FBI: Flight Diverted After NYC Woman Lights Up

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:48:11 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote:

John Kulp writes:

Sure. That's why all the passengers are willing to pay what it costs
to transports themselves right now so none of the airlines are in
financial trouble. You really know nothing about the airline business
do you?

Nobody unaddicted to alcohol is likely to choose a flight or class based on
the availability of alcohol.

Well, according to plenty of posters here they do or did you miss the
carrying on about whether an airline serves free drinks or not is what
they look for when choosing a carrier?

John Kulp writes:

Well, according to plenty of posters here they do or did you miss the
carrying on about whether an airline serves free drinks or not is what
they look for when choosing a carrier?

Plenty of posters? How many?

The usual criterion of choice is price. Most passengers have virtually no
other criteria besides that, although they must perceive the flight as safe,
usually. All flights are non-smoking, now, and yet people are still flying,
including smokers.

John Kulp writes:

Because they're not allowed to genius.

Then perhaps they should be prohibited from serving alcohol as well. I know
of some flight crew members who would welcome such a change.

So, if someone gets a headache they shouldn't give them an aspirin
then genius?

Are there airlines that actually sell aspirin aboard flights?

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
John Kulp writes:

Because they're not allowed to genius.

Then perhaps they should be prohibited from serving alcohol as well.
I know of some flight crew members who would welcome such a change.

So, if someone gets a headache they shouldn't give them an aspirin
then genius?

Are there airlines that actually sell aspirin aboard flights?


I've been on several flights where the FAs gave (not sell, you moron)
aspirin to passengers who asked for them. Only in your brain dead world of
MSFS does that not happen. You're an blithering idiot, Anthony.

"John Kulp" wrote in message
...

What I said was a guess.

Which is as close as you will ever get to being accurate. You're so
stupid that you would take the word of some FA on one flight and
assume it's accurate. Hmm. Let's see. You board a morning shuttle
flight between Boston and Washington, ask the FA how many drinks she
served on the flight and take that as an accurate projection of how
many are served on all flights. Everyone knows that people drink as
much on 1 hour flights as they do on transcontinental flights.
Everyone knows that people drink as much for breakfast as they do
later in the day. Etc., etc. This surprises no one who sees your
ignorant blathering, but don't let that slow you down. And never mind
that this costs the airline no more anyway because they are serving
other drinks as well, so why not? Completely stupid.

HAHAAHAHAHA! What a RANT!! Did I strike a nerve, or did the short bus hit
a bump and wake you up?


guess - verb
1. to arrive at or commit oneself to an opinion about (something)
without having sufficient evidence to support the opinion fully

Looks like someone needs a course in reading comprehension.


And a diversion is extremely rare.

The total cost still may be surprising.

To who? You?

Damn right! I was suprised. You on the other hand, know it all, so
maybe
not to you.

It's no surprise to anyone but you that the pilot is captain of his
plane and can take it wherever he thinks appropriate in circumstances
like this. Just demonstrates once more how little you know about the
airline business. Which also surprises no one that sees the drivel
you post.

Yes John-John the captain can do what he wants. You're a real Einstein.
It's no surprise that you have no idea what you are reading. And *your*
drivel has no connection to "cost of a diversion". It's obvious who the
moron is here.

Yeah, you. These incidents causing diversions are so rare that, when
spread over the number of flights flown every day, which are
thousands, much less yearly, they are infintesimal and important only
to an ignorant moron like you.

Wellllll - yer back on the track. You argued and insulted over this for
days, and *now* you don't care. Yer a real jewel, skippy. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Insert witty last word here._________________________________________.

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:04:51 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote:

John Kulp writes:

Well, according to plenty of posters here they do or did you miss the
carrying on about whether an airline serves free drinks or not is what
they look for when choosing a carrier?

Plenty of posters? How many?

Go back and count them yourself.


The usual criterion of choice is price. Most passengers have virtually no
other criteria besides that, although they must perceive the flight as safe,
usually. All flights are non-smoking, now, and yet people are still flying,
including smokers.

Because they have no choice genius. It's the law. And it's the law
they can drink, and they do. Included in the price in FC and for sale
in the back on many these days.

