US bloggers, again, expose Left Wing propaganda machine- Reuters altering photos

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n

On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" wrote:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n

What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.

It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
even.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--

Dave Frightens Me wrote:

On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" wrote:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n

What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.

It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
even.

Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
generalised term of abuse.

I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
he is dishonest.

--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/

"Padraig Breathnach" wrote in message
...
Dave Frightens Me wrote:

On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" wrote:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n

What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.

It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
even.

Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
generalised term of abuse.

I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
he is dishonest.

--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/

He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you have
to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.

"John Rennie" wrote in message
...


snip

He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.


Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
of 'free speech". In that case you are stuck with him

"John Rennie" wrote:

"John Rennie" wrote in message
...


snip

He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.

He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
great deal more.

Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
of 'free speech".

Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
on usenet.

In that case you are stuck with him

Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.

Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
nutters.

--
PB
The return address has been MUNGED
My travel writing: http://www.iol.ie/~draoi/

"Padraig Breathnach" wrote in message
...
"John Rennie" wrote:

"John Rennie" wrote in message
...


snip

He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate you.

He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
great deal more.

Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an abrogation
of 'free speech".

Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
on usenet.

In that case you are stuck with him

Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.

Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
nutters.

--
PB

Divert his attention to his world travels and his luxurious lifestyle. Be
prepared to be so so envious.

He is OT in the Europe travel group, but so are constantly 3 to 4 others and
padraig never complains.
Why him ???
I agree about the killfile that martin wants so many others to use, but not
him !


"John Rennie" a écrit dans le message de news:
...

"Padraig Breathnach" wrote in message
...
"John Rennie" wrote:

"John Rennie" wrote in message
...


snip

He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate
you.

He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
great deal more.

Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an
abrogation
of 'free speech".

Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
on usenet.

In that case you are stuck with him

Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.

Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
nutters.

--
PB

Divert his attention to his world travels and his luxurious lifestyle.
Be prepared to be so so envious.

Padraig Breathnach wrote:

Dave Frightens Me wrote:

On 6 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0700, "PJ O'Donovan" wrote:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...6966,00.html#n

What a load of rubbish. This is no proof of any "Left Wing propaganda
machine" but just a very shoddy doctoring of an image by someone who
was obviously wanting it to be noticed as such.

It could well have been a right winger trying to discredit the left
even.

Where is there left or right wing in this? Peej uses "left wing" as a
generalised term of abuse.

I think he should **** off. He is off-topic in r.t.e.; he is trolling;
he is dishonest.


Earl and Donna are gone so he turns his attentions to rte....

--
Best
Greg

gRunge bored us with:

He is OT in the Europe travel group, but so are constantly 3 to 4 others and
padraig never complains.
Why him ???
I agree about the killfile that martin wants so many others to use, but not
him !


Stop whingeing gRunge, no one "cares" what you "think"...

--
Best
Greg



"John Rennie" a écrit dans le message de news:
...

"Padraig Breathnach" wrote in message
...
"John Rennie" wrote:

"John Rennie" wrote in message
...


snip

He's also an imbecile and our (a.a.d-p.) resident fantasist. All you
have to do, Padraig, is killfile him and he will cease to aggravate
you.

He doesn't really aggravate me. A persistent gnat would annoy me a
great deal more.

Sorry. I've read your other post. You consider killfiling an
abrogation
of 'free speech".

Not really: I'm echoing sentiments expressed by others in recent
discussions involving Peej. But, as it happens, I don't use killfiles
on usenet.

In that case you are stuck with him

Thanks for your concern, John. I'll continue to use my freedoms.
Useful, in the case of Peej: 1. not to listen; 2. if I listen, not to
take him seriously; 3. if I respond, to express myself robustly.

Saying that he should **** off has an enjoyable effect on other usenet
nutters.

--
PB

Divert his attention to his world travels and his luxurious lifestyle.
Be prepared to be so so envious.