If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal
"Tosser" wrote in message ...
"Tchiowa" wrote in message om... Ooops. That's more than a dozen. All too easy. Educate yourself. Discover the difference between assertion and proof. You educate yourself. The proof is in the observations that we can all see. Open your eyes. Funny how people demanded a list of countries where Capitalism works, then when challenged to produce the list where Socialism works they duck and run with little comments like you made above. Sounds like an admission of loss to me. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal
"DN" wrote in message ...
"Tchiowa" wrote in message om... SNIP Now let's make of list of countries that are converting to Capitalism and the people are seeing an enormous benefit (they are better off now than they were before): China, Indonesia, Thailand, Angola for starters. How about countries embracing Socialism and watching their economies get killed and people hurt? Like France? OK. Your turn. What Socialist countries have made their citizens lives better? Your list, please? John. Don't bother - he/she "Tchiowa", completely fails yet again, to understand the transitory nature of international economics and politics. God help us I say. I'm tempted to go on with this and quote Hoover pre 1929 but for now resist the temptation, for I am sure in the fullness of time it will need to be stated on this ng Translated to English you are saying that you really don't understand what Capitalism and Socialism mean and how they affect people's lives in the real world. Don't quote Hoover or anyone else from previous centuries. Look at people and the way they live *TODAY* to see the results of your misconceived economic system. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal
"Tchiowa" wrote in message om... Sounds like an admission of loss to me. Ah, perceptions .... |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal
"Tchiowa" wrote in message om... SNIP understand the transitory nature of international economics and politics. God help us I say. I'm tempted to go on with this and quote Hoover pre 1929 but for now resist the temptation, for I am sure in the fullness of time it will need to be stated on this ng Translated to English you are saying that you really don't understand what Capitalism and Socialism mean and how they affect people's lives in the real world. Don't quote Hoover or anyone else from previous centuries. Look at people and the way they live *TODAY* to see the results of your misconceived economic system. I'll quote who I damm well like, thank you. "Tchiowa", I don't think you are stupid, but I am beginning to wonder if your insouciance is a pose ? Or again, you have it all figured out and what is the use of fretting about the past and the future will look after itself ? St Mathew had something to say about this and it's worth a another look Ch6 V28 to 34 and is very comforting in the larger scheme of things and highly recommended. Comments like yours - they live *TODAY* to see the results of your misconceived economic system. - have, I am sad to say, echoes from the past ; somewhat recent (1987) and MANY times over previous Centuries. I hope for your sake you survive the next onslaught on the *system* better than millions before you. Quoting you again - Translated to English you are saying that you really don't understand what Capitalism and Socialism etc - Some truth in that. But who does, unless the whole history is evaluated and not just a tiny bit of it ?. This really is the last time "Tchiowa", that reply to you on this issue. DN |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal
"DN" wrote in message ...
"Tchiowa" wrote in message om... SNIP understand the transitory nature of international economics and politics. God help us I say. I'm tempted to go on with this and quote Hoover pre 1929 but for now resist the temptation, for I am sure in the fullness of time it will need to be stated on this ng Translated to English you are saying that you really don't understand what Capitalism and Socialism mean and how they affect people's lives in the real world. Don't quote Hoover or anyone else from previous centuries. Look at people and the way they live *TODAY* to see the results of your misconceived economic system. I'll quote who I damm well like, thank you. "Tchiowa", I don't think you are stupid, but I am beginning to wonder if your insouciance is a pose ? Or again, you have it all figured out and what is the use of fretting about the past and the future will look after itself ? St Mathew had something to say about this and it's worth a another look Ch6 V28 to 34 and is very comforting in the larger scheme of things and highly recommended. No, it's much more simple than that. Capitalism and Socialism have real life effects on real live people in the real world that we live in. Debating over who said what in which century is completely irrelevant to that reality. Quoting you again - Translated to English you are saying that you really don't understand what Capitalism and Socialism etc - Some truth in that. But who does, unless the whole history is evaluated and not just a tiny bit of it ?. ???? Who does? Everyone. At least everyone who wants to look at it. You don't need to know the history of a system in order to know how it works and how it affects people. Do you need to know the history of the automobile to decide whether a Ford or Toyota is best for your needs? Do you need to understand Bernoulli's Principle to know that flying is safe? Or which airline to choose? Your attempt at debating centuries old writings is nothing more than an attempt to divert attention away from the real world. I've been in Berkeley. Worked there for a while. Went to school there for a while. I know the game. This really is the last time "Tchiowa", that reply to you on this issue. Not surprising. In the meantime, try looking at what Socialism did to a billion Chinese and a quarter of a billion Russians and maybe you'll begin to understand. The maybe you can reply to yourself. |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal
Oh go and jump idiot
