver wrote:

"Craig Welch" wrote in message


Can we assume that he's going to retire comfortably to foreign climes?


No, but my California daughter tells me he's one of those dreaded
Scientologists, a brand of faith which ought to be particularly
offensive to persons with naval interests, since the founder
thereof attempted, while holding a US Navy commission and as either
officer in charge or CO of a naval vessel in time of war, attempted
a hoax/fraud for which he was relieved. You may read L. Ron
Hubbard's books, but his naval career was a shameful fraud.


No Scientologist should be allowed to hold public office.


Religious standards for office have gone out of favor.

Since this situation is in the US such a condition would be
unconstitutional.


Indeed. But doesn't being nuts disbar one from public office?

Oops. Even as I typed that I thought of a couple of Presidents in recent
memory.


I think that in most jurisdictions in the US being involuntarily in a
mental hospital doesn't necessarily bar you from voting.

  #39  
Old June 13th, 2007, 10:51 AM posted to rec.travel.air
ant[_23_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default hilton boycott

TMOliver wrote:

No, but my California daughter tells me he's one of those dreaded
Scientologists, a brand of faith which ought to be particularly
offensive to persons with naval interests, since the founder thereof
attempted, while holding a US Navy commission and as either officer
in charge or CO of a naval vessel in time of war, attempted a
hoax/fraud for which he was relieved. You may read L. Ron Hubbard's
books, but his naval career was a shameful fraud.


eh? This is interesting, I'd not heard that before. What did Hubbard do,
exactly? Sounds like a good story.

Anyone who was named "L" by his parents was bound to turn out bad.


--
Don't try to reply to my email addy:
I'm borrowing that of the latest
scammer/spammer


  #40  
Old June 13th, 2007, 12:51 PM posted to rec.travel.air
ant[_23_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default hilton boycott

Shawn Hirn wrote:
"Frank F. Matthews" wrote:


Religious standards for office have gone out of favor.


Since when? Try getting elected to any political office in the United
States without being Christian or Jewish. I won't say it hasn't
happened, but compare the list of Judeo-Christian politicians to those
who are Buddhist, Hindi, Muslim, or atheist and then let me know if
you still feel that religious standards have gone out of favor in
American politics.


Yes, but the US is a religious extremist country.

--
Don't try to reply to my email addy:
I'm borrowing that of the latest
scammer/spammer


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HILTON HEAD Mike P. Travel - anything else not covered 0 January 24th, 2007 04:53 PM
Bangkok Hilton MrPirate28 Asia 4 July 28th, 2006 10:41 PM
LV Hilton - Len Marsha L Cruises 0 January 12th, 2006 06:34 PM
Hilton Millenium vs. Hilton Times Square Tom Miskiewicz USA & Canada 1 June 27th, 2004 07:08 PM
Huntington Hilton Retiredpilot2003 USA & Canada 0 October 15th, 2003 04:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.