If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
"MLD" wrote in message ... "Just2Reason" wrote in message ... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...ort-screenings When was the last time an Israeli aircraft or airport has a problem? Passengers don't remove shoes or go through body searches etc. etc. They rely primarily on a short conversation, a couple of questions and profiling. Whatever else they do is essentially non-intrusive and obviously very effective. Why aren't we taking lessons from them ? MLD Years before 9/11, In Frankfurt, 2 Germany army soldiers were stationed at each airport gate, each with a machine gun. I had a bottle in my carry on and they asked me what it was, and had me open the bag while they held their rifles. No messing with them: anything suspicious and two AK47's were pointed at you. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
On Nov 24, 8:11*am, mikeos wrote:
On 24/11/2010 07:49, Al Nakba wrote: No muslims, no terrorists. That was the most stupid and bigoted statement I've read in a long time.- Hide quoted text - was it untruthful? Be honest now.. Yes. Not many of the I.R.A or the Red Army Faction, or The Shining Path, were Muslims. they didn't hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings full of people did they? Are ypu xenophallophilic to muzzies? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
freedom man lol he reads too many comics
"Freedom Man" a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion : ... "Just2Reason" wrote in message ... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...ort-screenings Absolutely. We should not allow the government's terrorism fearmongering to deprive us of our freedoms and privacy. Also such airport screenings, even full body and baggage searches, cannot guarantee safety. Any "terrorist" with half a brain, like the 9/11 conspirators in the Bush administration, can simply use a surface to air missile to take down a plane and then blame it on whomever they want, or claim it was some sort of accident. They did just that to TWA flight 800 over Long Island, NY about 10 years ago. And as with 9/11, their lies, control of the media, and the brainwashed, apathetic Sheeple allowed these murdering warmongers to get away with it. Could the shootdown of flight 800 possibly have been a test to see what they could get away with? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:00:03 +0100, "Runge 125 1/2"
wrote: freedom man lol he reads too many comics "Freedom Man" a écrit dans le message de groupe de discussion : ... "Just2Reason" wrote in message ... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...ort-screenings Absolutely. We should not allow the government's terrorism fearmongering to deprive us of our freedoms and privacy. Also such airport screenings, even full body and baggage searches, cannot guarantee safety. Any "terrorist" with half a brain, like the 9/11 conspirators in the Bush administration, can simply use a surface to air missile to take down a plane and then blame it on whomever they want, or claim it was some sort of accident. They did just that to TWA flight 800 over Long Island, NY about 10 years ago. And as with 9/11, their lies, control of the media, and the brainwashed, apathetic Sheeple allowed these murdering warmongers to get away with it. Could the shootdown of flight 800 possibly have been a test to see what they could get away with? Sad, really sad. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
On Nov 23, 11:49*pm, Al Nakba wrote:
On Nov 23, 1:20*pm, "Freedom Man" wrote: "Al Nakba" wrote in message .... On Nov 22, 11:24 am, "Freedom Man" wrote: "Just2Reason" wrote in message .... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...6-poll-should-... Absolutely. We should not allow the government's terrorism fearmongering to deprive us of our freedoms and privacy. Also such airport screenings, even full body and baggage searches, cannot guarantee safety. Any "terrorist" with half a brain, like the 9/11 conspirators in the Bush administration, can simply use a surface to air missile to take down a plane and then blame it on whomever they want, or claim it was some sort of accident. They did just that to TWA flight 800 over Long Island, NY about 10 years ago. And as with 9/11, their lies, control of the media, and the brainwashed, apathetic Sheeple allowed these murdering warmongers to get away with it. Could the shootdown of flight 800 possibly have been a test to see what they could get away with? -- No muslims, no terrorists. That was the most stupid and bigoted statement I've read in a long time..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - was it untruthful? Be honest now.. Of course it was. hint: Timothy McVeigh. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
On Nov 22, 1:24*pm, "Freedom Man" wrote:
"Just2Reason" wrote in message ... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...6-poll-should-... Absolutely. We should not allow the government's terrorism fearmongering to deprive us of our freedoms and privacy. Also such airport screenings, even full body and baggage searches, cannot guarantee safety. Any "terrorist" with half a brain, like the 9/11 conspirators in the Bush administration, can simply use a surface to air missile to take down a plane and then blame it on whomever they want, or claim it was some sort of accident. They did just that to TWA flight 800 over Long Island, NY about 10 years ago. And as with 9/11, their lies, control of the media, and the brainwashed, apathetic Sheeple allowed these murdering warmongers to get away with it. Could the shootdown of flight 800 possibly have been a test to see what they could get away with? Please notice that the Bill of Rights is now considered "pie in the sky", nice to think that we have, but now considered too expensive and impractical to implement. US voters long ago sold their constitutional rights for a few morsels of bread.. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
