hookers in china

On Jan 24, 3:02 am, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 23, 1:53 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD



" wrote:
On Jan 22, 3:59 wrote:

On Jan 21, 9:52 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 21, 6:13 wrote:

On Jan 21, 8:53 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 21, 5:11 wrote:

On Jan 21, 3:06 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 20, 10:53 wrote:

On Jan 21, 12:59 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
RichAsianKid: Chinese are even looked down upon in what is
now China's own territory: Hong Kong. In 2007 it was almost a
healthcare crisis and it made international news: pregnant Chinese
women traipsing across the border to anchor their babies and then
conveniently forgetting to submit required payment! Most Hong Kong'ers
are ethnically Han Chinese themselves.

mainland chinese remind hong kongers about their embarrassing family
tree. sort of like how a city slicker does not like it when his
country bumpkin cousin visits and embarrasses the slicker by reminding
him that he came from a family of spitting monkeys.

"Keep friends close but enemies closer"

of all cultures, only 2 like to deny they evolved from apes:
1) japanese
2) chinese
Americans (except for nutso fundamentalists) believe in evolution and
teach it in schools. CCP does not permit the teaching of evolution
in schools. That's because chinese cannot accept they are
fundamentally just a money who lost his fur and shrunk his penis.

Stripped of the burden of political correctness, evolution and social
darwinism seem way more easily accepted by mainland Chinese or just
about any NorthEast Asians compared to starry-eyed Americans - in fact
Americans are, on this issue, fundamentalist egalitarians. There
cannot be any differences in intelligence between blacks and whites,
and if you even begin to enunciate this fact then you're obviously a
(guess what, tata!) racist and should be banished to the 10th circle
of hell etc etc. Whatever you think of the third world mainland
Chinese they know damn well that if you have a large pigmented
underclass life just won't be the same. You just won't have the same
'harmonious society'. The Japanese and the Koreans also think the
same. The motto? Prevention is the best cure.

doesn't work because china has a large dark skin population, including
darkie han, fukinese (darkies), and mongoose. the only light skin
chinese are the muslims, but the muslims are being bullied by the ccp.

But will China do any better if it imports a huge black/African
population? Seriously? And at what cost?

yes, the blacks will enrich chinas in too many ways to mention.
first, they will organize, speak out, shake up, and bring modern
ideas and democracy to china. second, a few leaders will emerge, such
as MLK and Obama, who will be great political leaders. (have you ever
heard the chinese politburo speakers give a speech? mind numbingly
boring...) Third, the blacks will teach the chinese how to play
basketball so that china can actually become competitive in the
olympics. Fourth, strong black women, such as opera winfry, will
emerge to energize and organize chinese women. Fifth, blacks will
shake up chinese music, develop some chinese rap songs so that chinese
music can become "cool". All in all, blacks will enrich china just
like blacks have greatly enriched america.

Wow, doctor, not the first time but I see you're really a great
defender for the black people aren't you? "Blacks will enrich China
just as like blacks have greatly enriched America." Bwahahaha!! That
shows that you're not (that) Asian - at least no Asian that I know of
would say such a thing - and most likely not an white either - at
least not on libertarian internet. Let me post this for everyone to
see:

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2005/....html?from=top

"How come the United States selects a female chimpanzee as Secretary
of State?"

"This black woman thinks rather a lot of herself."

"She's so ugly she's losing face. Even a dog would be put off its
dinner while she's being fed."

Bwahahahahaa!!!!

If America elects Obama, it makes itself the laughing stock of the
world. America may be too naive to understand that......

Sorry, whatever you think of the CCP, China just doesn't need a crime
wave. Here's a nice PDF reference:

http://amren.com/colorofcrime/color.pdf

And.....get this. Look at Japan. In another article, "Japan therefore
has first-rate opera without Italians, jazz without blacks, heavy
metal without Brits and some of the best "Western" science and
technology without Westerners. What Japan does not have is "honor
killings," voodoo, MS-13, bilingualism or racial tension, and it will
never have these things if it keeps to its current no-immigration
policy."

You can easily absorb influences from afar. You just don't necessarily
want to shack up with them that's all.

Blacks of course would love to migrate and even parasitically hang
onto even a third world country like China. By many measures Africa is
doing even worse off than China. The problem is that the Chinese don't
want to have them on their own territory. I must say that I don't
necessarily blame them based on America's failed experiment.

china has NO SOUL, NO RAP, NO MUSIC, NO BASKETBALL, and NO FUN. china
would be a much happier, enjoyable, open, honest, and democratic
society with 25% black population.

