hookers in china

On Jan 25, 9:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
On Jan 25, 12:48 am, KLguy282 wrote:



On Jan 24, 1:43 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

Same genetic stock as in general racial type.

But it is most definitely true that Southerners are the original Han ,
not the present day north who as RAK said are muchul mix monkeys.

The Cantonese are true descendants of the Han / Tang / Ming no doubt
about that , thta's why we call ourselves - " Tong Yen " - people of
the Tang .

You dont hear so called northerners call them selves " Tang ren " do
you .

When the original Han/Canto moved to the South they drove the Yue
( Thai tupe people ) from their homelands and the south ( Yuetnam ..
Vietnam ) and west Yu... nan .

AS conquerors , many lower ranking han officers took Yue women as
concubines , whereas the higher ranks took their own women from the
North with them.

Many Canto are descendant from pure original Han stock , you can
tell , we are the white type like me .

Canto is much closer to original Chinese than Mandarin , which ws
modified to suit the Munchol conquerors.

The past is the past, and leave the past to the history book. Who
care about "Han ren" or "Tang ren". Today, we call them "Chinese".

there is no such ethnicity as "chinese". The "chinese people" is a
political invention created by CCP to justify their power. The true
ethnic groups are hong ren, mongols, turks, etc etcetera. Take your
basic anthropology/biology class, man!

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

this shows how little you understand about AMERICAN history. the
word "chinamen" is used by americans to refer to cantonese-speaking
coolies from guanzhou region -- tong ren. if you don't speak
cantonese, your not a true chinaman in american english. You are a
pekingnese mongoloid or a gook.

On Jan 25, 6:28 pm, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:



On Jan 25, 4:38 pm, KLguy282 wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

There is a way to get around that tomorrow though - it's easy - if you
consider your children as an extension of yourself. They're the
receptacle of your genes afterall. So sire a kid with someone outside
your race. Then your children (or grandchildren) will not be a
Chinaman, only 1/2, 1/4 etc. You mentioned you had family members
doing that (interestingly only to whites, and not to blacks, but who
can blame them, right? For Asians if they outmarry whites are the most
desirable, while blacks the least). Their kids and grandkids will not
be considered Chinaman. So there is always hope.

no, one drop of chinaman blood makes your who chain chinaman. one
drop.

On Jan 25, 6:28 pm, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:



On Jan 25, 4:38 pm, KLguy282 wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

There is a way to get around that tomorrow though - it's easy - if you
consider your children as an extension of yourself. They're the
receptacle of your genes afterall. So sire a kid with someone outside
your race. Then your children (or grandchildren) will not be a
Chinaman, only 1/2, 1/4 etc. You mentioned you had family members
doing that (interestingly only to whites, and not to blacks, but who
can blame them, right? For Asians if they outmarry whites are the most
desirable, while blacks the least). Their kids and grandkids will not
be considered Chinaman. So there is always hope.

there's going to be a black president soon, if not in 09, then in
2013. there's already a black secretary of state. there will never
be a chinaman president in our lifetimes. probably in our grandkid's
lifetimes.

Asian 60.8%
White - 41.3%
Black 35.39%

IQ is not everything, one dimensional kid.
If they measure in athletic ability:
Asian = 1%
White = 41%
Black = 94%

Social awareness, popularity:
Asian = negative 98%
White = 15%
Black = 75%

Popular Music ability:
Asian = 4%
White = 25%
Black = 80%

Ability to woo babes:
Asian = 0%
White = 5%
Black = 92%

Leadership/Political ability:
Asian = 1%
White = 10%
Black = 98%

Acting ability and Fun to chat with:
Asian = -25%
White = 0%
Black = +35%

in fact in virtually every society around the world they do worse off
than the native population be it Canada, be it the UK, be it their
homeland, i.e. Africa? Why is that?

native? canada's native population are illiterate indians and eskimos
-- who migrated from asia.
america's native population is indians, who run casinos. who is more
successful in america? blacks or american indians?

who are the most successful chinese? it's the hong kongers, who are
mixed race. their blood includes sailors and slave sailors from
europe and north africa, who are black.

