If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
rick++ wrote: I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has propose a platform. You cant run on negation forever. Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at each others throats then. The conservatives promote government intervention in social issues, while libs abhor that. Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in social issues. -- "It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.", Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT), in uk.politics.misc, "rick++"
, wrote I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has propose a platform. You cant run on negation forever. Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at each others throats then. The conservatives promote government intervention in social issues, while libs abhor that. Libs promote government intervention in every aspect of life. FACE |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
In article ,
Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote: rick++ wrote: I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has propose a platform. You cant run on negation forever. Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at each others throats then. The conservatives promote government intervention in social issues, while libs abhor that. Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in social issues. Nah.... forcing an entire nation to buy HC insurance isn't a "social issue," nah, it's, er, for your own good. Wasting tax money on a tunnel in Florida for turtles isn't a "social issue," nah, it's er, for your own good... I mean, turtle road kill is just WRONG, man... Progressives NEVER meddle in "social issues." Just ask ACORN :-) -- "The Nizkor website (secretly financed by the ADL and other Jewish front organizations) is behind it." (David Irving, whining about Google's reminder of his disgrace.) The facts: http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/i/irvi...ent-00-00.html |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
Om Nitron wrote: Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On 04/07/2010 02:35 PM: rick++ wrote: Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at each others throats then. The conservatives promote government intervention in social issues, while libs abhor that. Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in social issues. Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin. Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are Libertarians. -- "It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.", Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:35:07 -0700, in uk.politics.misc, Om Nitron
, wrote FACE wrote, On 04/07/2010 02:58 PM: On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT), in uk.politics.misc, "rick++" , wrote I suspect this will changes if the party or a candidate actually has propose a platform. You cant run on negation forever. Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at each others throats then. The conservatives promote government intervention in social issues, while libs abhor that. Libs promote government intervention in every aspect of life. You're as much of an illiterate idiot as Bonde. The "libs" are the **LIBERTARIANS**, twit. Look you ****ing idiot, I am well aware of what a classic liberal is and what a modern liberal is and who holds the remnants of true liberalism today. I often make the distinction but maybe it has never reached whatever backwater you are in. Tough. Your attempt to set a silent followup newsgroup shows just what a ****ing coward you are, ****-for-brains. Check this out http://www.strangepolitics.com/image...ent/162342.JPG FACE |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)" Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to those who come after us. Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel .europe Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:04:45 +0000 Subject: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44% Om Nitron wrote: Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On 04/07/2010 02:35 PM: rick++ wrote: Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at each others throats then. The conservatives promote government intervention in social issues, while libs abhor that. Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in social issues. Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin. Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are Libertarians. I thought you loved abbreviations. You just got caught on one that was extremely clear when read in its context. I read it in context, and got it right away. However, since this abbreviation caught you, it should be a lesson: avoid abbreviations, spell it out. Donna Evleth -- "It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.", Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