Look at rich japan. They have 3rd rate immitation jazz, 3rd rate
baseball, ridiculous basketball, and unoriginal copycat science.
japan can never be a great country like America because the japanese
marry each other. Inbreeding blocks evolution.

Every biologist knows that genes that mix with a larger genetic pool
is superior.

China will pass. Blacks won't contribute to its 'harmonious society'
mandate. China will be riddled with crime, strife, and racial discord
if it recklessly import 25% blacks. Are you kidding?

Besides there is no strong evidence that mixed race people are
intermediate, and this hybrid vigor myth is precisely that - a myth.
Mixed race children experience a whole slew of problems psychological
problems no found in their monoracial counterparts.

(1) First study (with comments):http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.cu...can/msg/eda565...

(2) Another study:

http://i14.tinypic.com/6kpn2hj.jpg

Reference: Udry JR, Li RM, Hendrickson-Smith J: Health and behavior
risks of adolescents with mixed-race identity. Am J Public Health
2003, 93:1865-1870.

Total sample size: 83,135 + 18,924, based on the National Longitudinal
Study of Adolescent Health from grades 7 through 12 during 1994-1995.

Sample size is therefore HUGE.

Now, look at the results. Can someone tell me why anyone would like to
mix with a black? Look at the GPA scores of the child, especially
between Asian and black. The child's achievements in most cases become
becomes virtually black. Likewise for other groups. Just look at it
yourself if you don't believe me. Here, I type it out for you:

Percentage of children reaching the 75th percentile (if distribution
is average or 'normal' it should be 25%) -- i.e. higher the better:

"Pure"

White - 32.27 Black - 15.45 American Indian - 14.97 Asian 43.16

"Mixed"

White/black 24.19
White/American Indian 27.10
White/Asian 37.58
Black/American Indian 18.79
Black/Asian 18.57
Asian/American Indian 21.82

The above GPAs (grade point average) numbers refer not to
the absolute GPAs themselves but to the percentage of individuals in
the 75th percentile of the entire sample. Thus 25% will be on par as
you would expect 25% of the population to exceed the 75th percentile.
In the case of Asians, 43.16% exceed the 75th percentile. In the case
of Blacks - only 15.45% of them do. Mix the two, and you only have
18.57%, that is, the group performance of an Asian/black mix is CLOSER
to that of black than to the middle ground between the two!!

Also, mixed race children are associated with a number of side effects
from the study. Found this table.

http://i15.tinypic.com/716vjuo.jpg

Numbers quoted are odds ratios (OR), see the table for details for the
OR calculation, with (*) indicating statistical significance at p0.05

You can see that across the board most of the ratios are 1,
indicating that mixed race teens really do experience a lot more
problems such as poor health, waking up tired, being a smoker,
drinker, having sleep problems, depression etc etc compared to their
monoracial counterparts.

your statistics are bogus due to tiny sample size. you don't need to
do studies to see the impact, boy. Just compare mixed-race versus
pure race countries:

1) compare "pure english ladies" to mixed race ladies in southern
calif. who is prettier?
2) compare "pure white southern americans" to "mixed ethnics" in new
york. who has more brith defects and who has higher IQ scores?

if you like your chinese so pure, why don't you go mate with your
sister?

On Jan 24, 1:43*pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
" wrote:
On Jan 23, 9:11 am, rst0wxyz wrote:





On Jan 22, 10:48 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 22, 12:09 pm, KLguy282 wrote:
PRC and HKers may be the same genetice stock , but the PRC have been
raped by the asshole CCP who have systematically removed Chinese
culture from PRC.

Hk however is different as they have retain their culture and can be
said to be true chiense unlike the commie pariahs.

my wife, a native hong konger, says hong kongers do NOT share genetics
with mainlanders.

Hong Kong people mostly came from Guangdong Province, which is next to
Hong Kong, and speak Cantonese. *In 2047, when Hong Kong's 50 years
autonomy ends, I wouldn't be surprised that Hong Kong would be part of
Guangdong Province again.

the key word here is "mostly", pal. *How much are NOT from guangdong?
10%?
Why does china always suppress the minority population??? *And how
many native
islanders intermarry with cantonese, thus spreading the island SEED
wide and clear?

