A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travelling Style » Air travel
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Boeing 787



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 31st, 2005, 07:39 PM
Charles Newman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 787


According to one Flight Simulator site, the Boeing
7E7 is now officially the 787. They are currently
changing all references to downloads of the plane
from 7E7 to 787. According to the site's press
release, Boeing has officially renamed the 7E7
to 787, according to flightsim.com



  #2  
Old January 31st, 2005, 10:00 PM
Blake S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Charles Newman" . on.sight
wrote in message ...

According to one Flight Simulator site, the Boeing
7E7 is now officially the 787. They are currently
changing all references to downloads of the plane
from 7E7 to 787. According to the site's press
release, Boeing has officially renamed the 7E7
to 787, according to flightsim.com




Hmm, wonder if the Flight Simulator site would tell me the price of hot dogs
at O'Hare?


  #3  
Old February 1st, 2005, 06:32 PM
Peter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . net, Blake
S says...
Hmm, wonder if the Flight Simulator site would tell me the price of hot dogs
at O'Hare?


It's under the options menu. Check foodstuffs and specify mustard or
mayo to get the appropriate stain on your boarding pass.

Pete, making it up as he goes along
  #4  
Old February 1st, 2005, 06:34 PM
Peter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Charles Newman says...

According to one Flight Simulator site, the Boeing
7E7 is now officially the 787. They are currently
changing all references to downloads of the plane
from 7E7 to 787. According to the site's press
release, Boeing has officially renamed the 7E7
to 787, according to flightsim.com


Apparently this is to make it more attractive to Asian carriers where 8
is a lucky number. Weird.

Pete, thinking that the A380 has got a leg up in that market
  #5  
Old February 2nd, 2005, 05:18 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well... The Chinese word for the number "8" sounded like the Chinese
word for "happy". It's not weird at all, it's like calling an
aircraft's engine with the acronym of "Super Advance Flight Engine"
(S.A.F.E.).

On the other hand, the Chinese word for the number "4" sounded like the
Chinese word for "death", and it's considered to be an unlucky number.

That's why China Southern ordered 5 A380 instead of 4 A380. The Airbus
340 and the Boeing 747 also might be a difficult sell toward the
Chinese market, though the Chinese might have soften a little to the
747, if they consider the number 7 to be also lucky.

It's kinda like calling a home with the acronym of "Computerized
Reliable Advance Super Home" (C.R.A.S.H.).



As for Asian carriers liking the number "8".

Only the Chinese ones and the Japanese ones. The rest of Asia don't
care much about the number "8" unless they deal with the Chinese and
the Japanese.



As for the A380.

Well... The "8" in "A380" is definetly used to attract the Chinese
market.

The argument of the "8" was used because of the shape of the fuselage
was never really a convincing one, and that argument probably is use to
convince those who are against numberology to accept the A380.

However, despite the clever numbering and the high capacity of the
Airbus A380, it doesn't necessary would be a big hit in the Chinese
domestic market.

You see, the Chinese domestic air travel while is quite high in the
amount passengers traveling, it's quite fragmented and irratic.

So it's not like a large amount of people travelling into certain
cities at certain times, it's more a small to medium amount of people
travelling into a LOT of cities at a diverse times.

However, there's a high peak season here and there (like the upcoming
Chinese New Year), so the Airbus A380 probably would be a good thing,
provided that the airports are capable of loading and unloading the
passengers effieciently (there are reasons on why the early concepts of
the Boeing 747 becoming a full double decker airline were rejected).

It should be noted that due the fragmented and irratic nature of the
Chinese domestic air travel, the Chinese operated a LOT of the
McDonnell-Douglas MD-80 family (notice the "8" trend again), I once
ride a China Southern MD-90.

And I think that there are a lot of companies in China that produce
parts for the MD-80 family.

And guess who own McDonnell-Douglas now?

China Southern seems to operate a lot of Boeing 737 too.



As for Boeing 787.

It's not really that suprising that the 7E7 will become the 787.

The E in the 7E7 is bound to be a number anyway, the 787 is the next
number inline after the 777, and of course, there's the Chinese factor
of the 787.

If things go for the 787 family like it did for the MD-80 family and
the 737 family, the 787 family probably would be a hit in the Chinese
market.


With the number 787 filled, that would mean that final number of the
7X7 family is the 797. If the Sonic Cruiser did become a production
model, the 797 probably would have been taken by the Sonic Cruiser.

Or maybe Boeing now would jump to the 8X8 family now, aftering the
Chinese markets?

  #6  
Old February 2nd, 2005, 06:38 AM
Dave Fossett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:

As for Asian carriers liking the number "8".

Only the Chinese ones and the Japanese ones. The rest of Asia don't
care much about the number "8" unless they deal with the Chinese and
the Japanese.


The number "8" has no significance to the Japanese, either. "4" is
traditionally avoided where possible, because it sounds the same as the word
for death, but that obviously never frightened away Japanese carriers from
buying Boeing 747-400s.


--
Dave Fossett
Saitama, Japan

  #7  
Old February 5th, 2005, 04:00 AM
JMS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote in message
Well... The Chinese word for the number "8" sounded like the Chinese
word for "happy". It's not weird at all, it's like calling an
aircraft's engine with the acronym of "Super Advance Flight Engine"
(S.A.F.E.).

On the other hand, the Chinese word for the number "4" sounded like the
Chinese word for "death", and it's considered to be an unlucky number.

That's why China Southern ordered 5 A380 instead of 4 A380. The Airbus
340 and the Boeing 747 also might be a difficult sell toward the
Chinese market, though the Chinese might have soften a little to the
747, if they consider the number 7 to be also lucky.

It's kinda like calling a home with the acronym of "Computerized
Reliable Advance Super Home" (C.R.A.S.H.).

Even today on many aircraft they don't have a row 13 and in some airports
they don't have a gate 13.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vietnam Airlines Plans To Order 4 Boeing 7E7s Clark W. Griswold, Jr. Air travel 0 December 31st, 2004 10:24 PM
Boeing to build 777 freighter nobody Air travel 37 November 19th, 2004 07:31 PM
Primaris Air orders 20 Boeing 7E7 nobody Air travel 44 November 1st, 2004 01:09 PM
Boeing Launches 7E7 nobody Air travel 15 April 30th, 2004 12:27 AM
All Nippon to Order Boeing 50 7E7 Planes Worth $6 Bln taqai Air travel 0 April 26th, 2004 09:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.