hookers in china

On Jan 27, 3:28 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
" wrote:
On Jan 27, 7:07 wrote:



On Jan 27, 5:52 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 27, 2:14 wrote:

On Jan 26, 12:48 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:00 wrote:

On Jan 25, 11:46 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 25, 6:28 wrote:

On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:

On Jan 25, 4:38 pm, KLguy282 wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

There is a way to get around that tomorrow though - it's easy - if you
consider your children as an extension of yourself. They're the
receptacle of your genes afterall. So sire a kid with someone outside
your race. Then your children (or grandchildren) will not be a
Chinaman, only 1/2, 1/4 etc. You mentioned you had family members
doing that (interestingly only to whites, and not to blacks, but who
can blame them, right? For Asians if they outmarry whites are the most
desirable, while blacks the least). Their kids and grandkids will not
be considered Chinaman. So there is always hope.

there's going to be a blackpresidentsoon, if not in 09, then in
2013. there's already a black secretary of state. there will never
be a chinamanpresidentin our lifetimes. probably in our grandkid's
lifetimes.

There'll never be a black leader in China's lifetime.

(Not to insult some posters' intelligence here [not referring to you,
doctor] but I mean the above as precisely penned.)

you can even read. I was not talking president of china; i'm talking
about president of USA.
1) china doesn't even have a chinese president -- china has NO
legitimate president; it's a CCP unelected dictatorship.
2) USA will soon, if not this year, within 10 years, have black
president, hispanic president, and female president. but it will not
have an chinese-american president. this reflects that inside USA,
chinese has the lowest pecking order, below blacks, hispanics, and
native americans, bwaaaahahahaha.

I said leader, not president. Besides, the same caveat of China
applies: "there'll be no black leader in China's lifetime" can be
extrapolated to 'there'll be no black leader in America's lifetime'.
For many Americans, America as they know it may, in the annals of
history, merely turn out to be a historical interlude. America is fast
becoming Brazil, with more and more third world slums and favelas and
inner cities stratified according to a color continuum. This trend to
likely accelerate in the 21st century with differential fertility
rates and mass immigration. The death knell will be when more and more
black or Hispanic politicians dishing out the dole to the underclass,
throttling the economically competent, monkey-wrenching the political
cogwheels in the process, while black and Hispanic engage in de facto
civil war.

brazil his 10 times the per capita income of china, my friend, and is
one of the fastest rising emerging BRIC countries. Brazil is becoming
america, not the other way around.

Wrong answer again. You're pretty stupid for a 'doctor' by citing
these stats. Check out this graph on the GDP of "rich" Brazil versus
third world poor China:

http://i31.tinypic.com/fcp3zs.jpg

Is Brazil going anywhere?????????

I bet Brazil would be a much more successful country if it's not
shackled by its darker-skinned segment of the population.

yeah, what's your point? your graph shows that brazil has ALWAYS been
richer than china -- even in 2004 when brazil was in recession/
inflation mode. Since 2004, brazil has experienced astonishing
revival, pulling itself further ahead of china. china, with all the
"hype" and bragging about its growth, is still lagging darkie brazil,
bwaaahaahahahahaha.

So you agree that Brazil is stagnant.

http://i31.tinypic.com/fcp3zs.jpg

Bwahahah!!!!!!! Bwahahahahahahahahaa!!!!!!

And here's the question: where's Brazil going? Look at the graph
again. Why is Brazil not going anywhere? Why is the gap between third
world poor spitting China closing up with mixed-raced Brazil?

Oh wait, let's see. Brazil has since changed. OK, here's your
homework, doctor. I presented data above. Can you please post some
2004-2008 data for all of us posters? You're the doc, right? So please
please please please PLease!!! We'd like to know, we're hungry for
knowledge. Where's that 2004 Brazilian inflection point that you're
talking about, that Brazil is suddenly surging ahead, overcome by this
inertia or whatever? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!

One more thing. Let's face it, "doctor". South America can be a much
better place without blacks. Why do you think South America needs
blacks anyway? For manual labor? Japanese never need blacks, NE Asia
never need blacks. I think without blacks they do better - they are
free to invent robotic technology for instance in response to
necessity and whether you like it or not blacks don't seem to add much
value to society. Or are you now trying to tell us how blacks are so
indispensible? (That's a rhetoric question!!)

