If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#341
|
|||
|
|||
39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.
On 2007-07-16 13:00:16 -0400, sechumlib said:
I'd hate to have to count the number of presidents who were adulterous. Some that immediately come to mind are Jefferson, Jackson, Harding, FD Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Nixon. Not to mention Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, whom I conveniently forgot. |
#342
|
|||
|
|||
39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.
On 2007-07-16 14:01:10 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said:
"Hatunen" wrote in message .. I have seen it said that at one point Warren Harding's secret service men kept Mrs Hardng at bay outside the oval office while the prez hid his mistress, Nan Britton, in a closet. Did he lie about it to the SCOTUS, Congress, and go on National TV and lie to every single person alive in the U.S. at that moment? He wasn't asked by people who just wanted to catch him at something they could persecute him about. In those days, voyeurs didn't go quite as far as they do today and life was (arguably) better in that respect. Now, will you please quit repeating, rerepeating and rererepeating yourself and go back to your hole? |
#343
|
|||
|
|||
39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:58:32 -1000, "Hertz Dount"
wrote: "Hatunen" wrote in message .. . I expect there has been similarly broad lying by presdent in the past, but probably on different subjects. I know of no president, other than Clinton, who deliberately and repeatedly lied to the citizens of this county. I know of no president, that when caught with DNA evidence linking him to a crime tried to change the meaning of a word in the English language I know of no ther president, save for perhaps Richard Nixon, who displayed such a lack of integrity as did Clinton. You are aware, aren't you, that Clinton hasn't been president for some six-plus years now? Isn't it about time you changed dead horses? -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN ) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps * |
#344
|
|||
|
|||
39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.
"Hertz Dount" wrote in message news:2qqdnc4U_9Z0IgbbnZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d@hawaiiantel. net... "Hatunen" wrote in message ... On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:57:51 -1000, "Hertz Dount" wrote: "Hatunen" wrote in message ... On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:11:47 -1000, "Hertz Dount" wrote: "Hatunen" wrote in message om... On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 20:17:27 -0400, sechumlib wrote: On 2007-07-14 17:45:42 -0400, Hatunen said: You're willfully ignoring all attempts to tell you what "impeahc" means. Hatunen, don't you really think your efforts are hopeless? The stuff you're responding to is by people who are determined to show that Clinton was a blackguard, and they accept the very political impeachment by the House as authentic proof that he was guilty. They are going to find him guilty no matter what idiocy, or lack of it, is involved in their reasoning. They are Clinton-haters, pure and simple. The world is full of Clinton-haters and their ilk. They aren't interested in truth, only in spin. I think it's time to start ignoring them. If I believed in a deity, I would pray to him to help me do that. May you be stronger than I am. I don't post with any hope changing the minds of people like that; I do want other readers who may not understand impeachment to get a clue as to what's really meant. Someone told me at lunch today that they were watching Bill Moyers and there were people on the show who represented a serious attempt to impeach Bush. I asked how many Congressman they had on their side? I was told "maybe one". I said, in that case it is NOT a serious attempt to impeach Bush. You have no hope because you think it is perfectly acceptable for a president to lie. Please quote where I said, or implied, any such thing. You think is is perfectly acceptable for a president to be adulterous. No I don't. I only said that Clinton was the first to get a lot of publicity about it. I suspect the Gary Hart affair triggered the press into being less protective. You have no hope because you fail to realize that anyone that would lie on the scale that Clinton did, and do what he did *IN THE WHOTE HOUSE* has no morals at all. None. Yet you continue to perceive him as some kind of Knight in Shining Armor. Do you honestly thing Clinton has been the only president who ever lied while President? You are sijmply too naive for words. All I ask is that you stop spouting legal nonsense. Lied to the SCOTUS, Congress and every citizen of the U.S., intentionally, deliberately and repeatedly. Yes, I think he is the only President to lie on the scale that buffoon, I mean Clinton did. I expect there has been similarly broad lying by presdent in the past, but probably on different subjects. I know of no president, other than Clinton, who deliberately and repeatedly lied to the citizens of this county. I know of no president, that when caught with DNA evidence linking him to a crime tried to change the meaning of a word in the English language I know of no ther president, save for perhaps Richard Nixon, who displayed such a lack of integrity as did Clinton. Honu The U-2 spy plane incident during the Eisenhower administration comes to mind. http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/dl/...documents.html |
#345
|
|||
|
|||
39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.
Hertz Dount wrote:
"sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 14:20:29 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: "sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-12 09:33:48 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: I shudder at the thought of an amateur like Obama or a vacilator like Billary gaining office. Somehow, I can't see how any Democrat in the field could possibly be worse than the last few Republicans. Okay, then elect one...you'll see how bad it can be when we turn the country over to terrorists and illegal aliens. I suggest you see your therapist as soon as possible about your paranoia. I have no paranoia. Look at the democratic candidates...none of them are prepared for leading the country in the crisis we find ourselves in! Give me a break; Obama is nothing more than a pretty boy in a suit, and Billary is the Jane Fonda of the 21st century. Neither will have what it takes to stand up to the job. So which of the Reps is any better? -- Lars T. |
#346
|
|||
|
|||
39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.
Yellowbeard wrote:
In previous replies I read where someone was upset about the recent pardon in Washington. I will wait to see who else and how many more get pardonded. Like in Jan 2001--- see link http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pardonchartlst.htm Clinton claimed executive privilege for a subpoena of records back then too. Which one on the list even worked for the Clinton administration? And why couldn't Shrubya wait till Jan 2009? Who is he going to pardon then? Chuck Manson? -- Lars T. |
#347
|
|||
|
|||
39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.
"sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-16 13:00:16 -0400, sechumlib said: I'd hate to have to count the number of presidents who were adulterous. Some that immediately come to mind are Jefferson, Jackson, Harding, FD Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Nixon. Not to mention Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, whom I conveniently forgot. You conveniently forget a lot of things... Honu |
#348
|
|||
|
|||
39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.
"sechumlib" wrote in message ... On 2007-07-16 14:01:10 -0400, "Hertz Dount" said: "Hatunen" wrote in message .. I have seen it said that at one point Warren Harding's secret service men kept Mrs Hardng at bay outside the oval office while the prez hid his mistress, Nan Britton, in a closet. Did he lie about it to the SCOTUS, Congress, and go on National TV and lie to every single person alive in the U.S. at that moment? He wasn't asked by people who just wanted to catch him at something they could persecute him about. In those days, voyeurs didn't go quite as far as they do today and life was (arguably) better in that respect. Now, will you please quit repeating, rerepeating and rererepeating yourself and go back to your hole? So now you are accusing the US of being voyeurs? You are really pathetic... Honu |
#349
|
|||
|
|||
39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.
"Hatunen" wrote in message ... On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:58:32 -1000, "Hertz Dount" wrote: "Hatunen" wrote in message . .. I expect there has been similarly broad lying by presdent in the past, but probably on different subjects. I know of no president, other than Clinton, who deliberately and repeatedly lied to the citizens of this county. I know of no president, that when caught with DNA evidence linking him to a crime tried to change the meaning of a word in the English language I know of no ther president, save for perhaps Richard Nixon, who displayed such a lack of integrity as did Clinton. You are aware, aren't you, that Clinton hasn't been president for some six-plus years now? Isn't it about time you changed dead horses? Why? You flog them when it suits your needs. Clinton will always be a man withour morals, no matter how long it has been since his term of office. Honu |
#350
|
|||
|
|||
39% of Americans believe Bush should be impeached.
"Walt Tucker" wrote in message ... "Hertz Dount" wrote in message news:2qqdnc4U_9Z0IgbbnZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d@hawaiiantel. net... "Hatunen" wrote in message ... On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:57:51 -1000, "Hertz Dount" wrote: "Hatunen" wrote in message m... On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:11:47 -1000, "Hertz Dount" wrote: "Hatunen" wrote in message news:evsl93pcunsc1dkaooq32ue9al5ar73s4l@4ax. com... On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 20:17:27 -0400, sechumlib wrote: On 2007-07-14 17:45:42 -0400, Hatunen said: You're willfully ignoring all attempts to tell you what "impeahc" means. Hatunen, don't you really think your efforts are hopeless? The stuff you're responding to is by people who are determined to show that Clinton was a blackguard, and they accept the very political impeachment by the House as authentic proof that he was guilty. They are going to find him guilty no matter what idiocy, or lack of it, is involved in their reasoning. They are Clinton-haters, pure and simple. The world is full of Clinton-haters and their ilk. They aren't interested in truth, only in spin. I think it's time to start ignoring them. If I believed in a deity, I would pray to him to help me do that. May you be stronger than I am. I don't post with any hope changing the minds of people like that; I do want other readers who may not understand impeachment to get a clue as to what's really meant. Someone told me at lunch today that they were watching Bill Moyers and there were people on the show who represented a serious attempt to impeach Bush. I asked how many Congressman they had on their side? I was told "maybe one". I said, in that case it is NOT a serious attempt to impeach Bush. You have no hope because you think it is perfectly acceptable for a president to lie. Please quote where I said, or implied, any such thing. You think is is perfectly acceptable for a president to be adulterous. No I don't. I only said that Clinton was the first to get a lot of publicity about it. I suspect the Gary Hart affair triggered the press into being less protective. You have no hope because you fail to realize that anyone that would lie on the scale that Clinton did, and do what he did *IN THE WHOTE HOUSE* has no morals at all. None. Yet you continue to perceive him as some kind of Knight in Shining Armor. Do you honestly thing Clinton has been the only president who ever lied while President? You are sijmply too naive for words. All I ask is that you stop spouting legal nonsense. Lied to the SCOTUS, Congress and every citizen of the U.S., intentionally, deliberately and repeatedly. Yes, I think he is the only President to lie on the scale that buffoon, I mean Clinton did. I expect there has been similarly broad lying by presdent in the past, but probably on different subjects. I know of no president, other than Clinton, who deliberately and repeatedly lied to the citizens of this county. I know of no president, that when caught with DNA evidence linking him to a crime tried to change the meaning of a word in the English language I know of no ther president, save for perhaps Richard Nixon, who displayed such a lack of integrity as did Clinton. Honu The U-2 spy plane incident during the Eisenhower administration comes to mind. http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/dl/...documents.html Let's see....one is for National Security and the other is to lie about being an adulterer and a sodomizer. Pathetic that you cannto see the difference. One was to protect the interest of the nation, and the other was to cover up a blowjob. Honu' |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bush performance ratings by Americans polarized by income status | PJ O'Donovan[_1_] | Europe | 9 | March 22nd, 2007 10:24 AM |
BUSH KEEPS AMERICANS FROM TRAVELLING. | Victor Moralez | Europe | 10 | March 13th, 2007 11:12 PM |
Bush chaos: Americans should sue | Carole Allen | Europe | 2 | March 5th, 2005 09:08 AM |
HOW TO UNDERSTAND AMERICANS, AMERICA, AND GEORGE W. BUSH | anonymouse | Europe | 0 | November 5th, 2004 08:57 PM |
Haiti, RCL/CCL, Bush, Bush and Travel/Cruising. | Cruising Chrissy | Caribbean | 1 | February 24th, 2004 01:31 AM |