A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travel Regions » USA & Canada
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #381  
Old July 18th, 2007, 12:46 AM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.true-crime,alt.tv.tech.hdtv,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Matthew L. Martin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default 39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.

George Graves wrote:


That alone should be worrisome. There are a lot of people in this country who
think that Bill Clinton is some kind of Apollo-like god, and will vote for
The Clinton Bitch just to get Billy-boy back. Never mind that the likelihood
is very strong that Billy WON'T play "First Lady" to The Bitch's Presidency.
I mean its not like they live together as husband and wife NOW. I've heard
that The Clinton Bitch is a canoe bailer. I don't care,personally (actually,
it fits her, somehow) but, if that's true and she gets formally "outed", that
COULD be enough to save the country from her evil talons.


And people wonder why neo-cons are falling like flies. The general
population seems to be fed up with political dialog like that above. How
about discussing issues instead of your fantasies about candidates'
sexual preference.

You do know what an issue is, don't you?

Matthew

--
I'm a consultant. If you want an opinion I'll sell you one.
Which one do you want?
  #382  
Old July 18th, 2007, 01:40 AM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.true-crime,alt.tv.tech.hdtv,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
sechumlib
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 987
Default 39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.

On 2007-07-17 19:46:17 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin" said:

George Graves wrote:


That alone should be worrisome. There are a lot of people in this
country who think that Bill Clinton is some kind of Apollo-like god,
and will vote for The Clinton Bitch just to get Billy-boy back. Never
mind that the likelihood is very strong that Billy WON'T play "First
Lady" to The Bitch's Presidency. I mean its not like they live together
as husband and wife NOW. I've heard that The Clinton Bitch is a canoe
bailer. I don't care,personally (actually, it fits her, somehow) but,
if that's true and she gets formally "outed", that COULD be enough to
save the country from her evil talons.


And people wonder why neo-cons are falling like flies. The general
population seems to be fed up with political dialog like that above.
How about discussing issues instead of your fantasies about candidates'
sexual preference.

You do know what an issue is, don't you?


No, they don't. Clinton-hating trumps all, no matter which Clinton is involved.

And don't get the idea this is limited to neo-cons. Clinton-hating is a
favorite sport among the near- to far-right wing.

The latest, in the above message, is close to a libel. I make the
assumption that "canoe bailer" is another name for a lesbian, though I
don't really know. But the unresisted impulse is to put every possible
stigma on a Clinton, whether he/she deserves it or not. She's probably
considered a "bitch" because she has the chutzpah to run for president,
which no arch-submissive woman of the right kind should do. Assert
yourself, and you're a bitch.

There is a pretty good chance, at this point, that Hillary will be
elected president. If so, I shudder to think of the obstacles she will
have to overcome. She will undoubtedly make an infinitely better
president than the zero in the White House right now, but nothing she
does will be good enough. This is a very sad time for the US.

And of course, I'm just saying this because I'm a "liberal". Pure
competence isn't worth a nickel.

  #383  
Old July 18th, 2007, 02:26 AM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.true-crime,alt.tv.tech.hdtv,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Walter Bushell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default 39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.

In article ,
"Matthew L. Martin" wrote:

George Graves wrote:


That alone should be worrisome. There are a lot of people in this country
who
think that Bill Clinton is some kind of Apollo-like god, and will vote for
The Clinton Bitch just to get Billy-boy back. Never mind that the
likelihood
is very strong that Billy WON'T play "First Lady" to The Bitch's
Presidency.
I mean its not like they live together as husband and wife NOW. I've heard
that The Clinton Bitch is a canoe bailer. I don't care,personally
(actually,
it fits her, somehow) but, if that's true and she gets formally "outed",
that
COULD be enough to save the country from her evil talons.


And people wonder why neo-cons are falling like flies. The general
population seems to be fed up with political dialog like that above. How
about discussing issues instead of your fantasies about candidates'
sexual preference.

You do know what an issue is, don't you?

Matthew


Like advice lawyers get, when the facts are on your side pound the
facts, when the law is on your side pound the law, when neither is on
your side -- pound the table.
  #384  
Old July 18th, 2007, 08:39 AM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.true-crime,alt.tv.tech.hdtv,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
George Graves
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:40:34 -0700, sechumlib wrote
(in article ):

On 2007-07-17 19:46:17 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin"

said:

George Graves wrote:


That alone should be worrisome. There are a lot of people in this
country who think that Bill Clinton is some kind of Apollo-like god,
and will vote for The Clinton Bitch just to get Billy-boy back. Never
mind that the likelihood is very strong that Billy WON'T play "First
Lady" to The Bitch's Presidency. I mean its not like they live together
as husband and wife NOW. I've heard that The Clinton Bitch is a canoe
bailer. I don't care,personally (actually, it fits her, somehow) but,
if that's true and she gets formally "outed", that COULD be enough to
save the country from her evil talons.


And people wonder why neo-cons are falling like flies. The general
population seems to be fed up with political dialog like that above.
How about discussing issues instead of your fantasies about candidates'
sexual preference.

You do know what an issue is, don't you?


No, they don't. Clinton-hating trumps all, no matter which Clinton is
involved.