On Jan 27, 7:07 am, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 27, 5:52 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD



" wrote:
On Jan 27, 2:14 am, RichAsianKid wrote:

On Jan 26, 12:48 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:00 wrote:

On Jan 25, 11:46 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 25, 6:28 wrote:

On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:

On Jan 25, 4:38 pm, KLguy282 wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

There is a way to get around that tomorrow though - it's easy - if you
consider your children as an extension of yourself. They're the
receptacle of your genes afterall. So sire a kid with someone outside
your race. Then your children (or grandchildren) will not be a
Chinaman, only 1/2, 1/4 etc. You mentioned you had family members
doing that (interestingly only to whites, and not to blacks, but who
can blame them, right? For Asians if they outmarry whites are the most
desirable, while blacks the least). Their kids and grandkids will not
be considered Chinaman. So there is always hope.

there's going to be a blackpresidentsoon, if not in 09, then in
2013. there's already a black secretary of state. there will never
be a chinamanpresidentin our lifetimes. probably in our grandkid's
lifetimes.

There'll never be a black leader in China's lifetime.

(Not to insult some posters' intelligence here [not referring to you,
doctor] but I mean the above as precisely penned.)

you can even read. I was not talking president of china; i'm talking
about president of USA.
1) china doesn't even have a chinese president -- china has NO
legitimate president; it's a CCP unelected dictatorship.
2) USA will soon, if not this year, within 10 years, have black
president, hispanic president, and female president. but it will not
have an chinese-american president. this reflects that inside USA,
chinese has the lowest pecking order, below blacks, hispanics, and
native americans, bwaaaahahahaha.

I said leader, not president. Besides, the same caveat of China
applies: "there'll be no black leader in China's lifetime" can be
extrapolated to 'there'll be no black leader in America's lifetime'.
For many Americans, America as they know it may, in the annals of
history, merely turn out to be a historical interlude. America is fast
becoming Brazil, with more and more third world slums and favelas and
inner cities stratified according to a color continuum. This trend to
likely accelerate in the 21st century with differential fertility
rates and mass immigration. The death knell will be when more and more
black or Hispanic politicians dishing out the dole to the underclass,
throttling the economically competent, monkey-wrenching the political
cogwheels in the process, while black and Hispanic engage in de facto
civil war.

brazil his 10 times the per capita income of china, my friend, and is
one of the fastest rising emerging BRIC countries. Brazil is becoming
america, not the other way around.

Wrong answer again. You're pretty stupid for a 'doctor' by citing
these stats. Check out this graph on the GDP of "rich" Brazil versus
third world poor China:

http://i31.tinypic.com/fcp3zs.jpg

Is Brazil going anywhere?????????

I bet Brazil would be a much more successful country if it's not
shackled by its darker-skinned segment of the population.

yeah, right. Next, you're gonna tell us that a jackie chan movie
would be much better without the black fellow -- you know, the funny
man who exudes some PERSONALITY. The key to success of any jackie
chan movie is the personable black man. No black man -- no americans
wanna watch.

Japanese never need blacks, NE Asia
never need blacks.

1) first, japanese had koreans and cheap chinese laborers, which are
almost (but not quite) as good as blacks
2) second, japanese economy has been in deep recession since 1988,
bwaahahahahhaa. they cannot bootstrap themselves out because everyone
is like a robot marching in homogenous lock-step.


I think without blacks they do better - they are
free to invent robotic technology for instance in response to
necessity and whether you like it or not blacks don't seem to add much
value to society. Or are you now trying to tell us how blacks are so
indispensible?

I'd like to see jackie chan replace the indispensible black man in his
movies with a robot.
sometimes jackie can replace the black man with a funny white man.
but if jackie costar with another chinese man, you bet movie is 100%
failure!!!!

On Jan 27, 2:09 pm, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 27, 3:31 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD



" wrote:
On Jan 27, 7:11 wrote:

On Jan 27, 5:53 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 27, 2:17 wrote:

On Jan 26, 12:39 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
Yes, blacks do worse off than native Americans. Check out this from
the reputable Journal of Black Higher Education. On the 2005 SAT:

http://www.jbhe.com/images/issue49/c...ions_test1.gif

Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
SAT-M + SAT-V.

the ONLY activity asians can claim superiority is test-taking and
saving money. blacks are superior in culture, music, sports,
politics, scoring with babes, looks, HAPPINESS, and being americans.

