If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Co-pilot error caused AA 587 crash
Sylvia Else wrote in
u: Rich Ahrens wrote: AbsolutelyCertain wrote: "Sylvia Else" wrote in message u... Those who sit at the pointy end of the aircraft may like to ponder where their self interest lies before indulging themselves in this respect. Oh my. Pretty entertaining, isn't she? I try to be of service. obviously. Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sylvia Else wrote in
u: Rich Ahrens wrote: AbsolutelyCertain wrote: "Sylvia Else" wrote in message u... Those who sit at the pointy end of the aircraft may like to ponder where their self interest lies before indulging themselves in this respect. Oh my. Pretty entertaining, isn't she? I try to be of service. obviously. Bertie |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sylvia Else wrote in
u: I wrote: It's probably not just a problem in aviation. There are things that seem so blindingly obvious to engineers that it's difficult for them to conceive the notion that a non-engineer might not recognise the truth. Alaska Airlines Flight 261 might be an example. You have a flight control system element that's jammed for no apparent reason. Therefore you have no idea what it might do if you mess with it, so if you can land with it in its current state, then leave the damned thing alone, and land. What a fjukwit Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sylvia Else wrote in
u: AbsolutelyCertain wrote: "Sylvia Else" wrote in message u... I wrote: It's probably not just a problem in aviation. There are things that seem so blindingly obvious to engineers that it's difficult for them to conceive the notion that a non-engineer might not recognise the truth. Alaska Airlines Flight 261 might be an example. You have a flight control system element that's jammed for no apparent reason. Therefore you have no idea what it might do if you mess with it, so if you can land with it in its current state, then leave the damned thing alone, and land. Sheesh! Do tell us more. You appear to be breaking new ground in aeronautical science here ........... Well, breaking wind, anyway. It seems to have been obvious the NTSB too. Just not to the crew. Lots of things are obvious to pilots. Like wannabe ****s who are needy enough to try and get any attention they can, good , bad or indifferent by amking compleat asses of themselves on usent. Bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sylvia Else wrote in
u: AbsolutelyCertain wrote: "Sylvia Else" wrote in message u... I wrote: It's probably not just a problem in aviation. There are things that seem so blindingly obvious to engineers that it's difficult for them to conceive the notion that a non-engineer might not recognise the truth. Alaska Airlines Flight 261 might be an example. You have a flight control system element that's jammed for no apparent reason. Therefore you have no idea what it might do if you mess with it, so if you can land with it in its current state, then leave the damned thing alone, and land. Sheesh! Do tell us more. You appear to be breaking new ground in aeronautical science here ........... Well, breaking wind, anyway. It seems to have been obvious the NTSB too. Just not to the crew. Lots of things are obvious to pilots. Like wannabe ****s who are needy enough to try and get any attention they can, good , bad or indifferent by amking compleat asses of themselves on usent. Bertie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Sylvia Else wrote in u: I wrote: It's probably not just a problem in aviation. There are things that seem so blindingly obvious to engineers that it's difficult for them to conceive the notion that a non-engineer might not recognise the truth. Alaska Airlines Flight 261 might be an example. You have a flight control system element that's jammed for no apparent reason. Therefore you have no idea what it might do if you mess with it, so if you can land with it in its current state, then leave the damned thing alone, and land. What a fjukwit Please note that Berties disagrees here. He wants the right to meddle. Perhaps he wants to join those ace Alaska Airlines pilots, wherever they are now. Sylvia. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Sylvia Else wrote in
u: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Sylvia Else wrote in u: I wrote: It's probably not just a problem in aviation. There are things that seem so blindingly obvious to engineers that it's difficult for them to conceive the notion that a non-engineer might not recognise the truth. Alaska Airlines Flight 261 might be an example. You have a flight control system element that's jammed for no apparent reason. Therefore you have no idea what it might do if you mess with it, so if you can land with it in its current state, then leave the damned thing alone, and land. What a fjukwit Please note that Berties disagrees here. He wants the right to meddle. Perhaps he wants to join those ace Alaska Airlines pilots, wherever they are now. Serious fjukwit. I'm blessed. or even better than even I thought. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sun Times Mag: Death row | Sufaud | Europe | 0 | September 26th, 2004 11:53 AM |
American Airlines' Preaching Pilot | rom | Air travel | 418 | February 24th, 2004 03:59 PM |
Religious nut pilot speaks! | Rick | Air travel | 80 | February 21st, 2004 02:57 AM |
American Airlines Pilot Plugs Christianity | jake | Air travel | 25 | February 17th, 2004 06:16 PM |
Xtian Pilot - It just keeps getting better! | None | Air travel | 3 | February 10th, 2004 02:32 PM |