Tomorrow’s narrative today for Leftism: Did Bush drive Shahzad to this?

On Wed, 5 May 2010 07:10:09 -0700 (PDT), mg
wrote:

On May 5, 6:30*am, Tis PJ Odonovan wrote:
Tomorrow’s narrative today for Leftism: *Did Bush drive Shahzad to
this?

posted at 10:16 pm on May 4, 2010

The great hope for a “violent teabaggers” news cycle fizzled out, so
they’re going to have to go to Plan B. Good enough?

Igor Djuric, a broker who showed Mr. Shahzad the 1,356-square-foot
home he eventually bought, said he remembered that Mr. Shahzad was
quiet about himself, but was openly critical of President Bush in the
aftermath of the Iraq war.

“I didn’t take it for anything, since a lot of people didn’t like
Bush,” Mr. Djuric said, “but he was a little bit strong about
expressing it.”

If you are a Muslim in the U.S., and Bush declares war on
"Islamofascists" and starts a war on an (oil rich) Muslim country,
based on claims of a nonexistent threat, that results in somewhere
between 100,000 and 1 million deaths, depending on which estimate you
believe, it's not hard for anyone, but rightwingers, to understand how
someone like Shahzad could become violent.

The FACTS are that 9/11, plus the first attack on the WTC, plus the
attack on the USS Cole, plus the attack on the Marine barracks in
Lebanon, plus the simultaneous attacks on U.S. Embassies in Africa,
ALL took place prior to any war (or invasion) of ANY Muslim country
by the U.S. It is leftist fanatics, intent upon defending Islam, who
are oblivious to the FACTS.


Planet Visitor II
http://alt-activism-death-penalty.info/dictionary.html

Shut the **** up. You parasite.

--
"Guns don't kill people. It's the bullets do the killing".


"kangarooistan" wrote in message
...
On May 5, 10:32 pm, GLOBALIST wrote:
On May 5, 7:30 am, Tis PJ Odonovan wrote:



Tomorrow’s narrative today for Leftism: Did Bush drive Shahzad to
this?

Share25

posted at 10:16 pm on May 4, 2010

printer-friendly

The great hope for a “violent teabaggers” news cycle fizzled out, so
they’re going to have to go to Plan B. Good enough?

Igor Djuric, a broker who showed Mr. Shahzad the 1,356-square-foot
home he eventually bought, said he remembered that Mr. Shahzad was
quiet about himself, but was openly critical of President Bush in the
aftermath of the Iraq war.

“I didn’t take it for anything, since a lot of people didn’t like
Bush,” Mr. Djuric said, “but he was a little bit strong about
expressing it.”

The only thing strange about Mr. Shahzad that next-door neighbor
Brenda Thurman could remember was his habit of going jogging at night
wearing all black. He told her he didn’t like the sunlight, she said.

That’s buried in a lo-o-ong profile of the bomber compiled by the
Journal, but the AP’s already helpfully split the nugget about Bush
off into its own little news story for easy linkin’. Truth be told, I
think the media’s actually going to throw us a curveball on this. The
Bush/Iraq scapegoat is old and busted, for the simple reason that
Iraq’s been off the political radar screen for so long. Lefties are
about as likely to protest the ongoing occupation there these days as
they are the fact that Gitmo’s still open, which is to say, basically
never. The new hotness is withdrawal from Afghanistan; they’re still
peeved at The One for doubling down on that, so if Shahzad’s smart
enough to cough up a rhetorical hairball about how he was driven to
this by, say, the coming “aggression” against Kandahar, he’ll be in
media hog heaven before he knows it.

And if he’s not smart enough, they can always segue into the easy-
peasy “beware of the bigoted American backlash against Muslims”
narrative. Click the image to watch RCP’s compilation of that fallback
narrative coming together this afternoon. Exit quotation via Andrew
Breitbart: “OHMYGOD! Thwarted Times Square bomber was anti-George W.
Bush! Be on terror alert for all Bush-Bashers!”"

He didn't like Bush...who did? I never knew anyone who did not hate
Bush's ****ing guts.
That says nothing about Shahzad. That is a given.