On Jan 25, 11:53 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
" wrote:
Asian 60.8%
White - 41.3%
Black 35.39%

IQ is not everything, one dimensional kid.
If they measure in athletic ability:
Asian = 1%
White = 41%
Black = 94%

Social awareness, popularity:
Asian = negative 98%
White = 15%
Black = 75%

Popular Music ability:
Asian = 4%
White = 25%
Black = 80%

Ability to woo babes:
Asian = 0%
White = 5%
Black = 92%

Leadership/Political ability:
Asian = 1%
White = 10%
Black = 98%

Acting ability and Fun to chat with:
Asian = -25%
White = 0%
Black = +35%

Fake numbers! You know how we know this, doctor? There are negative
numbers here! And if you insist that these numbers are not fake, then
please kindly provide a reference for all of us. I've posted my
reference above for my numbers, as well as the table. Which journal
are these numbers published in? What table? In *.jpg please. Come on,
your credibility is at stake here!

Also, one very important point here. Note that Dr. Humperdink is
telling us that blacks outscore Asians in all these indices. Well,
look closer. Blacks *also* outscore whites in precisely all these
indices. No white internet poster (especially with their libertarian
bent, as those are the typical demographic on the internet) will ever
be afflicted with such self-flagellating hatred.

It seems that our resident doctor (pun intended!) is now stuck in a
position where he has to defend not only just how blacks are doing
better than Asians, but also doing better than whites. I'm sure we'll
all look forward to that.

PS - perhaps inadvertently he may also have confirmed the so-called r-
K theory in biology where blacks and Asians reside on opposite ends of
the spectrum on a whole range of biological indices. Perhaps that's
why he's a doctor afterall. Bwahahahahahaaaaaaa!!!!!

On Jan 25, 11:55 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
" wrote:
in fact in virtually every society around the world they do worse off
than the native population be it Canada, be it the UK, be it their
homeland, i.e. Africa? Why is that?

native? canada's native population are illiterate indians and eskimos
-- who migrated from asia.
america's native population is indians, who run casinos. who is more
successful in america? blacks or american indians?

who are the most successful chinese? it's the hong kongers, who are
mixed race. their blood includes sailors and slave sailors from
europe and north africa, who are black.


Yes, blacks do worse off than native Americans. Check out this from
the reputable Journal of Black Higher Education. On the 2005 SAT:

http://www.jbhe.com/images/issue49/c...ions_test1.gif

Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
SAT-M + SAT-V.

Tough, huh?

On Jan 25, 11:44 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
" wrote:
On Jan 25, 6:28 wrote:



On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:

On Jan 25, 4:38 pm, KLguy282 wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

There is a way to get around that tomorrow though - it's easy - if you
consider your children as an extension of yourself. They're the
receptacle of your genes afterall. So sire a kid with someone outside
your race. Then your children (or grandchildren) will not be a
Chinaman, only 1/2, 1/4 etc. You mentioned you had family members
doing that (interestingly only to whites, and not to blacks, but who
can blame them, right? For Asians if they outmarry whites are the most
desirable, while blacks the least). Their kids and grandkids will not
be considered Chinaman. So there is always hope.

no, one drop of chinaman blood makes your who chain chinaman. one
drop.

Oh really?????!!!!!! Wow!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm shocked, shocked shocked!!!!!
You're now proposing that if a Chinaman marries a black, then their
offspring will become a Chinaman????????

Didn't you just concede to everyone here the ultra-potency of
Chinaman's blood?

On Jan 25, 11:46 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
" wrote:
On Jan 25, 6:28 wrote:



On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:

On Jan 25, 4:38 pm, KLguy282 wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

There is a way to get around that tomorrow though - it's easy - if you
consider your children as an extension of yourself. They're the
receptacle of your genes afterall. So sire a kid with someone outside
your race. Then your children (or grandchildren) will not be a
Chinaman, only 1/2, 1/4 etc. You mentioned you had family members
doing that (interestingly only to whites, and not to blacks, but who
can blame them, right? For Asians if they outmarry whites are the most
desirable, while blacks the least). Their kids and grandkids will not
be considered Chinaman. So there is always hope.

there's going to be a black president soon, if not in 09, then in
2013. there's already a black secretary of state. there will never
be a chinaman president in our lifetimes. probably in our grandkid's
lifetimes.

There'll never be a black leader in China's lifetime.

(Not to insult some posters' intelligence here [not referring to you,
doctor] but I mean the above as precisely penned.)