hookers in china

On Jan 25, 11:00*pm, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:46 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
There'll never be a black leader in China's lifetime.

How long is "China's lifetime", RAT? 60 years? 5,000 years? or a
million years?


(Not to insult some posters' intelligence here [not referring to you,
doctor] but I mean the above as precisely penned.)

On Jan 26, 2:09 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:00 pm, RichAsianKid wrote:

On Jan 25, 11:46 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
There'll never be a black leader in China's lifetime.

How long is "China's lifetime", RAT? 60 years? 5,000 years? or a
million years?



Tsk tsk tsk, you really didn't get it rst0wxyz, did you?

The day when China gets a black leader is the day when China ceases to
be China.

On Jan 25, 10:46 pm, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:53 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD



" wrote:
Asian 60.8%
White - 41.3%
Black 35.39%

IQ is not everything, one dimensional kid.
If they measure in athletic ability:
Asian = 1%
White = 41%
Black = 94%

Social awareness, popularity:
Asian = negative 98%
White = 15%
Black = 75%

Popular Music ability:
Asian = 4%
White = 25%
Black = 80%

Ability to woo babes:
Asian = 0%
White = 5%
Black = 92%

Leadership/Political ability:
Asian = 1%
White = 10%
Black = 98%

Acting ability and Fun to chat with:
Asian = -25%
White = 0%
Black = +35%

Fake numbers! You know how we know this, doctor? There are negative
numbers here! And if you insist that these numbers are not fake, then
please kindly provide a reference for all of us. I've posted my
reference above for my numbers, as well as the table. Which journal
are these numbers published in? What table? In *.jpg please. Come on,
your credibility is at stake here!

Also, one very important point here. Note that Dr. Humperdink is
telling us that blacks outscore Asians in all these indices. Well,
look closer. Blacks *also* outscore whites in precisely all these
indices. No white internet poster (especially with their libertarian
bent, as those are the typical demographic on the internet) will ever
be afflicted with such self-flagellating hatred.

It seems that our resident doctor (pun intended!) is now stuck in a
position where he has to defend not only just how blacks are doing
better than Asians, but also doing better than whites. I'm sure we'll
all look forward to that.

PS - perhaps inadvertently he may also have confirmed the so-called r-
K theory in biology where blacks and Asians reside on opposite ends of
the spectrum on a whole range of biological indices. Perhaps that's
why he's a doctor afterall. Bwahahahahahaaaaaaa!!!!!

no matter what you say, my numbers are TRUE. blacks are superior to
asians on so many dimensions. white americans, and most asian
americans, admire more blacks heros than asian heros.

Yes, blacks do worse off than native Americans. Check out this from
the reputable Journal of Black Higher Education. On the 2005 SAT:

http://www.jbhe.com/images/issue49/c...ions_test1.gif

Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
SAT-M + SAT-V.

the ONLY activity asians can claim superiority is test-taking and
saving money. blacks are superior in culture, music, sports,
politics, scoring with babes, looks, HAPPINESS, and being americans.

Yes, African Americans score LOWEST out of ALL major ethnic groups in
SAT-M + SAT-V.

Tough, huh?

you are right, mr. one-trick pony. chinese are master test-takers.
unfortunately, that's ALL chinese can do well. if it does not involve
a written test, chinese can't do it! the joke is, chinese get A+ on
the driving test, but they are the worst drivers in america....
bwaaaaahahahahaha!

On Jan 25, 11:00 pm, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:46 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD



" wrote:
On Jan 25, 6:28 wrote:

On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:

On Jan 25, 4:38 pm, KLguy282 wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

There is a way to get around that tomorrow though - it's easy - if you
consider your children as an extension of yourself. They're the
receptacle of your genes afterall. So sire a kid with someone outside
your race. Then your children (or grandchildren) will not be a
Chinaman, only 1/2, 1/4 etc. You mentioned you had family members
doing that (interestingly only to whites, and not to blacks, but who
can blame them, right? For Asians if they outmarry whites are the most
desirable, while blacks the least). Their kids and grandkids will not
be considered Chinaman. So there is always hope.

there's going to be a blackpresidentsoon, if not in 09, then in
2013. there's already a black secretary of state. there will never
be a chinamanpresidentin our lifetimes. probably in our grandkid's
lifetimes.

There'll never be a black leader in China's lifetime.

(Not to insult some posters' intelligence here [not referring to you,
doctor] but I mean the above as precisely penned.)

you can even read. I was not talking president of china; i'm talking
about president of USA.
1) china doesn't even have a chinese president -- china has NO
legitimate president; it's a CCP unelected dictatorship.
2) USA will soon, if not this year, within 10 years, have black
president, hispanic president, and female president. but it will not
have an chinese-american president. this reflects that inside USA,
chinese has the lowest pecking order, below blacks, hispanics, and
native americans, bwaaaahahahaha.

