|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#91
December 12th, 2003, 10:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Detained at the whim of the president
Oh i get it..it is in the cooking group because the mention of turkey..am i
right? Wait, wait, don't tell me I'm the big winner today..!!tears of joy.. Where do i pick up my onion prize? -- Laura "Rick" wrote in message ... "Nomen Nescio" wrote in message ... Kudos to Turkey whose government acted according to the population's wishes despite huge sums of money offered by the USA. Let's be accurate here. Colon Powell didn't spend eight months flying around the world offering money to foreign countries if they supported our invasion of Iraq. He spent eight months flying around the world threatening foreign countries with dire economic consequences if they didn't support it. That is an established fact. The most recent consequence was announced just yesterday: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepu...211iraq11.html Not only was Bush wrong about Iraq, now he's punishing the countries who were right. Absolutely outrageous. The man needs a swift boot upside his amoral head. Rick 
|
|
#92
December 12th, 2003, 10:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Detained at the whim of the president
This really has nothing to do with air travel. Another discussion group
would be appropriate.
|
|
#94
December 12th, 2003, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Detained at the whim of the president
"Nomen Nescio" wrote in message ...
Hey, you mother****ing asshole, why don't you try HARDER at being accurate ... I didn't post that, Mezei the Canadian Troll did. Pay more attention next time and be more careful with your attributions. Er, sorry. Sheesh. What moron puts complete headers in message bodies anyway? Rick
|
|
#95
December 12th, 2003, 11:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Detained at the whim of the president
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:36:32 +1000, Craig Welch
wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:30:40 GMT, john wrote: Cut the crap! The coalition is the US and England. Who else supplied troops? Australia. Are you so isolated from fact that you don't even know that? So hidden in your insular little world? How many troops did Australia supply? 10? 20? 100? Mabe you can tell me how many troops were supplied by the following coalition countries: Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom and Uzbekistan. I doubt if you will have to take your shoes off to count over 10. The fact of the matter is that the US and Great Britain supplied 99% of the troops in Iraq.
|
|
#96
December 13th, 2003, 12:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Detained at the whim of the president
"john" wrote in message ... On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:36:32 +1000, Craig Welch wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:30:40 GMT, john wrote: Cut the crap! The coalition is the US and England. Who else supplied troops? Australia. Are you so isolated from fact that you don't even know that? So hidden in your insular little world? How many troops did Australia supply? 10? 20? 100? Mabe you can tell me how many troops were supplied by the following coalition countries: Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom and Uzbekistan. I doubt if you will have to take your shoes off to count over 10. The fact of the matter is that the US and Great Britain supplied 99% of the troops in Iraq. Do we Australians have to be forever grateful that we supported the US, you retard.? A simple "thanks for your help" would have done. Read up on the population of Aust, and our current military commitments, before you mouth off on something you obviously know nothing about.
|
|
#97
December 13th, 2003, 01:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Detained at the whim of the president
"Sunny" wrote in
: The fact of the matter is that the US and Great Britain supplied 99% of the troops in Iraq. Do we Australians have to be forever grateful that we supported the US, you retard.? A simple "thanks for your help" would have done. Read up on the population of Aust, and our current military commitments, before you mouth off on something you obviously know nothing about. Welcome to Canada's private hell mate. Imagine having to live next to them. Then make it ten times worse...that's about what it's like. And they have the unmitigated gall to call *us* arrogant... -- "The problem with the French is they have no word for entrepreneur." attributed to George W. Bush by Tony Blair via Baroness Williams
|
|
#98
December 13th, 2003, 04:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Detained at the whim of the president
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:18:19 GMT, "Sunny"
wrote: "john" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:36:32 +1000, Craig Welch wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:30:40 GMT, john wrote: Cut the crap! The coalition is the US and England. Who else supplied troops? Australia. Are you so isolated from fact that you don't even know that? So hidden in your insular little world? How many troops did Australia supply? 10? 20? 100? Mabe you can tell me how many troops were supplied by the following coalition countries: Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom and Uzbekistan. I doubt if you will have to take your shoes off to count over 10. The fact of the matter is that the US and Great Britain supplied 99% of the troops in Iraq. Do we Australians have to be forever grateful that we supported the US, you retard.? A simple "thanks for your help" would have done. Read up on the population of Aust, and our current military commitments, before you mouth off on something you obviously know nothing about. Alright, asshole, please tell us how many Australian troops were engaged in combat in Iraq. Tell us the number of troops and what percentage of the total number of combat troops were Australian. Oh, by the way, what part of Iraq were the Australian troops fighting in?
|
|
#99
December 13th, 2003, 05:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Detained at the whim of the president
Detained at the whim of the president Group: rec.travel.air Date: Thu, Dec 11, 2003, 3:54am (CST-2) From: (Polybus) If Guantanamo is any indication of how American government works;... I believe I'd probably rather be living on the other side of the fence in Cuba . -------------------------------------------- . Bye !
|
|
#100
December 13th, 2003, 05:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Detained at the whim of the president
"Jarg" wrote:
And you have to use insult when your arguement is weak. Weak? The denial of Geneva Convention rights is a weak argument? Not a chance. You just cannot defend the indefensible so you try to avoid the issue. Bush and his puppeteers are committing war crimes in Guantanemo Bay. Hopefully they will someday be brought to trial. -- Stephen There were no weapons of mass destruction, just words of mass deception.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VOTE: Shrub in 04 | None | Air travel | 40 | December 4th, 2003 08:39 PM |
| One in nine police in UK will be protecting George Bush | Meghan Powers | Air travel | 24 | November 21st, 2003 02:51 PM |
Linear Mode