Donna Evleth wrote: From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)" Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to those who come after us. Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel .europe Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:04:45 +0000 Subject: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44% Om Nitron wrote: Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On 04/07/2010 02:35 PM: rick++ wrote: Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at each others throats then. The conservatives promote government intervention in social issues, while libs abhor that. Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in social issues. Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin. Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are Libertarians. I thought you loved abbreviations. There is no abbreviation for "libertarian" that isn't overloaded with "liberal". Do you support overloaded abbreviations now? You just got caught on one that was extremely clear when read in its context. I read it in context, and got it right away. I didn't read the context because it's irrelevant. "Lib" is short for liberal or Liberal. However, since this abbreviation caught you, it should be a lesson: avoid abbreviations, spell it out. When overloaded abbreviations exist, the question should be will there be ambiguity. In the case of using the same short form for two political groups, yes. If the compiler could disambiguate, fine, but it can't. -- "It is illuminating for purposes of reflection, if not for argument, to note that one of the greatest 'fictions' of our federal system is that the Congress exercises only those powers delegated to it, while the remainder are reserved to the States or to the people. The manner in which this Court has construed the Commerce Clause amply illustrates the extent of this fiction.", Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264, 307 (1981) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
On Apr 5, 8:11*am, "Tis Odonovan, Himself" wrote:
Poll:TeaParty48% Obama 44% Monday, April 05, 2010 *http://preview.tinyurl.com/95f4zEvleths On major issues, 48% of voters say that the averageTeaPartymember is closer to their views than President Barack Obama. We will take our country back from this dangerous looser. Obama is a complete & utter disaster on every front, everything he touches turns to crap, the most pathetic congress and president ever imaginable in US history. He is a virtual enemy within, chairman Mao, Stalin or Chavez or Dr King could not of screwed up America's economy, policies or world standing any quicker than the phoney one and whoever is pulling his strings and fitted him w/ a teleprompter are hell bent on reducing America to just another socialist Afriacan nation, just another bankrupt welfare state |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
BrickboyTX wrote:
On Apr 5, 8:11 am, "Tis Odonovan, Himself" wrote: Poll:TeaParty48% Obama 44% Monday, April 05, 2010 http://preview.tinyurl.com/95f4zEvleths On major issues, 48% of voters say that the averageTeaPartymember is closer to their views than President Barack Obama. We will take our country back from this dangerous looser. Obama is a complete & utter disaster on every front, everything he touches turns to crap, the most pathetic congress and president ever imaginable in US history. He is a virtual enemy within, chairman Mao, Stalin or Chavez or Dr King could not of screwed up America's economy, policies or world standing any quicker than the phoney one and whoever is pulling his strings and fitted him w/ a teleprompter are hell bent on reducing America to just another socialist Afriacan nation, just another bankrupt welfare state Suggest you place your head in a large bucket of water. Leave it there for five or six minutes. You'll feel so much better afterwards. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44%
From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)" Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to those who come after us. Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel .europe Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:07:21 +0000 Subject: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44% Donna Evleth wrote: From: "Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously)" Organization: Our legacy is not the lives we lived but the lives we leave to those who come after us. Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty,uk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,rec.travel .europe Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:04:45 +0000 Subject: Poll: Tea Party 48% Obama 44% Om Nitron wrote: Bill Bonde {Colourless green ideas don't sleep furiously) wrote, On 04/07/2010 02:35 PM: rick++ wrote: Plus the libetarian and conservative wings of the party will be at each others throats then. The conservatives promote government intervention in social issues, while libs abhor that. Really? I thought that Liberals loved government intervention in social issues. Your illiteracy is continuing proof of your stupidity. The "libs" are the **LIBERTARIANS**, you brainless cretin. Commie Libs are Liberals, you nitwir. Libertarians are Libertarians. I thought you loved abbreviations. There is no abbreviation for "libertarian" that isn't overloaded with "liberal". Do you support overloaded abbreviations now? I don't support abbreviations at all as a general rule. You just got caught on one that was extremely clear when read in its context. I read it in context, and got it right away. I didn't read the context because it's irrelevant. "Lib" is short for liberal or Liberal. I will repeat, I will even shout: CONTEXT IS ALWAYS RELEVANT. In fact, it is the most relevant element of most paragraphs. The bottom line is that because you ignored context, you got caught. Donna Evleth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
44% “Strongly Disapprove” of Obama, 23% "Strongly Approve" ; only 43% somewhat approve of Obama at all. | PJ Odonovan | Europe | 0 | March 21st, 2010 10:02 AM |
Obama boozing? | PeeJayOdonovan[_2_] | Europe | 9 | March 5th, 2010 03:46 AM |
Obama for President | Amy | Travel Marketplace | 0 | December 13th, 2008 01:30 AM |
OT Obama | [email protected] | Cruises | 1 | September 30th, 2008 06:59 PM |
GGC2006: Labor Day Party, found a piper. (Guess this is a Ceilidh!) Party details. | piperut | Cruises | 60 | July 19th, 2005 06:53 AM |