If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
MSC Opera - recent Panama Canal 10 day cruise - brief review
Ok. I'll hit the major points. My background is about 25 cruises on
the standard mid-level lines, Holland-America, Royal Caribbean, Carnival, Celebrity, and several British lines. Did a recent 10 day Opera cruise - Dec 19th - 28th - South from Ft. Lauderdale to Jamaica, Cartagena, up to the Panama Canal, Costa Rica, Mexico, etc. Check in was quick, quick, quick. Disembarkation was the same, with no hassles with immigration coming aboard and everyone doing the 6:30 or 7:30 line up to see an immigration officer for 10 seconds. Haven't done a cruise since last Spring, so maybe it's this way for evey line now, but it was efficient and wonderful. You go thru' immigraton very quickly AFTER you disembark, not early in the morning on the ship. And breakfast was served till at least 9:30 or 10:00 on disembarkation morning. Very civilized. Rooms were smaller than average apparently, but you couldn't tell it in the room as they were wider than average (though shorter), and felt much bigger (with the exception of the smallest shower in cruising captivity!) The ship decor was elegant, beiges and blues, but undistinguishable from any other new ship (it was completed in March 2004, or so). Very elegant, generally very very clean. Staff were very friendly and tried hard - all spoke English - or a close approximation. So did all the passengers, and I estimate about 20 per cent were from Europe. So it was annoying that most announcements were in about 5 languages. It gets very annoying after a while to hear an introduction that goes on for 10 minutes. I expect they'll shift to English only fairly shortly - for their North American product anyhow. Food was very good to excellent for the dinner restaurant seatings. It was basically good continental food with choices largely like the other lines, very well prepared - exactly to your request. In addition to the main choices, you could always order steak, chicken or fish if you didn't like the offerings. There was usally a regional Italian specialty dish offered, and highlighted as such, and they were GOOD. The menu offered about 7 courses - appetizer, salad, soup, pasta or risotto (all very varied), main course choices, desert, and cheese or fruit plate. Coffee was not good - weak and bland. The breakfast and lunch buffets were good, but repetitive - with a few changes daily. The formal restaurant lunches and breakfasts served a limited menu, with less choice (and nothing really different) than the buffet lunches and breakfasts, so really not much point to them aside from being served. For completeness, there were outside grills for hotdogs, hamburgers, etc, and often a seving station for a pasta of the day, salads, etc, at lunch near the pool. Evening shows nightly were overall easily the best and most varied of any cruise line we've used. The talent was amazing, and the innovation and energy outstanding. They put together spectaculars for Xmas, which aside from being great theater, were remarkable in that those shows would not then be used afterward as part of their regular rotation. Impressive. Most nights had great costumed dance acts and production numbers - it was not the 2 production shows of a normal one week cruise. They were all great. Annoyances? Yup, they were there - but very, very minor, and I think it'll change over the next months. I mentioned the language issue; it was definitly non-essential overkill. Folks have already mentioned that the only drinks freely available during the day were coffee and tea. You could get juice at breakfast, and iced tea in the formal restaurants at night, but not at any other time - other than thru' room service. Needs to change. And they were slow to clean tables during any of the meals. Staff seemed to stand around talking to each other, but were not quick to clean off dirty tables - very different from my experiences with the other lines. I'm sure this will all change. Smoking wasn't the issue I thought it might be. Staff do not quickly enforce the ban on smoking in non-smoking areas, and sometimes break it themselves. Still, it wasn't really a general problem, and I think that with some feedback, MSC will deal with the issue over here. And, just for something a little different, this was the first ship I've been on, that didn't have a urinal aboard! It's Ok, we didn't have to hold till we disemabarked . . . toilets were abundant. All in all it was an extremely pleasant experience and a really great cruise in a beautiful ship, with superb entertainment, excellent food and staff that (generally) are trying hard. Overall, it was a far better cruise than the average that are provided by any of the lines I mentioned at the top of this review - and we look forward to trying them again. Stan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"M. Souris" wrote in message ... All in all it was an extremely pleasant experience and a really great cruise in a beautiful ship, with superb entertainment, excellent food and staff that (generally) are trying hard. Overall, it was a far better cruise than the average that are provided by any of the lines I mentioned at the top of this review - and we look forward to trying them again. Stan Nice review Stan. I'm sailing on MSC OPERA in January and can't wait. Ernie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 19:27:55 -0500, M. Souris wrote:
Overall, it was a far better cruise than the average that are provided by any of the lines I mentioned at the top of this review - and we look forward to trying them again. Stan Looks like MSC is going to be a keeper. Nice review, Stan. What cabin did you have and, optionally, what did you pay pp? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 19:27:55 -0500, M. Souris wrote:
