39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.

In article ,
says...

"Jason McNorton" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
Hertz Dount wrote:

"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount"
said:


"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount"
said:

I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a
vacilator like Billary gaining office.

Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly
be
worse
than the last few Republicans.


Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the
country
over to terrorists and illegal aliens.

I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your
paranoia.


I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them
are
prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in!

Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit,
and
Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what
it
takes to stand up to the job.

So which of the Reps is any better?

Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems
to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them are
better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us in
2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world in
2008 too.


You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans.

Back at you, but replace 'Republicans' with 'any democrat'.

In article , gmgraves2
@comcast.net says...
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:02:34 -0700, John wrote
(in article ) :


"Jason McNorton" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
Hertz Dount wrote:

"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount"
said:


"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount"
said:

I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a
vacilator like Billary gaining office.

Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly
be
worse
than the last few Republicans.


Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the
country
over to terrorists and illegal aliens.

I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your
paranoia.


I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them
are
prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in!

Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit,
and
Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what
it
takes to stand up to the job.

So which of the Reps is any better?

Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems
to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them are
better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us in
2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world in
2008 too.


You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans.


He may not be deluded to support the Republicans, but he is certainly deluded
to project that they could win a Presidential election as hated as Bush & Co.
is at this point in time.

Thankfully there's no election today.. IE, endless things can and will
happen between now and the next election. And if hillary or obama is
the best they can offer, I'm pretty ok with that.

In article ,
Hatunen wrote:

Also, the ONLY punishment a guilty vote by the Senate is removal
from office. For a crime necessitating a judgement such as
imprisonment, the person would have to be brought before a
regular court for a regular trial. The regular trial is NOT
redundant.

But a President could pardon himself.

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:43:58 -1000, "Hertz Dount"
wrote:


"Hatunen" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:58:32 -1000, "Hertz Dount"
wrote:


"Hatunen" wrote in message
...

I expect there has been similarly broad lying by presdent in the
past, but probably on different subjects.



I know of no president, other than Clinton, who deliberately and
repeatedly
lied to the citizens of this county.

I know of no president, that when caught with DNA evidence linking him to
a
crime tried to change the meaning of a word in the English language

I know of no ther president, save for perhaps Richard Nixon, who displayed
such a lack of integrity as did Clinton.

You are aware, aren't you, that Clinton hasn't been president for
some six-plus years now? Isn't it about time you changed dead
horses?


Why? You flog them when it suits your needs. Clinton will always be
a man withour morals, no matter how long it has been since his term of
office.

Who gives a ****? Besides you, I mean.


--
************* DAVE HATUNEN ) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:46:14 -1000, "Hertz Dount"
wrote:


"Walt Tucker" wrote in message
...

"Hertz Dount" wrote in message
news:2qqdnc4U_9Z0IgbbnZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d@hawaiiantel. net...

I know of no ther president, save for perhaps Richard Nixon, who
displayed such a lack of integrity as did Clinton.

The U-2 spy plane incident during the Eisenhower administration comes to
mind.

http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/dl/...documents.html

Let's see....one is for National Security and the other is to lie about
being an adulterer and a sodomizer.

Pathetic that you cannto see the difference. One was to protect the
interest of the nation, and the other was to cover up a blowjob.

So, then, you admit lying can be OK?

What interest of the nation was being protected? The Russians
knew they had shot down the U-2, but the world was told
otherwise. Even Eisenhower realized he had to come clean about
it.

--
************* DAVE HATUNEN ) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:34:05 +0200, (Lars
Träger) wrote:

Yellowbeard wrote:

In previous replies I read where someone was upset about the recent
pardon in Washington.
I will wait to see who else and how many more get pardonded. Like in
Jan 2001--- see link
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pardonchartlst.htm
Clinton claimed executive privilege for a subpoena of records back
then too.

Which one on the list even worked for the Clinton administration?

And why couldn't Shrubya wait till Jan 2009? Who is he going to pardon
then? Chuck Manson?

He can't pardon Manson.

--
************* DAVE HATUNEN ) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

"John" wrote in message
...

"Jason McNorton" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
Hertz Dount wrote:

"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount"
said:


"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount"

said:

I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a
vacilator like Billary gaining office.

Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly
be
worse
than the last few Republicans.


Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn
the
country
over to terrorists and illegal aliens.

I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your
paranoia.


I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them
are
prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in!

Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit,
and
Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what
it
takes to stand up to the job.

So which of the Reps is any better?

Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems
to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them are
better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us in
2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world in
2008 too.


You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans.

No, it would be insane to support the "cut and run" democrats, who would be
weak and cowardly in the face of terrorism.

Honu

"George Graves" wrote in message
. net...
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:02:34 -0700, John wrote
(in article ) :


"Jason McNorton" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
Hertz Dount wrote:

"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount"
said:


"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount"
said:

I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a
vacilator like Billary gaining office.

Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly
be
worse
than the last few Republicans.


Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the
country
over to terrorists and illegal aliens.

I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your
paranoia.


I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them
are
prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in!

Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit,
and
Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what
it
takes to stand up to the job.

So which of the Reps is any better?

Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems
to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them are
better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us in
2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world in
2008 too.


You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans.


He may not be deluded to support the Republicans, but he is certainly
deluded
to project that they could win a Presidential election as hated as Bush &
Co.
is at this point in time.


There are still people who can see that the democrats have no candidate of
any rela value to offer. Many don't wish to give in to the terrorists the
way the dems and libs do.
Many still love this country enough to not to want to sell it out.

And there are folks smart enough so see that the Billary-bot is nothing buch
a chimera to put her husband back in power.

Honu

"Jason McNorton" wrote in message
. ..
In article , gmgraves2
@comcast.net says...
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:02:34 -0700, John wrote
(in article ) :


"Jason McNorton" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
Hertz Dount wrote:

"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount"
said:


"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount"

said:

I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a
vacilator like Billary gaining office.

Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly
be
worse
than the last few Republicans.


Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn
the
country
over to terrorists and illegal aliens.

I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your
paranoia.


I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of
them
are
prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in!

Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit,
and
Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have
what
it
takes to stand up to the job.

So which of the Reps is any better?

Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems
to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them
are
better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us
in
2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world
in
2008 too.


You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans.


He may not be deluded to support the Republicans, but he is certainly
deluded
to project that they could win a Presidential election as hated as Bush &
Co.
is at this point in time.

Thankfully there's no election today.. IE, endless things can and will
happen between now and the next election. And if hillary or obama is
the best they can offer, I'm pretty ok with that.

After they sell out the country, will you still be "okay with that"?

Honu

"Jason McNorton" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

"Jason McNorton" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
Hertz Dount wrote:

"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount"

said:


"sechumlib" wrote in message
...
On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount"

said:

I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a
vacilator like Billary gaining office.

Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could
possibly
be
worse
than the last few Republicans.


Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn
the
country
over to terrorists and illegal aliens.

I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your
paranoia.


I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of
them
are
prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in!

Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit,
and
Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have
what
it
takes to stand up to the job.

So which of the Reps is any better?

Thankfully for the wellbeing of the entire world, so far (and it seems
to be in this presidential election in 2008) that almost all of them
are
better than any of the top 5 democrat runners. That's what helped us
in
2004, and at this rate will save the nation and the perhaps the world
in
2008 too.


You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans.

Back at you, but replace 'Republicans' with 'any democrat'.

Those that support the democrats are not delusional. Those that support the
democrats are brain-dead.

Honu