On Nov 24, 8:00*am, "MLD" wrote:
"Just2Reason" wrote in message ... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...6-poll-should-... When was the last time an Israeli aircraft or airport has a problem? Passengers don't remove shoes or go through *body searches etc. etc. *They rely primarily on a short conversation, a couple of questions and profiling. Whatever else they do is essentially non-intrusive and obviously very effective. *Why aren't we taking lessons from them? MLD Israelis know the Nazis can just produce a machine that will indiscrimanitely searh while maximizing profit for the police state's economy at large. First of all, acgtually interogating the person takes more time than just pushing them through the body scan, and if US passengers do not like it, they get to have thier body poked at...which, of course, is evenmore intrusive. Faced witht he prosoect of what;s theuse in arguing, passengers will choose the lesser of two evils which takes much less time. In a hurry, then give up some liberty, you can always drive, but it will cost more time. It depends on your salary then as to whihc method is the most econmical. For families not in a hurry, it is obviously the road trip, but if extra money to spare then we save time and fly I guess, but also pay extra in the being poked at deparment as well. Just gives the uinemployed another reason to drive and not to fly, not that the unemployed will buy an airline ticket anyway in most cases. Yet the lower classes would be most sensitive to being poked at. They would not publicly protest, but only breed more inner contempt for a government that is failibng in every way. Can't really balme one guy when the entire corrupt system is agaisnt him, because they have more to lose than to gain. Flying becase a strain on the blood pressure when the TSA came around to be. 9/11 achieved its purpose by the fact that it encouraged and allowed the governemnt to stomp on civil liberties guaranteed by a Bill of Rights which a sitting president did not respect, while the population in paranoia surrendered its cherished liberties. It is at times like these when one truly questions the wisdom of so called democracy. We are disappointed by this administration which only expanded the invasiveness of civil right abuses. We would have expected Mr Obama to be more of a champion for civil liberties by refraining from exercising and/or expaniding policies we elected him to change. I remind him of another disappoiontment: the use of Predator drones, but we do not expect anything different from Clinton who used hellfire missiles on targets within US boundaries. I know my objection to use of Hellfire missiles does not account for anything anyhow. However, once again, I exercise the Jonah function, so that like my countrymen, so GOD does not hold me resposnsible for approving such methods. The preceived prophet is charged to speak those things of conscience which are extremely relevant at the time. Lazarus Cain again: code: Jonah 645 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Should we end the invasive airport screenings?
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 07:22:46 -0800 (PST), Tim Crowley
wrote: On Nov 23, 11:49*pm, Al Nakba wrote: On Nov 23, 1:20*pm, "Freedom Man" wrote: "Al Nakba" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 11:24 am, "Freedom Man" wrote: "Just2Reason" wrote in message ... Poll: Should we end the invasive airport screenings? http://just2reason.newsvine.com/_new...6-poll-should-... Absolutely. We should not allow the government's terrorism fearmongering to deprive us of our freedoms and privacy. Also such airport screenings, even full body and baggage searches, cannot guarantee safety. Any "terrorist" with half a brain, like the 9/11 conspirators in the Bush administration, can simply use a surface to air missile to take down a plane and then blame it on whomever they want, or claim it was some sort of accident. They did just that to TWA flight 800 over Long Island, NY about 10 years ago. And as with 9/11, their lies, control of the media, and the brainwashed, apathetic Sheeple allowed these murdering warmongers to get away with it. Could the shootdown of flight 800 possibly have been a test to see what they could get away with? -- No muslims, no terrorists. That was the most stupid and bigoted statement I've read in a long time.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - was it untruthful? Be honest now.. Of course it was. hint: Timothy McVeigh. Which planes did he bomb? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm sure a lot of people out there agree with me. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Questions re. security screenings | P T | Air travel | 6 | March 23rd, 2008 11:46 PM |
Madrid Barajas Airport Surpass Amsterdam Schiphol Airport as4rd busiest airport | Ulf Kutzner | Europe | 0 | February 21st, 2006 02:10 PM |
Reader Poll: How do you feel about the proposed changes to airport security? | Ablang | Air travel | 1 | August 19th, 2005 07:32 AM |