If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:58:52 GMT, "Neil Gould"
wrote: Recently, NotPC posted: Snip Yeah, get rid of all the women and blacks. And take the stupid bigots with them at the same time. I did not say get rid of all the women and blacks. [...] The failure to see that the promotion of minorities and women into some key safety positions within the FAA was a mistake. Perhaps you can explain the difference between these remarks, and how they are not bigotted? He has no interest in that. He is just trying to use what he calls political correctness to cover his bigotry. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:20:26 GMT, Marty Shapiro
wrote: "Morgans" wrote in : "Allen" wrote AVIATION FUEL General Aviation Fuel Aviation gasoline: $0.193/gallon Tax Jet fuel: $0.218/gallon Commercial Fuel Tax $0.043/gallon Wow! I didn't know that the airlines paid almost no tax on fuel. Do the corporate jets get the same tax break, or do they pay the higher rate of .s28 per gallon? From your post, I take that they do not. How about the new light jet businesses that do the taxi type charters? The airlines really have balls complaining about others not paying their fair share, when they pay squat on fuel, and little on per seat taxes. Typical of their powerful lobby. It still ****es me off, though. Only the airlines pay no tax for fuel. All part 91 GA operations, which includes corporate jets pay. I just looked up what airlines pay, and this is what it says: Do U.S. airlines also pay fuel taxes? At the federal level, airlines pay 4.4 cents for every gallon consumed on a domestic flight. Of that amount, 4.3 cents goes to the Airport and Airway Trust Fund while 0.1 cents supports the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fund. In addition, in most states airlines pay a flat rate per gallon or an ad valorem sales tax on the purchase of fuel. In California, for example, airlines pay a fuel tax in excess of 8.0 percent of the price of jet fuel. So if the price of jet fuel purchased in California were to double, our tax would double as well, generating substantial revenue for the state's treasury. Based on this, I don't know where the poster got the other taxes from if he is applying them to airlines. We all know where the 4.4 cents per gallon goes. In a trust fund that the government routinely robs to use for everything except what it was passed for. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
John Kulp wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:08:38 -0400, "Morgans" wrote: "Allen" wrote AVIATION FUEL General Aviation Fuel Aviation gasoline: $0.193/gallon Tax Jet fuel: $0.218/gallon Commercial Fuel Tax $0.043/gallon Wow! I didn't know that the airlines paid almost no tax on fuel. Do the corporate jets get the same tax break, or do they pay the higher rate of .s28 per gallon? From your post, I take that they do not. How about the new light jet businesses that do the taxi type charters? The airlines really have balls complaining about others not paying their fair share, when they pay squat on fuel, and little on per seat taxes. Typical of their powerful lobby. It still ****es me off, though. -- Jet fuel is basically kerosene, which is used for multiple purposes. You don't tax industries for fuel per se, but all users of the product. I don't think kerosene has every been taxed much, unlike gas. Everyone pays whatever the tax is on this. Do you not even read what you respond to? The post from Allen above shows you that the Jet Fuel Tax for GA is $0.218/gal. The same fuel used by Airlines is $0.043/gal. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
John Kulp wrote:
Perhaps. It's been a loooong time since I was piloting aircraft. But then, what are the fees being talked about for exactly? Why, exactly, are the majors talking about their customers paying almost all the freight then? They are paying for the services they are using. Most of the infrastructure is there because of the airlines and their passengers. All those little airplanes and even the CEO jets that are flying around can and do function quite well without much less. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:22:06 -0400, NotPC
wrote: Neil Gould wrote: Recently, NotPC posted: Snip Yeah, get rid of all the women and blacks. And take the stupid bigots with them at the same time. I did not say get rid of all the women and blacks. [...] The failure to see that the promotion of minorities and women into some key safety positions within the FAA was a mistake. Perhaps you can explain the difference between these remarks, and how they are not bigotted? Neil If you identify or expose a minority in a safety job who is unqualified does that automatically make you a bigot? Which you haven't done. And, yes, the way you expressed all this obviously makes you a bigot. Are we so blinded by political correctness that we can't say "Hey, that Black Female is unqualified"? Is that now taboo? Yeah. Saying that some person, whether black, a woman, etc. would not be. If you had any proof for it. Blacks and Women who are unqualified or incompetent love to scream bigot or racism at the first hint of job action against them. It's their first line of defense or "Shield" That's because idiots like you give them all the ammunition they need to do so. Goes right over your head huh? Is that not wrong? No. because you gave them all the ammunition they need to do so. Would you sit in the left seat and keep your mouth shut if the Black Female captain ****ed up or demonstrated poor piloting skills? No, but not because the are black or female. Any proof for this stupid assertion btw? Got any specific cases for us? I can show you plenty of cases of drunk pilots (see NW). Don't know whether they were white, black, male, female or whatever. And don't care. That is scary. Political Correctness reminds me so much of Communism. Shut up and accept it. Or maybe a better word is modern day tyranny. Your mentality is what's scary. A good description is some obviously bigoted idiot that is trying to disguise his bigotry with a bunch of complete crap like this. And is too dumb to ever realize it presumably. