If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Driving from SF to LA (PCH??)
"al" wrote in message
om... "qwerty" wrote in message om... "Carmen L. Abruzzi" wrote in message ... in article , al at wrote on 10/28/03 10:38 AM: 2- I am making the trip in December. What is the weather like? I hear the fog can be quite bad? Rain is more likely than fog. If it isn't raining it will likely be clear weather. If it is raining, the drive could be rather trecherous. Fog is a summer thing in this area. Also note that sections of this road wash out in the winter storms making it impassable, sometimes for months. How do I get details on this before heading out? I would assume if the roads are washed out it would be posted somewhere. you can get road status via telephone. see http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/roadinfo/ : "When traveling in California and the Reno, Lake Tahoe area, try our toll free voice activated 800 service, 1-800-427-ROAD (7623). This service is available free from any touch tone phone, cellular phone or pay phone. All other areas outside of California you can dial 916-445-7623 to reach the same service..." Also, at what level of rain should I consider another route? I hear the ride is difficult enough, so I would be under the impression that even a drizzle would cause quite a delay. Thanks again. I would drive this portion in rain only under these conditions: [1] the rain is light enough to have about a mile of visibility (to see the beauty). you can make this decision in monterey or salinas. [2] it is not the first rain of the season (otherwise the road is slippery). [3] I could drive early in the morning to avoid most of the traffic. remember, southbound is the more hazardous direction because you are on the cliff side of the road most of the way, and there are often no guardrails. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Driving from SF to LA (PCH??)
Thanks to everyone for the replies. Based on the responses I think it
may be wise to make a few changes. Any feedback would be appreciated. Rather than go from SF to Hearst (spending the night) and from Hearst to Santa Barbara the next day I am thinking of the following: Leave SF in the morning and do the 17 mile drive and then head to Big Sur and spend the night. From there head over to Hearst castle the next morning (as I will need a tour) and leave from there and head to Santa Barbara - which should get me there by the evening. All this on the PSH/Route 1. However, I am wondering if it best to stay at Big Sur or another area, or even near Hearst Castle and do the tour in the AM. Recommendations on any nice hotels at the area would be appreciated. "Carmen L. Abruzzi" wrote in message ... in article , al at wrote on 10/28/03 10:38 AM: I am planning on driving from SF to LA via the PCH or possibly the 101, with stops at Hearst castle and Santa Barbara. This is my first trip to California. I would also like to make a few additional stops along the way as needed. My questions are as follow, and I would appreciate any help anyone may be able to offer. 1- is it better to take the 101 or the PCH. Technically, the coast highway is not the PCH in this area, but lots of people call it that. Not locals, though. Be that as it may, Highway One is far more scenic than 101 between Monterey and San Luis Obispo. A lot slower too. I hear the 101 is faster but the PCH is more scenic. Is possible to take the PCH and then cut over to the 101? Well, yes and no. Cutting over to 101 after Hearst Castle won't save you any time, in fact it will probably take longer than continuing down the coast. The two highways meet up a short distance to the south at SLO, but this is after the most time cosuming and most scenic part of Hwy One. From there you can continue on the 101, but you won't save any time. 2- I am making the trip in December. What is the weather like? I hear the fog can be quite bad? Rain is more likely than fog. If it isn't raining it will likely be clear weather. If it is raining, the drive could be rather trecherous. Fog is a summer thing in this area. 3- I am planning on the ride on Dec 23. Will I hit any holiday traffic? 4- How long will it take to get to Hearst castle taking the PCH? Then from Hearst castle to Santa Barbara? Well, it depends on how long you stop and at how many places. Straight through, about 5 hours from SF to Hearst Castle. But you will want to allow several hours to stop and view the scenery along the way. It will get dark early at that time of year, so you would have to leave SF early to make it worthwhile to take the coast highway. From HC to Santa Barbara, another 3 hours. This part you can do more quickly, as it isn't quite as scenic. It will likely be dark by then anyway, if you make this trip in one day. You know that you can't just drive up to Hearst Castle? You have to take an organized tour, take a bus up from the highway to the Castle itself, and you may need advance reservations. 5- What other attractions are there to see along the way? All of Big Sur. See http://jrabold.net/bigsur/ and http://www.pelicannetwork.net/. I heard of the 17 mile drive but am not sure quite what it is? It's a toll road along the Monterey Peninsula. There is no reason to take it if you plan to drive down the coast on Hwy One. Stop at Point Lobos for an hour or so instead. Thanks in advance for you help. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Driving from SF to LA (PCH??)