And don't get the idea this is limited to neo-cons. Clinton-hating is a
favorite sport among the near- to far-right wing.

The latest, in the above message, is close to a libel.


No it isn't. I was merely stating that it has been suggested that she is a
lesbian, and if it is true, and comes out during the election, it will hurt
her chances. Like I said above, I don't really care what her sexual
preference is, I wouldn't want that Bitch as my president if she was Mother
Theresa and Xavier Hollander all rolled up in one!

I make the
assumption that "canoe bailer" is another name for a lesbian, though I
don't really know. But the unresisted impulse is to put every possible
stigma on a Clinton, whether he/she deserves it or not. She's probably
considered a "bitch" because she has the chutzpah to run for president,
which no arch-submissive woman of the right kind should do. Assert
yourself, and you're a bitch.


She's not A bitch, she's THE BITCH and the road to an even quicker decline
for this poor benighted Republic of ours.

There is a pretty good chance, at this point, that Hillary will be
elected president.


May the Fates save us!

If so, I shudder to think of the obstacles she will
have to overcome.


Well, it's probably likely that someone will at least try to pop a cap in her
ass, that's for sure. There are people in this country who are simply NOT
ready for either a Woman or a black Muslim in the White house. That's just
common sense.

She will undoubtedly make an infinitely better
president than the zero in the White House right now, but nothing she
does will be good enough. This is a very sad time for the US.



Talk about a dangerous assumption. "She will undoubtedly make an infinitely
better president than the zero in the White House right now..." There is no
way that you can know that, and conventional wisdom says that she will make a
very poor president for a number of reasons: Lack of experience, the fact
that many countries in this world don't like dealing with women leaders (look
at how the Arab nations reacted to Secretary of State Albright. Sending
someone to negotiate with Muslims that was not only a woman, but a Jewess as
well, was not the greatest flash of good judgement on the part of Billy. Of
course, it fits with his lifelong problem with good judgement, but...), etc.

Whether she's better or worse that the clown we've got now, is for time to
decide but I certainly wouldn't bet my country's future on THAT cow.


And of course, I'm just saying this because I'm a "liberal". Pure
competence isn't worth a nickel.


What makes you think that she's competent?

  #385  
Old July 18th, 2007, 08:58 AM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.true-crime,alt.tv.tech.hdtv,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
George Graves
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:46:17 -0700, Matthew L. Martin wrote
(in article ):

George Graves wrote:


That alone should be worrisome. There are a lot of people in this country
who
think that Bill Clinton is some kind of Apollo-like god, and will vote for
The Clinton Bitch just to get Billy-boy back. Never mind that the
likelihood
is very strong that Billy WON'T play "First Lady" to The Bitch's
Presidency.
I mean its not like they live together as husband and wife NOW. I've heard
that The Clinton Bitch is a canoe bailer. I don't care,personally
(actually,
it fits her, somehow) but, if that's true and she gets formally "outed",
that
COULD be enough to save the country from her evil talons.


And people wonder why neo-cons are falling like flies. The general
population seems to be fed up with political dialog like that above. How
about discussing issues instead of your fantasies about candidates'
sexual preference.

You do know what an issue is, don't you?

Matthew



I sure do. The issues add up to a totally new direction for this country.
Unfortunately, The direction that either Democrats or Republicans want the
country to go in are the wrong directions.

  #386  
Old July 18th, 2007, 09:03 AM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.true-crime,alt.tv.tech.hdtv,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
George Graves
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:40:34 -0700, sechumlib wrote
(in article ):

On 2007-07-17 19:46:17 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin"

said:

George Graves wrote:


That alone should be worrisome. There are a lot of people in this
country who think that Bill Clinton is some kind of Apollo-like god,
and will vote for The Clinton Bitch just to get Billy-boy back. Never
mind that the likelihood is very strong that Billy WON'T play "First
Lady" to The Bitch's Presidency. I mean its not like they live together
as husband and wife NOW. I've heard that The Clinton Bitch is a canoe
bailer. I don't care,personally (actually, it fits her, somehow) but,
if that's true and she gets formally "outed", that COULD be enough to
save the country from her evil talons.


And people wonder why neo-cons are falling like flies. The general
population seems to be fed up with political dialog like that above.
How about discussing issues instead of your fantasies about candidates'
sexual preference.

You do know what an issue is, don't you?


No, they don't. Clinton-hating trumps all, no matter which Clinton is
involved.


When we have leaders who do a bad job and want to take the country in
directions that we shouldn't be going, you're damned right I hate those
leaders. Clinton trashed the Presidency. He mad lots of bad decisions and the
country was worse-off when he left office than it was when he took office.
Bush has made it even worse, and The Clinton Bitch, will, in my estimation,
make it worse still (see, I've been following her career, and most of the
things she's in favor of or champions, makes my blood run cold.) Therefore,
it's pretty safe to say, that yeah, I hate the Clintons and I hate Bush, and
I wasn't too fond of his old man.

  #387  
Old July 18th, 2007, 04:12 PM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.true-crime,alt.tv.tech.hdtv,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
sechumlib
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 987
Default 39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.