*Northern chinese are from mongolian and ghengis
khan rape sperm. *Hong Kongers share genetics with islanders like
taiwanese, polynesians, and cantonese.

You're contradicting yourself within one sentence, dr ira. *Cantonese
are the people of Guangdong Province, are Mainlanders.

yes, cantonese are mainlanders. *However, they are southerners --
definitely not northerners. *beijing oppressors are northerns. *Are
you going to claim that beijingers and cantonese share common
grandmama? *bwahahahahaha!

grow beyond your proc propaganda, man. *look at the science.
cantonese are more related to ancient cantonese tree monkey than they
are to northern beijing man.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Same genetic stock as in general racial type.

But it is most definitely true that Southerners are the original Han ,
not the present day north who as RAK said are muchul mix monkeys.

The Cantonese are true descendants of the Han / Tang / Ming no doubt
about that , thta's why we call ourselves - " Tong Yen " - people of
the Tang .

You dont hear so called northerners call them selves " Tang ren " do
you .

When the original Han/Canto moved to the South they drove the Yue
( Thai tupe people ) from their homelands and the south ( Yuetnam ..
Vietnam ) and west Yu... nan .

AS conquerors , many lower ranking han officers took Yue women as
concubines , whereas the higher ranks took their own women from the
North with them.

Many Canto are descendant from pure original Han stock , you can
tell , we are the white type like me .

Canto is much closer to original Chinese than Mandarin , which ws
modified to suit the Munchol conquerors.

Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD wrote:
On Jan 24, 3:02 am, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 23, 1:53 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD



" wrote:
On Jan 22, 3:59 wrote:

On Jan 21, 9:52 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 21, 6:13 wrote:

On Jan 21, 8:53 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 21, 5:11 wrote:

On Jan 21, 3:06 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 20, 10:53 wrote:

On Jan 21, 12:59 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
RichAsianKid: Chinese are even looked down upon in what is
now China's own territory: Hong Kong. In 2007 it was almost a
healthcare crisis and it made international news: pregnant Chinese
women traipsing across the border to anchor their babies and then
conveniently forgetting to submit required payment! Most Hong Kong'ers
are ethnically Han Chinese themselves.

mainland chinese remind hong kongers about their embarrassing family
tree. sort of like how a city slicker does not like it when his
country bumpkin cousin visits and embarrasses the slicker by reminding
him that he came from a family of spitting monkeys.

"Keep friends close but enemies closer"

of all cultures, only 2 like to deny they evolved from apes:
1) japanese
2) chinese
Americans (except for nutso fundamentalists) believe in evolution and
teach it in schools. CCP does not permit the teaching of evolution
in schools. That's because chinese cannot accept they are
fundamentally just a money who lost his fur and shrunk his penis.

Stripped of the burden of political correctness, evolution and social
darwinism seem way more easily accepted by mainland Chinese or just
about any NorthEast Asians compared to starry-eyed Americans - in fact
Americans are, on this issue, fundamentalist egalitarians. There
cannot be any differences in intelligence between blacks and whites,
and if you even begin to enunciate this fact then you're obviously a
(guess what, tata!) racist and should be banished to the 10th circle
of hell etc etc. Whatever you think of the third world mainland
Chinese they know damn well that if you have a large pigmented
underclass life just won't be the same. You just won't have the same
'harmonious society'. The Japanese and the Koreans also think the
same. The motto? Prevention is the best cure.

doesn't work because china has a large dark skin population, including
darkie han, fukinese (darkies), and mongoose. the only light skin
chinese are the muslims, but the muslims are being bullied by the ccp.

But will China do any better if it imports a huge black/African
population? Seriously? And at what cost?

yes, the blacks will enrich chinas in too many ways to mention.
first, they will organize, speak out, shake up, and bring modern
ideas and democracy to china. second, a few leaders will emerge, such
as MLK and Obama, who will be great political leaders. (have you ever
heard the chinese politburo speakers give a speech? mind numbingly
boring...) Third, the blacks will teach the chinese how to play
basketball so that china can actually become competitive in the
olympics. Fourth, strong black women, such as opera winfry, will
emerge to energize and organize chinese women. Fifth, blacks will
shake up chinese music, develop some chinese rap songs so that chinese
music can become "cool". All in all, blacks will enrich china just
like blacks have greatly enriched america.