I am planning on leaving SF on the 23rd and either: stopping in Big
Sur and spending the night and continue to Hearst castle the next day for a tour and on to Santa Barbara by the 24th. Or stoppping in Big Sur and stating near hearst for the evening and on to Santa Barbara the next day. You have planned this well (maybe unintentionally!) The heaviest traffic should be: LA - SB on the 24th. SB - LA on the 27th and 28th. I used to live in SB. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Driving from SF to LA (PCH??)
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Driving from SF to LA (PCH??)
I am a bit confused with the area that is considered Big Sur. Is it
form the Point Sur Lighthouse all the way down to Ragged Point? If so where is the best area? Also, from the list of hotel/motels/lodges does anyone have a recommendation? Thanks again. "Carmen L. Abruzzi" wrote in message ... On 10/29/03 7:30 AM, in article , "al" wrote: Thanks to everyone for the replies. Based on the responses I think it may be wise to make a few changes. Any feedback would be appreciated. Rather than go from SF to Hearst (spending the night) and from Hearst to Santa Barbara the next day I am thinking of the following: Leave SF in the morning and do the 17 mile drive and then head to Big Sur and spend the night. From there head over to Hearst castle the next morning (as I will need a tour) and leave from there and head to Santa Barbara - which should get me there by the evening. All this on the PSH/Route 1. However, I am wondering if it best to stay at Big Sur or another area, or even near Hearst Castle and do the tour in the AM. Recommendations on any nice hotels at the area would be appreciated. Staying overnight at Big Sur is probably the best idea, as this will give you more daylight to enjoy the Big Sur scenery. Provided you can get lodging, there isn't a lot of it in Big Sur. There are several motels/lodges in the town/village/hamlet of Big Sur itself, these are in the Big Sur River valley, so they do not overlook the ocean. South of there there's only a very few resorts, but these do have ocean views. Prices vary between about $80 to several hundred dollars per night. It will be the off season, but of course it will be the holidays, so you may need reservations. There's also plenty of camping, if you're willing to do that. Here's a site for lodging: http://www.bigsurcalifornia.org/lodging.html. Download the "El Sur Grande" pdf for more information, pics, and a good map showing the locations of the various lodging choices. Between Andrew Molera State Park and the Post Ranch Inn, you're in the river valley, otherwise you'll have ocean views, at least from the highway. After Ragged Point, you're back down within a few feet of sea level. There is lodging near Hearst Castle, but you'd have much more time in the most scenic part of the trip if you stayed in the Big Sur village area on your first night. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Driving from SF to LA (PCH??)
"al" wrote in message
om... I am a bit confused with the area that is considered Big Sur. Is it form the Point Sur Lighthouse all the way down to Ragged Point? If so where is the best area? Also, from the list of hotel/motels/lodges does anyone have a recommendation? Thanks again. yes, the term 'big sur' is used vaguely. generally speaking, the 'big sur coast' can be considered as the stretch from carmel highlands to just south of ragged point. 'big sur' proper is the valley of the big sur river. there is lodging at several places along the coast, and in big sur valley. at christmas time you will need reservations and you need to do it immediately, as all of these places fill during the holidays. I don't have a specific lodging recommendation for the big sur coast; my knowledge is of the san simeon / cambria area. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Driving from SF to LA (PCH??)
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Driving from SF to LA (PCH??)