You forgot that blacks are also superior in incaceration rates, being
doped up, poverty, murder, and rape!

i bet given a vote between a black and chinaman president, Americans
would vote black 95% of the time.

White americans have no reason to vote for a black president - they
should vote white - it's in their own best interest.

white americans have a a dream, where black boy and black girls can
play equally in the playground. you chinaman don't understand this
dream. that's why america will always surge ahead to be a far greater
country than china, stuck in the ancient confuscious thinking, ever
can be.

Tell us doctor why should smart white Americans mingle with dumb black
Americans? I don't think it's just chinaman who don't understand but
Asians or, oh, say, Israeli Jews, will not understand this either.
Japanese have robots to take care of domestic chores for instance, so
please tell us why is it that whites in America have to put up with
this crap about the virtues of diversity?

smart white americans comingle with beautiful smart black americans.
like jackie chan try to mingle with black movie stars to turn is C
grade chinaman kung fu fighting movies into A grade.
C grade movie + black movie star = A grade movie

The black is
retarded as usual, while the Chinese is dyslexic....or at any rate
can't speak.

no, you are wrong, my friend. the chinese is dumb robot, whose high
test scores can be replaced by a japanese robot. but let's see
jackie chan replace the superstar black comedian in his movies with a
chinese who scored perfect on his GRE and MCAT. bwaahahahahahaha

On Jan 25, 10:48 pm, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:55 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
in fact in virtually every society around the world they do worse off
than the native population be it Canada, be it the UK, be it their
homeland, i.e. Africa? Why is that?

native? canada's native population are illiterate indians and eskimos
-- who migrated from asia.
america's native population is indians, who run casinos. who is more
successful in america? blacks or american indians?

who are the most successful chinese? it's the hong kongers, who are
mixed race. their blood includes sailors and slave sailors from
europe and north africa, who are black.

Yes, blacks do worse off than native Americans. Check out this from
the reputable Journal of Black Higher Education. On the 2005 SAT:

http://www.jbhe.com/images/issue49/c...ions_test1.gif

Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
SAT-M + SAT-V.

Tough, huh?

racistasiankid, your philosophy matches hitlers exactly -- except that
hilter would not like you because you're not aryan. are you aiming to
be the chinese hitler?

On Jan 25, 10:48 pm, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:55 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
in fact in virtually every society around the world they do worse off
than the native population be it Canada, be it the UK, be it their
homeland, i.e. Africa? Why is that?

native? canada's native population are illiterate indians and eskimos
-- who migrated from asia.
america's native population is indians, who run casinos. who is more
successful in america? blacks or american indians?

who are the most successful chinese? it's the hong kongers, who are
mixed race. their blood includes sailors and slave sailors from
europe and north africa, who are black.

Yes, blacks do worse off than native Americans. Check out this from
the reputable Journal of Black Higher Education. On the 2005 SAT:

http://www.jbhe.com/images/issue49/c...ions_test1.gif

Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
SAT-M + SAT-V.

caroline kennedy endorses obama. she has vision for the future.

Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
SAT-M + SAT-V.

what do scores prove? chinese score highest on USA's SAT scores. but
china his lower per capita income than brazil and 250 million peasants
in poverty. and chinese students can't speakee englisheee even though
they boast a perfect score in toeffl. and the american student with
the lower GRE score does much better in the graduate program.

Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD wrote:

[...] and the american student with
the lower GRE score does much better in the graduate program.

Reference?

Tak
--
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----
Tak To x
--------------------------------------------------------------------^^
[taode takto ~{LU5B~}] NB: trim the xx to get my real email addr

On Jan 29, 1:41 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
" wrote:
Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
SAT-M + SAT-V.

what do scores prove? chinese score highest on USA's SAT scores. but
china his lower per capita income than brazil and 250 million peasants
in poverty. and chinese students can't speakee englisheee even though
they boast a perfect score in toeffl. and the american student with
the lower GRE score does much better in the graduate program.


http://i25.tinypic.com/v5e9hj.jpg

Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!! If you have a black and a white together getting
the SAME combined SAT score, the black underperforms. Isn't that sad?

And I'd like to know how successful subsaharan African is. People say
Kenya is one of the most successful East African countries, and the
GDP is a pathetic $1600 US per capita!! In other words, it's even
lower than India's GDP per capita!!!!