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:05:55 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote:

John Kulp writes:

Because they're not allowed to genius.

Then perhaps they should be prohibited from serving alcohol as well. I know
of some flight crew members who would welcome such a change.

So why don't you take a vote of all airline passengers and see if they
want that? You probably will find at least 5 out of millions that
will agree with your absurd views.


So, if someone gets a headache they shouldn't give them an aspirin
then genius?

Are there airlines that actually sell aspirin aboard flights?

No, that's free for the unfortunates who end up sitting next to you on
a flight.

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:07:52 +0200 (CEST), Buster Hymen
wrote:

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
John Kulp writes:

Because they're not allowed to genius.

Then perhaps they should be prohibited from serving alcohol as well.
I know of some flight crew members who would welcome such a change.

So, if someone gets a headache they shouldn't give them an aspirin
then genius?

Are there airlines that actually sell aspirin aboard flights?


I've been on several flights where the FAs gave (not sell, you moron)
aspirin to passengers who asked for them. Only in your brain dead world of
MSFS does that not happen. You're an blithering idiot, Anthony.


Isn't he though? Just another idiot who would like to impose his
stupid views on everyone else.

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:08:59 -0500, "Jim Davis"
wrote:

"John Kulp" wrote in message
...

What I said was a guess.

Which is as close as you will ever get to being accurate. You're so
stupid that you would take the word of some FA on one flight and
assume it's accurate. Hmm. Let's see. You board a morning shuttle
flight between Boston and Washington, ask the FA how many drinks she
served on the flight and take that as an accurate projection of how
many are served on all flights. Everyone knows that people drink as
much on 1 hour flights as they do on transcontinental flights.
Everyone knows that people drink as much for breakfast as they do
later in the day. Etc., etc. This surprises no one who sees your
ignorant blathering, but don't let that slow you down. And never mind
that this costs the airline no more anyway because they are serving
other drinks as well, so why not? Completely stupid.

HAHAAHAHAHA! What a RANT!! Did I strike a nerve, or did the short bus hit
a bump and wake you up?

Meaning you are so stupid as to do a survey like this.



guess - verb
1. to arrive at or commit oneself to an opinion about (something)
without having sufficient evidence to support the opinion fully

Looks like someone needs a course in reading comprehension.


And a diversion is extremely rare.

The total cost still may be surprising.

To who? You?

Damn right! I was suprised. You on the other hand, know it all, so
maybe
not to you.

It's no surprise to anyone but you that the pilot is captain of his
plane and can take it wherever he thinks appropriate in circumstances
like this. Just demonstrates once more how little you know about the
airline business. Which also surprises no one that sees the drivel
you post.

Yes John-John the captain can do what he wants. You're a real Einstein.
It's no surprise that you have no idea what you are reading. And *your*
drivel has no connection to "cost of a diversion". It's obvious who the
moron is here.

Yeah, you. These incidents causing diversions are so rare that, when
spread over the number of flights flown every day, which are
thousands, much less yearly, they are infintesimal and important only
to an ignorant moron like you.

Wellllll - yer back on the track. You argued and insulted over this for
days, and *now* you don't care. Yer a real jewel, skippy. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Insert witty last word here.your a hopeless moron. How's that for the last word?__.

(John Kulp) wrote in
:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 23:07:52 +0200 (CEST), Buster Hymen
wrote:

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
John Kulp writes:

Because they're not allowed to genius.

Then perhaps they should be prohibited from serving alcohol as well.
I know of some flight crew members who would welcome such a change.

So, if someone gets a headache they shouldn't give them an aspirin
then genius?

Are there airlines that actually sell aspirin aboard flights?


I've been on several flights where the FAs gave (not sell, you moron)
aspirin to passengers who asked for them. Only in your brain dead
world of MSFS does that not happen. You're an blithering idiot,
Anthony.


Isn't he though? Just another idiot who would like to impose his
stupid views on everyone else.


That would be an improvement over the dumb ass fjuktard that Anthony really
his. He is a life loser who can't hold a job despite his claim of superior
education, intelligence, etc. He is an ex-pat American who lives in Paris
and survives on handouts from friends. His claimed income is about half of
what a teenage high school dropout can earn at McDonald's.