"Tchiowa" wrote in message om... "DN" wrote in message ... "Tchiowa" wrote in message om... SNIP understand the transitory nature of international economics and politics. God help us I say. I'm tempted to go on with this and quote Hoover pre 1929 but for now resist the temptation, for I am sure in the fullness of time it will need to be stated on this ng Translated to English you are saying that you really don't understand what Capitalism and Socialism mean and how they affect people's lives in the real world. Don't quote Hoover or anyone else from previous centuries. Look at people and the way they live *TODAY* to see the results of your misconceived economic system. I'll quote who I damm well like, thank you. "Tchiowa", I don't think you are stupid, but I am beginning to wonder if your insouciance is a pose ? Or again, you have it all figured out and what is the use of fretting about the past and the future will look after itself ? St Mathew had something to say about this and it's worth a another look Ch6 V28 to 34 and is very comforting in the larger scheme of things and highly recommended. No, it's much more simple than that. Capitalism and Socialism have real life effects on real live people in the real world that we live in. Debating over who said what in which century is completely irrelevant to that reality. Quoting you again - Translated to English you are saying that you really don't understand what Capitalism and Socialism etc - Some truth in that. But who does, unless the whole history is evaluated and not just a tiny bit of it ?. ???? Who does? Everyone. At least everyone who wants to look at it. You don't need to know the history of a system in order to know how it works and how it affects people. Do you need to know the history of the automobile to decide whether a Ford or Toyota is best for your needs? Do you need to understand Bernoulli's Principle to know that flying is safe? Or which airline to choose? Your attempt at debating centuries old writings is nothing more than an attempt to divert attention away from the real world. I've been in Berkeley. Worked there for a while. Went to school there for a while. I know the game. This really is the last time "Tchiowa", that reply to you on this issue. Not surprising. In the meantime, try looking at what Socialism did to a billion Chinese and a quarter of a billion Russians and maybe you'll begin to understand. The maybe you can reply to yourself. |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal
"Matt" wrote in message ...
Oh go and jump idiot Well, that response tells us a lot about the intelligence level of those supporting Socialism, doesn't it? 5555555555555 |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal
"Tchiowa" wrote in message om... SNIP Your attempt at debating centuries old writings is nothing more than an attempt to divert attention away from the real world. This really is the last time "Tchiowa", that reply to you on this issue. Not surprising. In the meantime, try looking at what Socialism did to a billion Chinese and a quarter of a billion Russians and maybe you'll begin to understand. The maybe you can reply to yourself. What am I to do with you "Tchiowa" ? The work of the Worlds Philosophers is a waste of time then, eh? We , ooops, you, can't benefit from their work is what you are really saying, although you may not be conscious of this. So, if it is convenient to quote the billions of Chinese and Russians who suffered, why is it not convenient to examine the untold billions who have died before them, world wide, and try and understand why? You see, all you are doing is cutting the cake of history, into thin slices, thence claim to understand the 'isms. ALL economic and political systems have made contributions to the billions of people you refer too. You see "Tchiowa", I attempted and failed, to draw you out from your glib political slogans and the "real world" you so fondly embrace, to a much larger canvas, which remains unfinished yet and which, if we are not careful, be finished with more blood on the canvas. I think about the future. I live in the present. I have a great deal of respect for what recorded history has taught us. I am pessimistic how world leaders handle the information gained from history and surprised how they largely go unchallenged. And that "Tchiowa" is a very dangerous state to live in, now or in the future.Count your self lucky having thus far, gone unscathed. DN |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal
And the way you have been carrying on tells everyone
to kill file you name or put up with the biggest load of dribble I have heard in quite a while and that really says it. Why dont you go to some more appropriate group if you want to carry on with that thread an dyou load of crap. Freda -- Please reply to the list as my email address is a fake "Tchiowa" wrote in message om... "Matt" wrote in message ... Oh go and jump idiot Well, that response tells us a lot about the intelligence level of those supporting Socialism, doesn't it? 5555555555555 |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:44:03 -0800, Tchiowa wrote:
Do you need to understand Bernoulli's Principle to know that flying is safe? Or which airline to choose? No, and anyway it's a gross oversimplification. But spelling his name right might help. :-) Not surprising. In the meantime, try looking at what Socialism did to a billion Chinese and a quarter of a billion Russians and maybe you'll begin to understand. The maybe you can reply to yourself. Actually, in both cases, one might build a case to the effect that it served them quite well. Particularly for China, the peasant leader Mao and his peasant rebellion (in the best Chinese tradition BTW) certainly helped rebuild a country that had been mired in a hopeless civil war, torn between small time warlords and their presonal interests. Make no mistake, without Mao, China would be much much worse today. Not htat this has much to do with socialism, except to the effect that they used the label. Russia is more controversial. Still, before 1917, Russia was a mediaval backwater. And the fall of the soviet regime was precipitated by the cold war and the incapacity of the relatively poor country that Russia was (and always had been) to compete on military spending. Futhermore, it's not that now that Russia is no longer socialist it is now significantly better. Most problems are structural and cultural. Largely orthogonal to the ideology of the day. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How US helped Iraq build deadly arsenal | devil | Asia | 0 | December 31st, 2003 10:22 PM |