If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!"
....so was the light bulb at first. I read the test results were
encouraging. Didn't they pick out six of ten test faces entering the baseball world series nearly two years ago... I'd assume they got even better since... Tim K "Miguel Cruz" wrote in message ... Tim Kroesen wrote: You're going to have a camera soon at the entrance to every major public portal with very advanced facial recognition s/w behind it. It is in use already. And so far the technology is a resounding failure. miguel -- Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors!!!"
Stephen Harding wrote:
Well the US and Europe are going their separate ways. I'm hoping the divorce is a rapid one personally, and certainly better for both I've come to believe. There is an old saying that people who fail to learn from history are destined to repeat it. In the case of isolationism, the US has tried that numerous times before, and has thoroughly regretted it each time. You had better rethink you position. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors!!!"
George Z. Bush wrote:
"Stephen Harding" wrote in message ... George Z. Bush wrote: You might be right if the world was driven only by political idealogies. Unfortunately, we live in a global economy, like it or not, and it'll be a very cold day in hell when US corporations divorce themselves from their international trading partners. Don't hold your breath waiting for it to happen, 'cause it's not going to happen any time soon. Absolutely true. I was speaking only in a political alliance sense. The business world is global and there's no getting around it, nor should we want to. I'm all for businesses fighting it out around the world, but no American blood or treasure to keep some government in power or feeling secure; that means S. Korea, Taiwan, Japan or even UK if it came to such a thing. It means no NATO, WTF, IMF, World Bank or whatever. UN is OK for debating practice. Back to good old George Washington's admonition, "no entangling foreign alliances". That'd be peachy keen in his day, when it took a couple of months to cross the Atlantic, but now it's only a couple of hours via SST. The world has changed, and no one has yet discovered how to make the clock run backwards in order for us to not have to make adjustments. George Z. Not quite that bad. Now that they've junked the SSTs it's a safer place. Still hours but a reasonable number of them. FFM |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!"
....all fingerprints monitor is what you do also... BTW; you do NOT own
left behind fingerprints. Only those engaged in illegal activity have any fears. Fingerprints are much more reliable ID than multiple witnesses seeing your face. Proven in courtrooms all the time, fingerprints are second only to DNA as reliable proof of identity. Retinal patterns are said to be even more reliable than fingerprints as ID but no sizable dbase exists at present to make it useful. Tim K "mtravelkay" wrote in message . com... Eryk wrote: mtravelkay I see.. you can't visit the US because you believe that taking fingerprints and photos is treating you like a criminal, but you have no complaints about living in a country with street cameras??? Of course not. Cameras monitor what you 'do', they do not intrusively probe into who you are. So, how is this less obtrusive than a still photo at Immigration? I 'own' my identity and I resent people trespassing into it ...I do not 'own' my publicably observable actions in the same sense since I choose to project those actions into the public domain when I do whatever it is the cameras record me doing. It is the difference between someone taking a photo of your house from the street without specific consent (acceptable) and someone walking into your bedroom and photographing you in bed without specific consent (unacceptable). One is invasive, the other is merely observation. How do you compare taking a photo at Immigration with intruding into your bedroom? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors!!!"
In article , nobody
wrote: It gives the illusion of enhancing security. Secondly, and more importantly GET OVER IT. 9-11 was many years ago. Two and a half is not "many." Unless you're Lenny from "Of Mice and Men," of course. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!"
How can we appease the libertines then who reject fingerprints as
intrusive??? Better profiling...g Tim K "Frank F. Matthews" wrote in message ... Since the current advanced facial recognition software will result in innumerable false positives using that trash could easily shut down the airline industry. FFM Tim Kroesen wrote: You're going to have a camera soon at the entrance to every major public portal with very advanced facial recognition s/w behind it. It is in use already. So much for your fingerprints... Tim K "mtravelkay" wrote in message . com... Gary L. Dare wrote: Actually, screening has turned up 200 people on various offences. Did the photo or the fingerprints accomplish this??? I suspect it wasn't the photo. So, are you suggesting that it would be ok for cops to stop people at will on the the street and scan their fingerprints? After all, if you can 200 at the airports, imagine how many you can catch if you fingerprint everyone at Major League Baseball games. How many of those 200 offenses had ANYTHING to do with terrorism? I would bet none of them. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!"
