If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
wrote: Go Fig schrieb: In article , Mika wrote: Go Fig wrote: In article , Mika wrote: Germany alone has given over 100 billion Eur to Israel since 1965. Oh please, that is the responsibility of the West German Government from the The Luxembourg Agreement... for reparations for trying to exterminate the Jews... it is NOT aid. Reparations? Yes, Reparations is exactly what they are and exactly what the West German Government agreed to pay in 1953... they were not voluntary after signing this agreement. What part of the word 'voluntary' do you refuse to understand, Figgy? Nothing voluntary about it, it was a condition, by the U.S., that got the treaty signed that gave W. Germany her sovereignty back... no payments, no sovereignty treaty. The money was OFFERED by the GER gummint. You are rapidly progressing from posting wing-nut propaganda to outright lies. It was a proposal by chancellor Adenauer in 1952. You are just WRONG!!!!! His response was from direct pressure from Zionist Jewish Agency which had a list of demands, which the U.S., Britain and France adopted as their own and told Adenauer this was the deal!! From Adenauer's own words: *** It was clear to me that, if the negotiations with the Jews failed, the negotiations at the London Debt Conference [which were going on at the same time] would also run aground, because Jewish banking circles would exert an influence upon the course of the London Debt Conference which should not be under-estimated. On the other hand it was self-evident that a failure of the London Debt Conference would bring about a failure of the negotiations with the Jews. If the German economy was to achieve a good credit standing and become strong again, the London Conference would have to be ended successfully. Only then would our economy develop in a way that would make the payments to Israel and the Jewish organizations possible. *** jay Mon May 30, 2005 His Israeli counterpart was Ben Gurion. Many in Israel were initially against accepting this offer, Begin being one of the more prominent ones. Ben Gurion won out, which was obviously a sound pragmatic decision. The initial offer was for 3.5 Bn DM, payable over 12 years. The payments are still continuing, topping 100 bn Eur by now. If that ain't voluntary, nothing is. And now Figgy, I'm must say that I'm really not interested in discussions with someone who engages in such a dishonest debating style as you anymore. Have a nice life, or, alternatively, accept my kind offer for a free ride on the scenic FO&D Railroad. Adios, pendejo. m |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
wrote: Class eh? Wanna see my Rotfront fist salute? Voelker hoert die Signale ... No pasaran! Nunca! Patria o muerte. Hey, this is fun. Figgy and Kulp will have simultaneous aneurisms. m the red Doubtful...you are strictly of the "Mickey Mouse" persuasion, not much more in fact than "bush league"... Post something a bit more substantial and mayhaps JBK and Jay will have a tussle with you...but I doubt it. They have bigger fish to fry...you are but a grunion making a mad moonlight dash to the shore. You could not even hold your own in a discussion about German reparations to Israel, that is hardly a "hot" topic these days...you obviously possess a hidebound and hopeless intellect. -- Best Greg |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Another out of context cite.
I'm not interested anymore. m |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
you obviously possess a
hidebound and hopeless intellect Joder, Gregorio. That from you, who is so obsessed with JF and Sjoerd and countless others. Since your definition of 'classy posts' obviously includes those made through weasely anonymous remailers, you may excuse me for not being terribly impressed. Tell me Greg, is Gregory Morrow your real name? Is it verifiable? Just asking. m |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know if you been posting here under another name or not, but
Jay has produced some quite impressive lies over the years. He actually isn't trolling, and has shown some serious signs of distress from time to time I've used several 'nicks' such as Mika or MDoelle, but have always used a 'real' email address in the 'reply to' in my usenet 'history. Not that I can prove that, but who can? michael, muc |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know if you been posting here under another name or not, but
Jay has produced some quite impressive lies over the years. He actually isn't trolling, and has shown some serious signs of distress from time to time I've used several 'nicks' such as Mika or MDoelle, but have always used a 'real' email address in the 'reply to' in my usenet 'history. Not that I can prove that, but who can? michael, muc |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
PS: I don't know if Figgy is citing some Neo-Nazi web site here, but he
probably is. Cause the London Debt Conference had **** all to do with the agreement to pay the initial 3.5 bn DM of restitution to Israel. The Den Haag agreement was mentioned in London, that much is true. But the claim that Israel somehow coerced the Germans "to pay up" is just so much Neo Nazi bull****. On the contrary, the Den Haag deal between Adenauer and Ben Gurion was quite unpopular in Israel. Don't believe it, look it up. Or just look at the wording that Figgy quoted: "Jewish banking circles". Adenauer did not talk like that. Or Ben Gurion would not have made the deal with him. Does Figgy know that Konrad spent time in camps? m |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
In article . com,
wrote: PS: I don't know if Figgy is citing some Neo-Nazi web site here, but he probably is. Cause the London Debt Conference had **** all to do with the agreement to pay the initial 3.5 bn DM of restitution to Israel. The Den Haag agreement was mentioned in London, that much is true. But the claim that Israel somehow coerced the Germans "to pay up" is just so much Neo Nazi bull****. On the contrary, the Den Haag deal between Adenauer and Ben Gurion was quite unpopular in Israel. Don't believe it, look it up. Or just look at the wording that Figgy quoted: "Jewish banking circles". Adenauer did not talk like that. Or Ben Gurion would not have made the deal with him. Does Figgy know that Konrad spent time in camps? m Pretty slick... no attributions, no quoted text... so your free to say what you want... now responding some 8 days later... a contemptible tactic that you deliberately employ. Israel did not put the pressure at the inception, it was worldwide jewish organizations as I SPECIFICALLY sited. Then the Allies made that principle their own and forced it upon Germany as a condition of W. Germany sovereignty.... not all payment went to Israel anyway. BTW: Adenauer words come from 1966... more than a decade after the treaty. Look it up! jay Mon Jun 06, 2005 |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Go Fig wrote: In article . com, wrote: PS: I don't know if Figgy is citing some Neo-Nazi web site here, but he probably is. Cause the London Debt Conference had **** all to do with the agreement to pay the initial 3.5 bn DM of restitution to Israel. The Den Haag agreement was mentioned in London, that much is true. But the claim that Israel somehow coerced the Germans "to pay up" is just so much Neo Nazi bull****. On the contrary, the Den Haag deal between Adenauer and Ben Gurion was quite unpopular in Israel. Don't believe it, look it up. Or just look at the wording that Figgy quoted: "Jewish banking circles". Adenauer did not talk like that. Or Ben Gurion would not have made the deal with him. Does Figgy know that Konrad spent time in camps? m Pretty slick... no attributions, no quoted text... so your free to say what you want... now responding some 8 days later... a contemptible tactic that you deliberately employ. Well Jay it appears we have pushed this "Mika" character here "over the edge" so to speak...lol -- Best Greg |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Gregorio,
I notice you've been playing nicey nicey for a while now. Keep it up. m |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does a no-fly list exist in Europe or flights to Europe?? | Earl Evleth | Europe | 1 | November 3rd, 2004 06:22 PM |
No-fly list' lacks rules, procedures | Earl | Europe | 3 | October 12th, 2004 04:04 AM |
"No Fly List" - is a net to supress voice??? | Kari Sinhalavan | Air travel | 96 | September 10th, 2004 03:44 AM |
Are You On Uncle Sam's No Fly List? | jake | Air travel | 52 | February 29th, 2004 04:01 PM |
Are You On Uncle Sam's No Fly List? | jake | USA & Canada | 52 | February 29th, 2004 04:01 PM |