Wow, doctor, not the first time but I see you're really a great
defender for the black people aren't you? "Blacks will enrich China
just as like blacks have greatly enriched America." Bwahahaha!! That
shows that you're not (that) Asian - at least no Asian that I know of
would say such a thing - and most likely not an white either - at
least not on libertarian internet. Let me post this for everyone to
see:

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2005/....html?from=top

"How come the United States selects a female chimpanzee as Secretary
of State?"

"This black woman thinks rather a lot of herself."

"She's so ugly she's losing face. Even a dog would be put off its
dinner while she's being fed."

Bwahahahahaa!!!!

If America elects Obama, it makes itself the laughing stock of the
world. America may be too naive to understand that......

Sorry, whatever you think of the CCP, China just doesn't need a crime
wave. Here's a nice PDF reference:

http://amren.com/colorofcrime/color.pdf

And.....get this. Look at Japan. In another article, "Japan therefore
has first-rate opera without Italians, jazz without blacks, heavy
metal without Brits and some of the best "Western" science and
technology without Westerners. What Japan does not have is "honor
killings," voodoo, MS-13, bilingualism or racial tension, and it will
never have these things if it keeps to its current no-immigration
policy."

You can easily absorb influences from afar. You just don't necessarily
want to shack up with them that's all.

Blacks of course would love to migrate and even parasitically hang
onto even a third world country like China. By many measures Africa is
doing even worse off than China. The problem is that the Chinese don't
want to have them on their own territory. I must say that I don't
necessarily blame them based on America's failed experiment.

china has NO SOUL, NO RAP, NO MUSIC, NO BASKETBALL, and NO FUN. china
would be a much happier, enjoyable, open, honest, and democratic
society with 25% black population.

Look at rich japan. They have 3rd rate immitation jazz, 3rd rate
baseball, ridiculous basketball, and unoriginal copycat science.
japan can never be a great country like America because the japanese
marry each other. Inbreeding blocks evolution.

Every biologist knows that genes that mix with a larger genetic pool
is superior.

China will pass. Blacks won't contribute to its 'harmonious society'
mandate. China will be riddled with crime, strife, and racial discord
if it recklessly import 25% blacks. Are you kidding?

Besides there is no strong evidence that mixed race people are
intermediate, and this hybrid vigor myth is precisely that - a myth.
Mixed race children experience a whole slew of problems psychological
problems no found in their monoracial counterparts.

(1) First study (with comments):http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.cu...can/msg/eda565...

(2) Another study:

http://i14.tinypic.com/6kpn2hj.jpg

Reference: Udry JR, Li RM, Hendrickson-Smith J: Health and behavior
risks of adolescents with mixed-race identity. Am J Public Health
2003, 93:1865-1870.

Total sample size: 83,135 + 18,924, based on the National Longitudinal
Study of Adolescent Health from grades 7 through 12 during 1994-1995.

Sample size is therefore HUGE.

Now, look at the results. Can someone tell me why anyone would like to
mix with a black? Look at the GPA scores of the child, especially
between Asian and black. The child's achievements in most cases become
becomes virtually black. Likewise for other groups. Just look at it
yourself if you don't believe me. Here, I type it out for you:

Percentage of children reaching the 75th percentile (if distribution
is average or 'normal' it should be 25%) -- i.e. higher the better:

"Pure"

White - 32.27 Black - 15.45 American Indian - 14.97 Asian 43.16

"Mixed"

White/black 24.19
White/American Indian 27.10
White/Asian 37.58
Black/American Indian 18.79
Black/Asian 18.57
Asian/American Indian 21.82

The above GPAs (grade point average) numbers refer not to
the absolute GPAs themselves but to the percentage of individuals in
the 75th percentile of the entire sample. Thus 25% will be on par as
you would expect 25% of the population to exceed the 75th percentile.
In the case of Asians, 43.16% exceed the 75th percentile. In the case
of Blacks - only 15.45% of them do. Mix the two, and you only have
18.57%, that is, the group performance of an Asian/black mix is CLOSER
to that of black than to the middle ground between the two!!