Chad Irby wrote:
But in modern practical political terms, "liberal" has been co-opted by the left as "their" term. In the US, when someone is referred to as "liberal," it means they support policies on the left side of the spectrum, and often the *far* left side. No. It's simpler than that. A "Liberal" is simply a label for someone who disagrees with you. It has supplanted the appellation "communist" or "Pinko" as a popular insult. Kind of like when people were called "gay" or "sluts" as the ultimate insult in high school, whether it was true or not. Modern leftists are certainly *not* classical liberals, and often support the most extreme examples of fascism (the liberals of the 1930s would throw a fit if they saw some of the folks modern self-described "liberals" are supporting). True liberals would be in Iraq, working to help get rid of the last of Saddam's crew, instead of trying to tell us that we should leave them in place. The interesting thing about this current debate is that the conservatives, who traditionally were vociferous supporters of individual rights, minimalist government, and freedom, are the ones who are pushing for individual identity cards, government databases of personal information, and further government intrusion into daily life in the name of security. The so-called Liberals, who traditionally supported things like firearm registration, legislation on what people can and cannot do, and bigger government, are the ones who are fighting the expanded powers of the government. It's almost a role reversal. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!"
Tracking people ***doing*** what ??? The real point is being evaded...
Who cares if a policeman observes you cross the street if you're not jaywalking??? Tim K "James Robinson" wrote in message ... Chad Irby wrote: James Robinson wrote: "Big Brother" is not restricted to totalitarian regimes. Again, being a democracy, does it make it better that they take photos and fingerprints from everybody? But I don't see you complaining about the *real* Big Brother problem of all of the security cameras in England... I don't consider that a particular problem, since they aren't automatically tracking my whereabouts. It is no worse than the systems already in place in the US. Have you looked at the ceiling in your local Walmart to see how many cameras they have? The problem I have with taking fingerprints is that they are specifically using them to track people, and marry up to central databases of info on what I read in libraries, who I send Emails to, and what I purchase with my credit card. That is a much more insidious agenda than simply replacing the beat policeman's eyes with a camera. Good idea. Let's all pass out assault weapons so the terrorists can get hold of them more easily. And don't register them, so you can't find them. Another fool who thinks that outlawing and/or registering firearms will keep criminals and terrorists from getting them... My intent was to expose the inconsistency in your argument. You have no problem with the government tracking peoples movements and maintaining a database on your activities, but complain about the simple registration of firearms, when you acknowledge that is a waste of time. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors!!!"
Stephen Harding wrote:
There are many policy differences between the US and Europe. When you become an American citizen you can indeed ask that question, and use your freedoms to promote your ideas of what government should do. Until then, its an internal matter for the US to decide. Tough luck for you. Kind of like how the US left countries like Cuba, Iran, Honduras, Chile, Argentina, Grenada, Egypt, and many others, to chart their own course when they were democracies? Then why do other countries not need finger prints? Perhaps because they aren't targets of terror the way the US is? Every whacko prefers to go after number one, and that would be the US. The policies of the Bush government have only increased that likelihood, by acting unilaterally, and in continuing the biased treatment of Arab countries in the region. At one time the US had a moral standing in the world that was envied. It was the belief that diplomacy was the most important approach to a problem, and violence was only the last resort, when all other peaceful avenues had been exhausted. The attack on Iraq has eliminated that unique position, and lowered the US to the ranks of other bullies around the world. It was so unnecessary, and it will take many years to regain the confidence of the rest of the world. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors!!!"
Stephen Harding wrote:
Marie Lewis wrote: "Stephen Harding" wrote in message I realize 3000 people, largely Americans, killed in a terror incident probably doesn't effect you too much, but we consider it a rather traumatic event here. Far more have been killed in Europe and over a longer period. Somehow, we seem to be able n ot to get our knickers in such a twist as you, who thought you were invulnerable. I am sorry for those who lost loved ones: but I fear the over reaction is both intrusive and useless in catching terrorists. Crapola! No one had experienced a 9/11 scale event! The Spanish were quite rightly traumatized by the 3/11 experience that killed "only" 200, and they have had quite a bit of terrorist experience over the past 30 years. Let's see. When you consider the 3/11 deaths as a proportion of the Spanish population, you come pretty close to the ratio of 9/11 to the US population. It might not be at the same total, but would have a similar effect on the views of the population. 3/11 becomes their day of infamy. Beyond that, how do you think the Iraqis feel about the multiple attacks on their country by the US leaving thousands dead and raining missiles around their homes? That would be pretty traumatic, wouldn't it? There's nothing like a battle on home soil. Your "long suffering Europe/what's the big deal USA" line doesn't carry much weight with me. Your insensitivity to the effects of two world wars on the European landscape is pretty obvious. The US has led a charmed existence for the last hundred years, with no major wars fought on its home soil. It's no reason to denigrate the people who have survived such things. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!" | Quantum Foam Guy | Air travel | 411 | April 13th, 2004 03:59 PM |
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!" | Shawn Hearn | Air travel | 2 | April 5th, 2004 08:39 AM |
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!" | Ken Pisichko | Air travel | 8 | April 5th, 2004 08:09 AM |
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!" | tadaa | Air travel | 0 | April 3rd, 2004 11:51 PM |
Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!" | nobody | Air travel | 0 | April 3rd, 2004 07:19 AM |