Overall, it was a far better cruise than the average that are provided by any of the lines I mentioned at the top of this review - and we look forward to trying them again. Stan Looks like MSC is going to be a keeper. Nice review, Stan. What cabin did you have and, optionally, what did you pay pp? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:59:32 -0500, E.k.R. wrote:
Nice review Stan. I'm sailing on MSC OPERA in January and can't wait. Ernie I got a good feeling about this cruise, Ernie. Ship size, touch of European style, but they had better be True Premium as they say at balcony rates near $250 plus pp/day. I told them it was all up to Roller, they will live or die in the US market based on what your review claims. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:59:32 -0500, E.k.R. wrote:
Nice review Stan. I'm sailing on MSC OPERA in January and can't wait. Ernie I got a good feeling about this cruise, Ernie. Ship size, touch of European style, but they had better be True Premium as they say at balcony rates near $250 plus pp/day. I told them it was all up to Roller, they will live or die in the US market based on what your review claims. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Chrissy Cruiser wrote in
: On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:59:32 -0500, E.k.R. wrote: Nice review Stan. I'm sailing on MSC OPERA in January and can't wait. Ernie I got a good feeling about this cruise, Ernie. Ship size, touch of European style, but they had better be True Premium as they say at balcony rates near $250 plus pp/day. I told them it was all up to Roller, they will live or die in the US market based on what your review claims. The biggest problem with the balaconies is that though they call them suites, they are no larger than Celebrity standard balconies |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Chrissy Cruiser" wrote in message ... I got a good feeling about this cruise, Ernie. Ship size, touch of European style, but they had better be True Premium as they say at balcony rates near $250 plus pp/day. I told them it was all up to Roller, they will live or die in the US market based on what your review claims. You are too funny! I agree the balcony rates are not quite the bargain that the insides and outsides are. I'll be sailing in a standard outside cabin. For my sailing, standard balconies (Cat 10) ran $1045 per person ... or $149 pp/day. Not too bad. Jump up to the larger Cat 11 which they call a suite (and it's not), and the rate jumps to $1795 or $256 pp/day as you mentioned. Inside cabins started at $495 or $71pp/day which is a true bargain. I think the biggest downfall for MSC in the US is the smaller cabins and limited balconies. The new ships MSC are constructing (MSC MUSICA and sister) will address this problem. They are being built in France off the same hull-platform as CORAL PRINCESS and well be loaded with standard balconies. I have a feeling MSC MUSICA might find it's way to N. America year round. I just hope with the larger ship and quest to attract N.American passengers MSC doesn't become just like the rest of the pack. I can certainly live with a smaller (but well designed) cabin with no balcony to experience something a little different. One thing everyone has been raving about is the entertainment and "Animation Team". Funny enough, I was prepared for the entertainment to be low budget at best. I didn't think it would be a stand-out MSC feature, but over and over again I hear it's the best people have ever enjoyed on a cruise ship. It seems to be the one point people are unanimously happy about. I'm anxious to see it myself. If anything ... you can count on me to be truthful about the MSC product. I know it won't be perfect and I'll be watching for the "potential factor". Ernie ps - I understand CEO Rick Sasso has been meeting the ship at every turnaround in Ft. Lauderdale. Things are being enhanced and tweaked with every cruise. This is a very good sign. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I got a good feeling about this cruise, Ernie. Ship size, touch of European style, but they had better be True Premium as they say at balcony rates near $250 plus pp/day. I told them it was all up to Roller, they will live or die in the US market based on what your review claims. On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 08:26:08 -0600, jcoulter wrote: The biggest problem with the balaconies is that though they call them suites, they are no larger than Celebrity standard balconies I understand that the terminology is confusing but square footages don't lie (unless they put the balcony into inside of aside from the sq ft statement). If you look at some of the MSC photos Ernie posted, these cabins look humongous. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I got a good feeling about this cruise, Ernie. Ship size, touch of European style, but they had better be True Premium as they say at balcony rates near $250 plus pp/day. I told them it was all up to Roller, they will live or die in the US market based on what your review claims. On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 08:26:08 -0600, jcoulter wrote: The biggest problem with the balaconies is that though they call them suites, they are no larger than Celebrity standard balconies I understand that the terminology is confusing but square footages don't lie (unless they put the balcony into inside of aside from the sq ft statement). If you look at some of the MSC photos Ernie posted, these cabins look humongous. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carnival Quarter & Full Year Earnings! | Ray Goldenberg | Cruises | 0 | December 16th, 2004 02:29 PM |
RCI Radiance 10/16-10/24 Review (Atlantis Cruise) LONG | YourName | Cruises | 23 | November 28th, 2004 03:32 AM |
holland america cruise holland america cruise line alaska cruise holland america holland america cruise ship | Islam Promote Peace | Cruises | 3 | July 31st, 2004 10:31 PM |
Delayed cruise review - Carnival Triumph (VERY LONG) | Thomas Smith | Cruises | 11 | December 31st, 2003 06:23 AM |