Also, mixed race children are associated with a number of side effects
from the study. Found this table.

http://i15.tinypic.com/716vjuo.jpg

Numbers quoted are odds ratios (OR), see the table for details for the
OR calculation, with (*) indicating statistical significance at p0.05

You can see that across the board most of the ratios are 1,
indicating that mixed race teens really do experience a lot more
problems such as poor health, waking up tired, being a smoker,
drinker, having sleep problems, depression etc etc compared to their
monoracial counterparts.

your statistics are bogus due to tiny sample size. you don't need to
do studies to see the impact, boy. Just compare mixed-race versus
pure race countries:

1) compare "pure english ladies" to mixed race ladies in southern
calif. who is prettier?
2) compare "pure white southern americans" to "mixed ethnics" in new
york. who has more brith defects and who has higher IQ scores?

if you like your chinese so pure, why don't you go mate with your
sister?

Are you making fun of yourself here?

Total sample size: 83,135 + 18,924, based on the National Longitudinal
Study of Adolescent Health from grades 7 through 12 during
1994-1995 ... and yet it makes it on CNN when a drug trial of a few
hundred people shows benefit....or is your claim that mixed race
people are 'better' (however you define it) now somehow unfalsifiable?

And you should also ask these questions since you raised them:
(1) Compare pure Swedish blondes to mulatto women. "Who is prettier"
to quote your verbatim?
(2) Compare pure white Icelandics (or pure Japanese) to the mixed race
negroes in South Africa. Which group earns higher IQ scores?

Last, abandon this perception of 'purity' - it is a relative term.
Outsiders see China as 'pure' but there are many tribes and genetic
variations within it etc.

http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v.../5201998a.html

China only appears 'pure' compared to miscegenated US or South America
where even dogs are labelled as racist.

White/black 24.19
White/American Indian 27.10
White/Asian 37.58
Black/American Indian 18.79
Black/Asian 18.57
Asian/American Indian 21.82

you need to control for socio-economic factors. it's well known that
test scores of upper middle class suburban blacks are higher than that
of whites and asians.

are you saying you're smarter than snoop dogg and fiddy cents? if
you're so smart, why do they live in beverley hills mansions and pork
a different blonde every night while you are holed up m'bating in a
dorm room?

On Jan 25, 12:48 am, KLguy282 wrote:
On Jan 24, 1:43 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD



" wrote:
On Jan 23, 9:11 am, rst0wxyz wrote:

On Jan 22, 10:48 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 22, 12:09 pm, KLguy282 wrote:
PRC and HKers may be the same genetice stock , but the PRC have been
raped by the asshole CCP who have systematically removed Chinese
culture from PRC.

Hk however is different as they have retain their culture and can be
said to be true chiense unlike the commie pariahs.

my wife, a native hong konger, says hong kongers do NOT share genetics
with mainlanders.

Hong Kong people mostly came from Guangdong Province, which is next to
Hong Kong, and speak Cantonese. In 2047, when Hong Kong's 50 years
autonomy ends, I wouldn't be surprised that Hong Kong would be part of
Guangdong Province again.

the key word here is "mostly", pal. How much are NOT from guangdong?
10%?
Why does china always suppress the minority population??? And how
many native
islanders intermarry with cantonese, thus spreading the island SEED
wide and clear?

Northern chinese are from mongolian and ghengis
khan rape sperm. Hong Kongers share genetics with islanders like
taiwanese, polynesians, and cantonese.

You're contradicting yourself within one sentence, dr ira. Cantonese
are the people of Guangdong Province, are Mainlanders.

yes, cantonese are mainlanders. However, they are southerners --
definitely not northerners. beijing oppressors are northerns. Are
you going to claim that beijingers and cantonese share common
grandmama? bwahahahahaha!

grow beyond your proc propaganda, man. look at the science.
cantonese are more related to ancient cantonese tree monkey than they
are to northern beijing man.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Same genetic stock as in general racial type.

But it is most definitely true that Southerners are the original Han ,
not the present day north who as RAK said are muchul mix monkeys.

The Cantonese are true descendants of the Han / Tang / Ming no doubt
about that , thta's why we call ourselves - " Tong Yen " - people of
the Tang .

You dont hear so called northerners call them selves " Tang ren " do
you .

When the original Han/Canto moved to the South they drove the Yue
( Thai tupe people ) from their homelands and the south ( Yuetnam ..
Vietnam ) and west Yu... nan .

AS conquerors , many lower ranking han officers took Yue women as
concubines , whereas the higher ranks took their own women from the
North with them.

Many Canto are descendant from pure original Han stock , you can
tell , we are the white type like me .

