If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
MasterCard Will Expand Fees On International Transactions
MasterCard Will Expand Fees
On International Transactions By JENNIFER SARANOW Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL April 20, 2005; Page D2 Using a MasterCard abroad is about to get more expensive for many consumers. MasterCard International Inc. says it plans to charge fees for all card transactions abroad, not just those where it converts to dollars purchases made in a foreign currency. Earlier this month, Visa USA Inc. started levying a 1% fee on every charge made outside a cardholder's country. American Express Co., meanwhile, charges a 2% fee for transactions abroad where currency conversion occurs. MasterCard says that starting Oct. 1, it will charge issuers a fee of 0.8% on all transactions when the card holder and merchant are from different countries. The company also plans to levy an additional 0.2% whenever a merchant's foreign currency needs to be converted. The new fees apply to users of both MasterCard credit and debit cards, and include ATM withdrawals and debit-card purchases. Previously, when someone used a MasterCard or Visa while traveling abroad, the companies added only a 1% fee for purchases that required currency conversions. The banks that issue credit cards would frequently add their own fees, resulting in total currency-conversion charges as high as 3% in some cases. But travelers previously could avoid those fees by shopping at a growing number of foreign merchants that allowed travelers to use their cards to pay in dollars. For example, a car-rental agency in Europe would figure out the cost of a rental in dollars, and charge your card that amount. Merchants, however, charge a fee for doing that. The new MasterCard fees will be charged directly to the issuer and as a result, won't show up on credit-card bills as part of the transaction amount. If the issuers decide to pass along the fees, consumers could face fees from both the merchant and the card issuer for the same transaction if the transaction is done in dollars. Some banks such as J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. are choosing not to pass along the new fees and plan to continue to charge consumers only for purchases where MasterCard converts the currency. However, other issuers, including MBNA Corp., HSBC Holdings PLC and Capital One Financial Corp., plan to begin charging fees for all MasterCard transactions abroad. Write to Jennifer Saranow at 1 URL for this article: http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB1...911559,00.html Hyperlinks in this Article: (1) Copyright 2005 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan Epstein" wrote in message ... MasterCard says that starting Oct. 1, it will charge issuers a fee of 0.8% on all transactions when the card holder and merchant are from different countries. The company also plans to levy an additional 0.2% whenever a merchant's foreign currency needs to be converted. The new fees apply to users of both MasterCard credit and debit cards, and include ATM withdrawals and debit-card purchases. Previously, when someone used a MasterCard or Visa while traveling abroad, the companies added only a 1% fee for purchases that required currency conversions. In other words, the charge will stay the same unless the currency is converted by the retailer at the POS. With the exception, I guess, for people travelling in a foreign country where the currency is the same, eg Euro zone. The banks that issue credit cards would frequently add their own fees, resulting in total currency-conversion charges as high as 3% in some cases. But travelers previously could avoid those fees by shopping at a growing number of foreign merchants that allowed travelers to use their cards to pay in dollars. They avoid one fee and pay another! IME it is significantly more expensive to let the retailer do the currency conversion. For example, a car-rental agency in Europe would figure out the cost of a rental in dollars, and charge your card that amount. Merchants, however, charge a fee for doing that. Yes, and typically more than the bank and MasterCard together would have charged for converting the currency. The new MasterCard fees will be charged directly to the issuer and as a result, won't show up on credit-card bills as part of the transaction amount. If the issuers decide to pass along the fees, consumers could face fees from both the merchant and the card issuer for the same transaction if the transaction is done in dollars. So do the transaction in the local currency. You're probably better off doing this anyway. Many retailers seem to convert the currency without first asking the customer as they are supposed to (since AIUI they get a cut of the currency conversion fee). You don't have to accept this and can demand to be charged in the local currency. ISTM all this is about MasterCard and VISA losing much of their currency conversion markup due to the increased tendancy for retailers to convert the currency at the POS. If these new charges by MasterCard and VISA reduce the rip-off of dynamic currency conversion at the POS, then I'll be happy. -- Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airline Ticket Consolidators and Bucket Shops FAQ | Edward Hasbrouck | Air travel | 0 | April 17th, 2004 12:28 PM |
Airline Ticket Consolidators and Bucket Shops FAQ | Edward Hasbrouck | Air travel | 0 | December 15th, 2003 09:48 AM |
Airline Ticket Consolidators and Bucket Shops FAQ | Edward Hasbrouck | Backpacking and Budget travel | 0 | November 9th, 2003 09:09 AM |
Airline Ticket Consolidators and Bucket Shops FAQ | Edward Hasbrouck | Air travel | 0 | October 10th, 2003 09:44 AM |
Airline Ticket Consolidators and Bucket Shops FAQ | Edward Hasbrouck | Backpacking and Budget travel | 0 | October 10th, 2003 09:44 AM |