George Graves wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:40:34 -0700, sechumlib wrote
(in article ):


The latest, in the above message, is close to a libel.



No it isn't. I was merely stating that it has been suggested that she is a
lesbian, and if it is true, and comes out during the election, it will hurt
her chances.


Well, aren't you the Goody Two-Shoes! All sanctimonious about suggesting
near-libelous insulting things.

Like I said above, I don't really care what her sexual
preference is, I wouldn't want that Bitch as my president if she was Mother
Theresa and Xavier Hollander all rolled up in one!

I make the

assumption that "canoe bailer" is another name for a lesbian, though I
don't really know. But the unresisted impulse is to put every possible
stigma on a Clinton, whether he/she deserves it or not. She's probably
considered a "bitch" because she has the chutzpah to run for president,
which no arch-submissive woman of the right kind should do. Assert
yourself, and you're a bitch.



She's not A bitch, she's THE BITCH and the road to an even quicker decline
for this poor benighted Republic of ours.


Nothing like throwing insults around to prove how perceptive you are.
But then, you're just the same as all the rest of the ultra-right-wing
creeps who don't care how competent their chosen ones are, as long as
they are able to subvert any human incentives by government or private
enterprise.
  #388  
Old July 18th, 2007, 04:17 PM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.true-crime,alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.divx,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Dan Luke[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default 39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.


"Hertz Dount" wrote:

You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans.


Back at you, but replace 'Republicans' with 'any democrat'.


Those that support the democrats are not delusional. Those that support
the democrats are brain-dead.



Just dropped in for a minute, but I've got to say that seeing anyone still
supporting the Republicans while calling Democrat supporters "delusional" and
"brain-dead" is the laugh of the day.

Are you guys not up on current events? Oh, wait: talk radio; Fox News.
Right.


--
Dan

"These are exciting times for the Iraqi people!"
- George W. Bush


  #389  
Old July 18th, 2007, 08:31 PM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.true-crime,alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.divx,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Hertz Dount
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default 39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.


"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

"Hertz Dount" wrote:

You're certainly delusional if you support the incompetent Republicans.

Back at you, but replace 'Republicans' with 'any democrat'.


Those that support the democrats are not delusional. Those that support
the democrats are brain-dead.



Just dropped in for a minute, but I've got to say that seeing anyone still
supporting the Republicans while calling Democrat supporters "delusional"
and "brain-dead" is the laugh of the day.


Glad to have given you a laugh.

I suggest you remember what it feel like. If the democrats get into the
White House, no one will be laughing.

Honu


  #390  
Old July 18th, 2007, 09:59 PM posted to rec.travel.usa-canada,alt.true-crime,alt.tv.tech.hdtv,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
George Graves
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default 39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.

On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:12:30 -0700, sechumlib wrote
(in article ):

George Graves wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:40:34 -0700, sechumlib wrote
(in article ):


The latest, in the above message, is close to a libel.



No it isn't. I was merely stating that it has been suggested that she is a
lesbian, and if it is true, and comes out during the election, it will hurt
her chances.


Well, aren't you the Goody Two-Shoes! All sanctimonious about suggesting
near-libelous insulting things.

Like I said above, I don't really care what her sexual
preference is, I wouldn't want that Bitch as my president if she was Mother
Theresa and Xavier Hollander all rolled up in one!

I make the

assumption that "canoe bailer" is another name for a lesbian, though I
don't really know. But the unresisted impulse is to put every possible
stigma on a Clinton, whether he/she deserves it or not. She's probably
considered a "bitch" because she has the chutzpah to run for president,
which no arch-submissive woman of the right kind should do. Assert
yourself, and you're a bitch.



She's not A bitch, she's THE BITCH and the road to an even quicker decline
for this poor benighted Republic of ours.


Nothing like throwing insults around to prove how perceptive you are.
But then, you're just the same as all the rest of the ultra-right-wing
creeps who don't care how competent their chosen ones are, as long as
they are able to subvert any human incentives by government or private
enterprise.


And you are just the same as all the rest of the ultra-left-wing creeps who
care only for some socialist, one-world liberal utopia where no-one has any
rights, any hope or any aspirations. All anybody will have is a "benevolent"
world totalitarian government that tells everybody what to think and what to
do, and in return feeds you (poorly) and takes care of your every need (also
poorly) from the cradle to the grave.

Now that we've each mischaracterized each other's political views to the
point of utter absurdity, what now?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bush performance ratings by Americans polarized by income status PJ O'Donovan[_1_] Europe 9 March 22nd, 2007 11:24 AM
BUSH KEEPS AMERICANS FROM TRAVELLING. Victor Moralez Europe 10 March 14th, 2007 12:12 AM
Bush chaos: Americans should sue Carole Allen Europe 2 March 5th, 2005 10:08 AM
HOW TO UNDERSTAND AMERICANS, AMERICA, AND GEORGE W. BUSH anonymouse Europe 0 November 5th, 2004 09:57 PM
Haiti, RCL/CCL, Bush, Bush and Travel/Cruising. Cruising Chrissy Caribbean 1 February 24th, 2004 02:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.