Canto is much closer to original Chinese than Mandarin , which ws
modified to suit the Munchol conquerors.

yeah, my wife says tong yen are the true chinese, and our daughters
are half tong yen. the northerns are mixture of mongolians, north
koreans, and siberians.

On Jan 25, 12:48*am, KLguy282 wrote:
On Jan 24, 1:43*pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

Same genetic stock as in general racial type.

But it is most definitely true that Southerners are the original Han ,
not the present day north who as RAK said are muchul mix monkeys.

The Cantonese are true descendants of the Han / Tang / Ming no doubt
about that , thta's why we call ourselves - " Tong Yen " - people of
the Tang .

You dont hear so called northerners call them selves " Tang ren " do
you .

When the original Han/Canto moved to the South they drove the Yue
( Thai tupe people ) from their homelands and the south ( Yuetnam ..
Vietnam ) and west Yu... nan .

AS conquerors , many lower ranking han officers took Yue women as
concubines , whereas the higher ranks took their own women from the
North with them.

Many Canto are descendant from pure original Han stock , you can
tell , we are the white type like me .

Canto is much closer to original Chinese than Mandarin , which ws
modified to suit the Munchol conquerors.

The past is the past, and leave the past to the history book. Who
care about "Han ren" or "Tang ren". Today, we call them "Chinese".

On Jan 26, 1:12*am, rst0wxyz wrote:
On Jan 25, 12:48*am, KLguy282 wrote:





On Jan 24, 1:43*pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

Same genetic stock as in general racial type.

But it is most definitely true that Southerners are the original Han ,
not the present day north who as RAK said are muchul mix monkeys.

The Cantonese are true descendants of the Han / Tang / Ming no doubt
about that , thta's why we call ourselves - " Tong Yen " - people of
the Tang .

You dont hear so called northerners call them selves " Tang ren " do
you .

When the original Han/Canto moved to the South they drove the Yue
( Thai tupe people ) from their homelands and the south ( Yuetnam ..
Vietnam ) and west Yu... nan .

AS conquerors , many lower ranking han officers took Yue women as
concubines , whereas the higher ranks took their own women from the
North with them.

Many Canto are descendant from pure original Han stock , you can
tell , we are the white type like me .

Canto is much closer to original Chinese than Mandarin , which ws
modified to suit the Munchol conquerors.

The past is the past, and leave the past to the history book. *Who
care about "Han ren" or "Tang ren". *Today, we call them "Chinese".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

On Jan 25, 4:38*pm, KLguy282 wrote:
On Jan 26, 1:12*am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect *a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

On Jan 25, 11:29 am, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
" wrote:
White/black 24.19
White/American Indian 27.10
White/Asian 37.58
Black/American Indian 18.79
Black/Asian 18.57
Asian/American Indian 21.82

you need to control for socio-economic factors. it's well known that
test scores of upper middle class suburban blacks are higher than that
of whites and asians.


Wrong answer again. Re-read the original link -- third column

http://i14.tinypic.com/6kpn2hj.jpg

Controlling for a college-educated parent, the percentages of students
who score over the 75th percentile are (i.e. higher number the better,
baseline should be 25%):

"Pure" race adolescents:

Asian 60.8%
White - 41.3%
Black 35.39%

Mixed race adolescents:

White/Asian 52.36%
White/Black 39.46%
Black/Asian 35.81%

More importantly, from the SAT, children from black households that
make over $100,000 score LOWER than children from white households
that make less than $10,000. Amazing isn't it?


are you saying you're smarter than snoop dogg and fiddy cents? if
you're so smart, why do they live in beverley hills mansions and pork
a different blonde every night while you are holed up m'bating in a
dorm room?

And if blacks are so smart, how come they are so poor **as a group** -
in fact in virtually every society around the world they do worse off
than the native population be it Canada, be it the UK, be it their
homeland, i.e. Africa? Why is that?

On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:
On Jan 25, 4:38 pm, KLguy282 wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

There is a way to get around that tomorrow though - it's easy - if you
consider your children as an extension of yourself. They're the
receptacle of your genes afterall. So sire a kid with someone outside
your race. Then your children (or grandchildren) will not be a
Chinaman, only 1/2, 1/4 etc. You mentioned you had family members
doing that (interestingly only to whites, and not to blacks, but who
can blame them, right? For Asians if they outmarry whites are the most
desirable, while blacks the least). Their kids and grandkids will not
be considered Chinaman. So there is always hope.