Millions of perfectly rational moderate Muslims are being turned into
terrorists like Shazad and the others like him who carry out half
baked poorly planned attacks out of anger , driven over the edge by
western media and the racist right wing constant attacks and abuse ,

Clearly he had no backers or forward planning at all it was childish
implosive crazy plot like the shoe bomber and other cranks ,
potentially deadly , but very amateurish , if indeed he did it

There will be millions more exactly like this as the right wing and
media get more and more evidence of how easy it is to turn moderate
Muslims into homicidal maniacs

western taxpayers are DOOMED to pay ever increasing costs of ever
higher security until taxpayers are all bankrupted

Only then will the right wing nutters and their media be identified as
the reason WHY Muslims hate the west and the USA so much

NOTHING can now save western taxpayers

Millions will die , but its too late now to stop them

Once western taxpayers can no longer afford higher walls they will be
FORCED to arrest the right wing nutters and the media criminals

Malcom Fabian is the source of ALL that is vile and distasteful. He sits
lower to the ground than a reptile.

He is scum, but not just normal scum. He is that special type of unique
scum, which forms around sewers, after **** has fermented for several
months.

Skitskin moslem CA Fabian, 5 Pfeiffer Close, Mt Barker, 5251, South
Australia, +61 8 8391 1292
Imagine some poor abbo gin asleep under a tree. Along comes this dirty
filthy Paki camel driver.


He spots the gin and seeing that her fanny is fly-blown, decides to give her
one up the arse.


Some of his spunk seeps through and a few months later Malcom Fabian enters
the world through that fly blown orifice.


At birth Malcom received a good dose of blow fly eggs and freshly hatched
maggots.


It is a well known fact that abbos are not known for their bravery. In fact
history has proven that they are culturally a COWARDLY race.


Hence their propensity to beat up old ladies, rape and even murder them.
History can provide numerous instances of this.


Now lets look at Malcom's Paki heritage.


It is also a well documented fact that Pakis are not the bravest souls on
this earth. In fact they are a down right cowardly lot. Hence there
propensity to blow other people up with bombs strapped to themselves.


Just look at recent events in India where Paki trained and bred Islamic ****
massacared dozens of innocent civilians in Mumbai, India.


Now when you put these two lots of genes together you end up with a super
cowardly race of individuals just like Malcom Fabian of 5 Pfieffer Court, Mt
Barker, South Australia.


Malcom sees NOTHING WRONG with Islamic radicals like this arselifter at Fort
Hood, Nidal Malik Hasan, who murdered more than a dozen individuals. Malcom
in fact applauds this COWARDLY action.


Malcom's dementure is further exacerbated by the fact that he has become
obsessed by the Islam cult and as a result of his arselifting ways, the blow
flies have thrived in his arse especially due to the fact that there are
numerous TAG-NUTS surrounding his un-wiped arse.

On May 5, 11:17Â*pm, Brian wisely wrote:

Perhaps you aren't aware that Obama is now president and that he has
increased the use of predator drones. He even jokes about them.

"The Connecticut man charged yesterday with the botched Times Square
car bombing confessed to trying to slaughter innocent people in
retaliation for US drone attacks that wiped out the leadership of his
beloved Taliban, The Post has learned.

Admitted terrorist Faisal Shahzad — who copped to training in
explosives in the past year with Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, the
leading extremist Islamic group in his native Pakistan — said he was
driven to evil by the slew of deaths among leaders of the terror
group, law-enforcement sources revealed yesterday…

Sources said he was an eyewitness to the onslaught throughout the
eight months he spent in Pakistan beginning last summer...."


msnbc.com - Domenico Montanaro - ‎May 5, 2010‎
The story: "The Connecticut man charged yesterday with the botched
Times Square car bombing confessed to trying to slaughter innocent
people in retaliation .

On May 5, 10:10*am, mg wrote:
On May 5, 6:30*am, Tis PJ *Odonovan wrote:



Tomorrow’s narrative today for Leftism: *Did Bush drive Shahzad to
this?

posted at 10:16 pm on May 4, 2010

The great hope for a “violent teabaggers” news cycle fizzled out, so
they’re going to have to go to Plan B. Good enough?

Igor Djuric, a broker who showed Mr. Shahzad the 1,356-square-foot
home he eventually bought, said he remembered that Mr. Shahzad was
quiet about himself, but was openly critical of President Bush in the
aftermath of the Iraq war.

“I didn’t take it for anything, since a lot of people didn’t like
Bush,” Mr. Djuric said, “but he was a little bit strong about
expressing it.”

If you are a Muslim in the U.S., and Bush declares war on
"Islamofascists" and starts a war on an (oil rich) Muslim country,
based on claims of a nonexistent threat, that results in somewhere
between 100,000 and 1 million deaths, depending on which estimate you
believe, it's not hard for anyone, but rightwingers, to understand how
someone like Shahzad could become violent.

