If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
At Long Last - Media Acknowledgement of 9/11 Alternative Theories
For the longest time, it seemed that the media has been a puppet of
the U.S. government adhering to the official government line on the events of 9/11 with absolutely no acknowledgment of anything that may have deviated from that line. Actually, about two weeks after the 9/11 attacks, Paula Zahn on CNN reported on the French book, entitled something like the _Fantastic Deception_, that claimed that no plane could have attacked the Pentagon on 9/11. She pooh-poohed the people behind the book and their premises to the extent that she made them out to be sacrilegious traitors against the very upstanding [yeah, right] government of the United States of America. Up 'til now, this had been the one and only acknowledgment in the media that something other than what was claimed actually happened on 9/11. Now, finally, there was a front-page article in the Newark _Star Ledger_ (12/29/31) entitled "Conspiracy theories abound in 9/11 probe; panel weighs evidence in sifting for truth." The _Star Ledger_ mentioned the following ideas on 9/11: 1. that President Bush knew that the attacks were coming but allowed them to be executed to support the war on terrorism; 2. that fighter jets were not scrambled on time; 3. that Israel was actually behind the attacks, not Arab terrorists... to justify the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq; 4. that the planes that struck the World Trade Center were remote controlled; 5. that a missile, not a plane, struck the Pentagon; 6. that "we have no authoritative account of how it happened and why it happened;" 7. that many questions remain unanswered; 8. that "concerns about stonewalling and a cover-up have been fueled by the government's 'excessive secrecy,' Bush's initial opposition to the commission [the probe], his delay in turning over White House intelligence briefings..." I have my own idea about 9/11, and I think that it deserves further investigation. There is no doubt in my mind that the Bush family is in disreputable cahoots with jew arch-criminal Marc Rich. When it is said that Marc Rich is a "commodities trader," I do believe that this is just a euphemism for "big time international drug kingpin." As such, Marc Rich would have a great vested interest in reestablishing the heroin trade out of Afghanistan. This was accomplished by waging war in that country. There are, of course, many other ways for the Bush/Rich camp to enrich themselves by waging their bogus war(s) on terrorism. Thus far, nobody but me is trying to draw attention to the Bush-Rich connection. I find it most unfortunate that the commission conducting the probe of 9/11 is headed by former New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean, a George W. Bush appointee. Mr. Kean is little more than - no! - he's a little less than a dim-witted, smiley-faced bobble head... just the type to make a great crony under (and for) the circumstances Jeremy Miller |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
At Long Last - Media Acknowledgement of 9/11 Alternative Theories
Jeremy Miller wrote:
I have my own idea about 9/11, and I think that it deserves further investigation. There is no doubt in my mind that the Bush family is in disreputable cahoots with jew arch-criminal Marc Rich. When it is said that Marc Rich is a "commodities trader," I do believe that this is just a euphemism for "big time international drug kingpin." As such, Marc Rich would have a great vested interest in reestablishing the heroin trade out of Afghanistan. This was accomplished by waging war in that country. There are, of course, many other ways for the Bush/Rich camp to enrich themselves by waging their bogus war(s) on terrorism. You've got the wrong President. Rich was Clinton's buddy that he pardoned on his last day in office. MTV |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
At Long Last - Media Acknowledgement of 9/11 Alternative Theories
"MTV" wrote in message ... Jeremy Miller wrote: I have my own idea about 9/11, and I think that it deserves further investigation. There is no doubt in my mind that the Bush family is in disreputable cahoots with jew arch-criminal Marc Rich. When it is said that Marc Rich is a "commodities trader," I do believe that this is just a euphemism for "big time international drug kingpin." As such, Marc Rich would have a great vested interest in reestablishing the heroin trade out of Afghanistan. This was accomplished by waging war in that country. There are, of course, many other ways for the Bush/Rich camp to enrich themselves by waging their bogus war(s) on terrorism. You've got the wrong President. Rich was Clinton's buddy that he pardoned on his last day in office. MTV Noo.... don't ya see, the black helicopters in his backyard told him that was really Bush in his Clinton disguise... Plus, the Bill Clinton and George Bush don't really exist, they're holograms projected by the Tri-Lateral Commission... Gotta go... someone is coming... grin Jim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
At Long Last - Media Acknowledgement of 9/11 Alternative Theories
MTV wrote in message ...
Jeremy Miller wrote: I have my own idea about 9/11, and I think that it deserves further investigation. There is no doubt in my mind that the Bush family is in disreputable cahoots with jew arch-criminal Marc Rich. When it is said that Marc Rich is a "commodities trader," I do believe that this is just a euphemism for "big time international drug kingpin." As such, Marc Rich would have a great vested interest in reestablishing the heroin trade out of Afghanistan. This was accomplished by waging war in that country. There are, of course, many other ways for the Bush/Rich camp to enrich themselves by waging their bogus war(s) on terrorism. You've got the wrong President. Rich was Clinton's buddy that he pardoned on his last day in office. No, I don't! All indications are that Bush traded immunity from criminal prosecution for Bill Clinton in exchange for the Marc Rich pardon from Clinton. J.M. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
At Long Last - Media Acknowledgement of 9/11 AlternativeTheories
...... That no planes attacked on 9/11.