On Jan 25, 10:50 pm, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:44 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD



" wrote:
On Jan 25, 6:28 wrote:

On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:

On Jan 25, 4:38 pm, KLguy282 wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

There is a way to get around that tomorrow though - it's easy - if you
consider your children as an extension of yourself. They're the
receptacle of your genes afterall. So sire a kid with someone outside
your race. Then your children (or grandchildren) will not be a
Chinaman, only 1/2, 1/4 etc. You mentioned you had family members
doing that (interestingly only to whites, and not to blacks, but who
can blame them, right? For Asians if they outmarry whites are the most
desirable, while blacks the least). Their kids and grandkids will not
be considered Chinaman. So there is always hope.

no, one drop of chinaman blood makes your who chain chinaman. one
drop.

Oh really?????!!!!!! Wow!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm shocked, shocked shocked!!!!!
You're now proposing that if a Chinaman marries a black, then their
offspring will become a Chinaman????????

Didn't you just concede to everyone here the ultra-potency of
Chinaman's blood?

potent as smell of skunk. that's why blacks and white with a few
drops of chinese blood in their family tree always try to hide this
fact and pretend they are pure black or pure white, or mixed white/
black/hispanic, hee hee. fortunately, my daughters can pass for dark-
skin white or hispanic easily.

On Jan 26, 12:14*am, RichAsianKid wrote:
On Jan 26, 2:09 am, rst0wxyz wrote:

On Jan 25, 11:00 pm, RichAsianKid wrote:

On Jan 25, 11:46 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
There'll never be a black leader in China's lifetime.

How long is "China's lifetime", RAT? 60 years? 5,000 years? or a
million years?

Tsk tsk tsk, you really didn't get it rst0wxyz, did you?

The day when China gets a black leader is the day when China ceases to
be China.

RAT, you really don't know anything about China. How can China have a
black leader or a white leader when China is and was such a racially
biased nation?

On Jan 26, 1:54 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:
On Jan 26, 12:14 wrote:

On Jan 26, 2:09 am, rst0wxyz wrote:

On Jan 25, 11:00 wrote:

On Jan 25, 11:46 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
There'll never be a black leader in China's lifetime.

How long is "China's lifetime", RAT? 60 years? 5,000 years? or a
million years?

Tsk tsk tsk, you really didn't get it rst0wxyz, did you?

The day when China gets a black leader is the day when China ceases to
be China.

RAT, you really don't know anything about China. How can China have a
black leader or a white leader when China is and was such a racially
biased nation?

Perhaps that's one of the reasons why China's been around for
thousands of years. I repeat: "there'll never be a black leader in
China's lifetime."

On Jan 26, 12:50 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD
" wrote:
On Jan 25, 10:50 wrote:



On Jan 25, 11:44 pm, "Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD

" wrote:
On Jan 25, 6:28 wrote:

On Jan 25, 7:42 pm, rst0wxyz wrote:

On Jan 25, 4:38 pm, KLguy282 wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:12 am, rst0wxyz wrote:
the past determines the present which determines the future.

He who who knows where comes from knows where he is going and what he
doing right now.

Then again I would NOT expect a CULTURELESS BRAINWASHED CCP PARIAH
to understand that .

Tong yen is who we are , is who we were and who we will be .

I am not trying to convince you , you do what you want , if you "
manlanders " want to be different to us , no problem at all.

A Chinaman is a Chinaman, today, yesterday, and tomorrow. No way to
get around it.

There is a way to get around that tomorrow though - it's easy - if you
consider your children as an extension of yourself. They're the
receptacle of your genes afterall. So sire a kid with someone outside
your race. Then your children (or grandchildren) will not be a
Chinaman, only 1/2, 1/4 etc. You mentioned you had family members
doing that (interestingly only to whites, and not to blacks, but who
can blame them, right? For Asians if they outmarry whites are the most
desirable, while blacks the least). Their kids and grandkids will not
be considered Chinaman. So there is always hope.

no, one drop of chinaman blood makes your who chain chinaman. one
drop.

Oh really?????!!!!!! Wow!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm shocked, shocked shocked!!!!!
You're now proposing that if a Chinaman marries a black, then their
offspring will become a Chinaman????????

Didn't you just concede to everyone here the ultra-potency of
Chinaman's blood?

potent as smell of skunk. that's why blacks and white with a few
drops of chinese blood in their family tree always try to hide this
fact and pretend they are pure black or pure white, or mixed white/
black/hispanic, hee hee. fortunately, my daughters can pass for dark-
skin white or hispanic easily.

You wrote: "no, one drop of chinaman blood makes your who chain
chinaman." and now people are trying to hide this. How many blacks/
hispanics/whites are contaminated by chinaman's blood and are actually
chinaman (much like closet Jews)? Do you think there are more than 1.3
billion Chinese?