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:47:54 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: Jet fuel is basically kerosene, which is used for multiple purposes. You don't tax industries for fuel per se, but all users of the product. I don't think kerosene has every been taxed much, unlike gas. Everyone pays whatever the tax is on this. Do you not even read what you respond to? The post from Allen above shows you that the Jet Fuel Tax for GA is $0.218/gal. The same fuel used by Airlines is $0.043/gal. Yeah. That's why I said they pay whatever the tax is. I didn't realize from his desciption that only the $0.43 tax was the only tax airlines paid, though (it is actually $0.44). Who pays the second tax? I thought that was airlines as well, but apparently not. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:50:43 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: John Kulp wrote: Perhaps. It's been a loooong time since I was piloting aircraft. But then, what are the fees being talked about for exactly? Why, exactly, are the majors talking about their customers paying almost all the freight then? They are paying for the services they are using. Most of the infrastructure is there because of the airlines and their passengers. All those little airplanes and even the CEO jets that are flying around can and do function quite well without much less. Well, the issue as I understand it is user fees, not fuel tax. The argument is that GA doesn't pay these and all the airline passengers do. Is that not the case? |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
John Kulp wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:20:26 GMT, Marty Shapiro wrote: "Morgans" wrote in : "Allen" wrote AVIATION FUEL General Aviation Fuel Aviation gasoline: $0.193/gallon Tax Jet fuel: $0.218/gallon Commercial Fuel Tax $0.043/gallon Wow! I didn't know that the airlines paid almost no tax on fuel. Do the corporate jets get the same tax break, or do they pay the higher rate of .s28 per gallon? From your post, I take that they do not. How about the new light jet businesses that do the taxi type charters? The airlines really have balls complaining about others not paying their fair share, when they pay squat on fuel, and little on per seat taxes. Typical of their powerful lobby. It still ****es me off, though. Only the airlines pay no tax for fuel. All part 91 GA operations, which includes corporate jets pay. I just looked up what airlines pay, and this is what it says: Do U.S. airlines also pay fuel taxes? At the federal level, airlines pay 4.4 cents for every gallon consumed on a domestic flight. Of that amount, 4.3 cents goes to the Airport and Airway Trust Fund while 0.1 cents supports the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fund. In addition, in most states airlines pay a flat rate per gallon or an ad valorem sales tax on the purchase of fuel. In California, for example, airlines pay a fuel tax in excess of 8.0 percent of the price of jet fuel. So if the price of jet fuel purchased in California were to double, our tax would double as well, generating substantial revenue for the state's treasury. Based on this, I don't know where the poster got the other taxes from if he is applying them to airlines. We all know where the 4.4 cents per gallon goes. In a trust fund that the government routinely robs to use for everything except what it was passed for. OK and GA pays 19.3 cents for avgas and 21.8 cents for jet fuel. Everybody pays the .1 cent for the LUSTF. Just to be clear 4.4 21.9 |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
John Kulp wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:50:43 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: John Kulp wrote: Perhaps. It's been a loooong time since I was piloting aircraft. But then, what are the fees being talked about for exactly? Why, exactly, are the majors talking about their customers paying almost all the freight then? They are paying for the services they are using. Most of the infrastructure is there because of the airlines and their passengers. All those little airplanes and even the CEO jets that are flying around can and do function quite well without much less. Well, the issue as I understand it is user fees, not fuel tax. The argument is that GA doesn't pay these and all the airline passengers do. Is that not the case? The airlines pay a lesser fuel tax and per segment tax. GA doesn't pay a per segment tax but this is made up for with a higher per gal fuel tax. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:22:02 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: OK and GA pays 19.3 cents for avgas and 21.8 cents for jet fuel. Everybody pays the .1 cent for the LUSTF. Just to be clear 4.4 21.9 So, then, the airlines do not pay the 21.8 cent tax? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any problems with Travel Guard since they were bought by AIG? | Jeff Gersten | Cruises | 14 | November 26th, 2006 02:07 AM |
Florence Travel Article | [email protected] | Europe | 0 | September 16th, 2006 01:10 PM |
Australia Travel Article | [email protected] | Australia & New Zealand | 10 | September 15th, 2006 08:36 AM |
christmas air travel problems | Bill Hilton | USA & Canada | 2 | December 30th, 2004 10:31 AM |
old record and travel to USA - Anyone had problems? | bwfan | USA & Canada | 4 | January 2nd, 2004 09:48 PM |