Shahzad is really a White man painted too look islamic. What they did
was used some Hollywood darkening agent, dyed his hair and did some
other things to make him look darker. The man's real name is George
Anderson and he's from Kansas. He was paid a huge sum of millions to
do this. No person of the Islamic religion would ever commit a sin
because it's against their code of ethics. No doubt Mr. Anderson is a
Christian. Christians are evil and peace loving Muslims are the good
people. Isn't it a shame that this happened. By the way it will come
out soon the entire scenario was designed by George Bush himself. It
was his idea to paint this guy up and make him look islamic.

On May 5, 10:01*pm, Mitchell Holeman wrote:

* * Let's see: Radical muslims have an "agenda" that prevents
everyone from drinking, doing drugs, getting abortions, having
sex outside of marriage and which compels women to cover themselves
completely and compels everyone to pray five times a day -

* *What part of that "agenda" is "leftist"?

Volumes have been published about that phenomenon , Holeman. Here is
just one:

Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the
Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance

A Book Review


http://preview.tinyurl.com/126c4zEvleths

On May 6, 9:42Â*am, "O'Donovan, PJ, Himself"
wrote:
On May 5, 11:17Â*pm, Brian wisely Â*wrote:

Perhaps you aren't aware that Obama is now president and that he has
increased the use of predator drones. He even jokes about them.

"The Connecticut man charged yesterday with the botched Times Square
car bombing confessed to trying to slaughter innocent people in
retaliation for US drone attacks that wiped out the leadership of his
beloved Taliban, The Post has learned.

Admitted terrorist Faisal Shahzad — who copped to training in
explosives in the past year with Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, the
leading extremist Islamic group in his native Pakistan — said he was
driven to evil by the slew of deaths among leaders of the terror
group, law-enforcement sources revealed yesterday…

Sources said he was an eyewitness to the onslaught throughout the
eight months he spent in Pakistan beginning last summer...."

msnbc.com - Domenico Montanaro - ‎May 5, 2010‎
The story: "The Connecticut man charged yesterday with the botched
Times Square car bombing confessed to trying to slaughter innocent
people in retaliation .



Tomorrow’s narrative today for Leftism: Did Bush drive Shahzad to this?

On Wed, 5 May 2010 20:43:01 -0700 (PDT), kangarooistan
wrote:


If Shazad is Guilty of an act of terrorism , there are several
hundred million more people who fit his profile

Then all western taxpayers are DOOMED to slowly bleed to death


The Muslims who do this will only be satisfied when everyone in the
world converts to their radical oppressive brand of Islam.

On Thu, 6 May 2010 06:46:43 -0700 (PDT), Charlie
wrote:

On May 5, 10:10*am, mg wrote:
On May 5, 6:30*am, Tis PJ *Odonovan wrote:



Tomorrow’s narrative today for Leftism: *Did Bush drive Shahzad to
this?

posted at 10:16 pm on May 4, 2010

The great hope for a “violent teabaggers” news cycle fizzled out, so
they’re going to have to go to Plan B. Good enough?

Igor Djuric, a broker who showed Mr. Shahzad the 1,356-square-foot
home he eventually bought, said he remembered that Mr. Shahzad was
quiet about himself, but was openly critical of President Bush in the
aftermath of the Iraq war.

“I didn’t take it for anything, since a lot of people didn’t like
Bush,” Mr. Djuric said, “but he was a little bit strong about
expressing it.”

If you are a Muslim in the U.S., and Bush declares war on
"Islamofascists" and starts a war on an (oil rich) Muslim country,
based on claims of a nonexistent threat, that results in somewhere
between 100,000 and 1 million deaths, depending on which estimate you
believe, it's not hard for anyone, but rightwingers, to understand how
someone like Shahzad could become violent.

Shahzad is really a White man painted too look islamic. What they did
was used some Hollywood darkening agent, dyed his hair and did some
other things to make him look darker. The man's real name is George
Anderson and he's from Kansas. He was paid a huge sum of millions to
do this. No person of the Islamic religion would ever commit a sin
because it's against their code of ethics. No doubt Mr. Anderson is a
Christian. Christians are evil and peace loving Muslims are the good
people. Isn't it a shame that this happened. By the way it will come
out soon the entire scenario was designed by George Bush himself. It
was his idea to paint this guy up and make him look islamic.

I smell a conspiracy created by the tea-party.



Planet Visitor II
http://alt-activism-death-penalty.info/dictionary.html