...... That President Bush knew of the attacks before they happened. What a bunch of liberal crap. You people like living on another planet. Do you wear tin foil hats so the aliens can't read your thoughts? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
At Long Last - Media Acknowledgement of 9/11 Alternative Theories
Jeremy Miller wrote:
1. that President Bush knew that the attacks were coming but allowed them to be executed to support the war on terrorism; plausible. I don't think he woudl have known about specifics of the attacks though. 2. that fighter jets were not scrambled on time; that is a fact. But I guess you wanted to speculate that they had been intentionally not dispatched on time. I don't think so. 3. that Israel was actually behind the attacks, not Arab terrorists... to justify the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq; For such events Israel = USA. There isn't much that Israel does that the USA doesn't (secretely) agree to. 4. that the planes that struck the World Trade Center were remote controlled; That one is very doubtful. 5. that a missile, not a plane, struck the Pentagon; Weren't there sections of a plane's tail visible in the early hours before it was removed ? 6. that "we have no authoritative account of how it happened and why it happened;" One CVR/FDR was recovered. But the authoritines never released transcripts. Yet this is the most important piece of the big picture, especially because it is the plane where the passengers SUPPOSEDLY overpowered the bad guys. Assuming that there was in fact a passenger revolt, knowing how it did happen would be very important, especially since they now expect civilian passengers to help defent aircraft and overtake terrorists in such instances. Perhaps that flight didn't really happen as the media/government made it look, and it would lose the "heroics" aspects if they were to release the tapes. But it would also provide the civilians with a more realistic protrayal of what happens if the passengers try to overtake the terrorists. 7. that many questions remain unanswered; many questions remain unasked. I have my own idea about 9/11, and I think that it deserves further investigation. There is no doubt in my mind that the Bush family is in disreputable cahoots with jew arch-criminal Marc Rich. Bush is just an ex-alchoolic born-again religious stupid puppet. Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz are behind the Bush regimes actions and they succesfully pushed aside Powell, allowing them free reign. Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz don't celebrate Christmas. Cheney Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz are the 3 most dangerous persons in the world right now, worse that Ossama. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
At Long Last - Media Acknowledgement of 9/11 AlternativeTheories
Jo Jo wrote:
What a bunch of liberal crap. Eh? Why do you say "liberal"? Do you equate looney rantings with everything you disagree with? You reckon this guy is a commie supporter of a national health-care plan? Maybe even believes in evolution? Is "liberal" an insult? You people like living on another planet. Do you wear tin foil hats so the aliens can't read your thoughts? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
At Long Last - Media Acknowledgement of 9/11 Alternative Theories
On 31 Dec 2003 06:53:38 -0800, Jeremy Miller wrote:
[SNIP] jew arch-criminal All you need to know that this is just another anti-Semitic kook. Not surprising that he has started threads in alt.politics.nationalism.white and alt.politics.white-power Doug |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
At Long Last - Media Acknowledgement of 9/11 Alternative Theories
nobody wrote:
One CVR/FDR was recovered. But the authoritines never released transcripts. Yet this is the most important piece of the big picture, especially because it is the plane where the passengers SUPPOSEDLY overpowered the bad guys. Assuming that there was in fact a passenger revolt, knowing how it did happen would be very important, especially since they now expect civilian passengers to help defent aircraft and overtake terrorists in such instances. The reason why the transcripts were never released is because they contain (audio) evidense that the plane was either shot at, or hit/dammaged, or hit/brought-down by missle from jet fighter. 1) This was the 1 (one) plane of the 4 that was within range (or flew into range) of scrambled jet fighters. 2) There were reports on 9/11/01 that parts of the plane fell into a small lake where some campers/vacationers were boating. Those reports got wide TV coverage for a few hours but quickly faded as the media was saturated with incoming news stories. 3) Americans could not psycologically stomach the additional tragic idea that the military shot down a civillian plane, and perhaps in the confusion the exact knowledge of this event did not filter down to while-house pr people, but someone decided it's better to let the public believe the plane went down in a blaze of glory rather than a smoking blaze. Cheney Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz are the 3 most dangerous persons in the world right now, worse that Ossama. Those 3 were chosen as the #1 chicken-cannon target by CBC's Air Farce on their new-years eve broadcast. Very well chosen targets. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
At Long Last - Media Acknowledgement of 9/11 Alternative Theories
lest we forget - the order to shoot would have been given over an OPEN air
channel (not normally accessible by civil radios, but available) and wouldhave been MOST CERTAINLY been hear-able by FAA ATC so explain HOW they would have kept this quiet (besides it would have been TAPED) - anyway, it would have not detracted from the events on the Pennsylvania flight AND YES - IT WOULD BEEN A _CLEAR CHANNEL_ TRANSMISSION. "Fly Guy" wrote in message ... nobody wrote: One CVR/FDR was recovered. But the authoritines never released transcripts. Yet this is the most important piece of the big picture, especially because it is the plane where the passengers SUPPOSEDLY overpowered the bad guys. Assuming that there was in fact a passenger revolt, knowing how it did happen would be very important, especially since they now expect civilian passengers to help defent aircraft and overtake terrorists in such instances. The reason why the transcripts were never released is because they contain (audio) evidense that the plane was either shot at, or hit/dammaged, or hit/brought-down by missle from jet fighter. 1) This was the 1 (one) plane of the 4 that was within range (or flew into range) of scrambled jet fighters. 2) There were reports on 9/11/01 that parts of the plane fell into a small lake where some campers/vacationers were boating. Those reports got wide TV coverage for a few hours but quickly faded as the media was saturated with incoming news stories. 3) Americans could not psycologically stomach the additional tragic idea that the military shot down a civillian plane, and perhaps in the confusion the exact knowledge of this event did not filter down to while-house pr people, but someone decided it's better to let the public believe the plane went down in a blaze of glory rather than a smoking blaze. Cheney Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz are the 3 most dangerous persons in the world right now, worse that Ossama. Those 3 were chosen as the #1 chicken-cannon target by CBC's Air Farce on their new-years eve broadcast. Very well chosen targets. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|