On 10/28/03 5:27 PM, in article , "bbrr"
wrote: "Carmen L. Abruzzi" wrote in message ... in article , al at wrote on 10/28/03 10:38 AM: Well, yes and no. Cutting over to 101 after Hearst Castle won't save you any time, in fact it will probably take longer than continuing down the coast. The two highways meet up a short distance to the south at SLO, but this is after the most time cosuming and most scenic part of Hwy One. From there you can continue on the 101, but you won't save any time. actually, it is much faster to take 101 to hwy 46 at paso robles, then over the mountains to hwy 1, then back north to the hearst castle. I make this trip several times a year. Yes, that would be faster. But if you take 1, there's no way to save time by cutting over to 101 before San Luis Obispo. By the time you reach Big Sur, you're pretty committed to continuing south along the coast all the way to SLO. The only way to get over to 101 north of Hearst Castle is Nacimiento Road over the mountains, and that isn't going to save you time. In fact, you'd probably do better to double back from Big Sur to Monterey and pick up 101 around Salinas. Going from 1 to 46 to 101 south isn't going to be faster than just continuing on 1 to SLO. One and 101 share the same route between Santa Cruz and Monterey, then rejoin at SLO, but there isn't any good way to cut over from one to the other in between however, when I have the time, I prefer taking hwy 1 all the way. It is much more scenic. How long does it take by each route? 2- I am making the trip in December. What is the weather like? I hear the fog can be quite bad? Rain is more likely than fog. If it isn't raining it will likely be clear weather. If it is raining, the drive could be rather trecherous. Fog is a summer thing in this area. true, although california is not rainy compared to germany. unless it is an el nino year. 4- How long will it take to get to Hearst castle taking the PCH? Then from Hearst castle to Santa Barbara? Well, it depends on how long you stop and at how many places. Straight through, about 5 hours from SF to Hearst Castle. true, assuming no traffic problems between san francisco and morgan hill. otherwise, allow for more time. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Driving from SF to LA (PCH??)
"Carmen L. Abruzzi" wrote:
One and 101 share the same route between Santa Cruz and Monterey, then rejoin at SLO, but there isn't any good way to cut over from one to the other in between That is not the first grossly inaccurante, mis-informative, and just plain wrong statement that you have made in this thread, Carmen. I don't know whether you commit such outrages through carelessness or ignorance but, whichever, you're doing damage to our fellow travellers. If you can't get it right, don't! Because it's obvious that you don't know what you think you know, you should either check your absurd beliefs to see whether they're facts before posting them or let others accurately answer questions that you have repeatedly demonstrated that you cannot correctly. The fact is that California Highway 1 and US Highway 101 separate at Doyle Drive and Veterans Boulevard (i.e., between the MacArthur Tunnel and the Golden Gate Bridge Toll Plaza) and do not rejoin until San Luís Obispo, a separation greater than 230 miles. The Pacific Coast Highway is about 75 miles farther South, being farther than 300 miles from San Francisco. Highways California 1 and US 101 reseparate in Oxnard and would rejoin around Capistrano Beach were they not absorbed into InterState Highway 5 that takes them to San Ysidro. How long does it take by each route? See what I posted to this thread yesterday. __________________________________________________ ___________ A San Franciscan in 47.335 mile˛ San Francisco http://geocities.com/dancefest/ http://geocities.com/iconoc/ ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 IClast at SFbay Net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Autobahn reckless driver imprisoned | Thomas Peel | Europe | 172 | September 8th, 2005 09:03 AM |
Americans watching porn while driving! | J Kozlowski | Air travel | 44 | May 31st, 2004 06:40 PM |
Americans watching porn while driving! | Mrs. Pudenda Fallopini | Europe | 14 | April 13th, 2004 10:49 PM |
Driving in the former Yugoslavia | Sean Jordan | Europe | 13 | February 23rd, 2004 09:18 PM |
driving across the usa - the developments | rob tyler | USA & Canada | 60 | September 27th, 2003 05:46 PM |