If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Time to stop flying?
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 07:42:34 +0100, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 04:51:20 on Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Mxsmanic remarked: they're ****. Just a set of $10 headphones with an extra twenty cents worth of foam on each side. The impressive part about bose company is that they sell them for hundreds of dollars. There's one born every minute. You're saying that they sell noise-cancelling headphones that don't actually contain any form of active noise cancellation? Active noise cancellation is rubbish too. I bought a set, and while they did reduce the background "throbbing" noise from the engines slightly, they don't have any effect on "random" noises like people talking or announcements (the latter a particular problem on some trains, rather than planes). I find in-ear phones very efective (yes, I know some people don't like them - you can't please everyone). I have a pair of ER-6i's[1] and find they cut out almost all the noise around me. You still get vibration from coming up through the seat, and I wouldn't recommend eating while wearing them (the sound's disgusting!) but the lower noise floor means you don't risk deafening yourself since you can keep the volume turned down low and still hear all the music. Only problem is, you miss all the in-flight anouncements. One day I'll look up and be the only person left in an abandoned plane :-) [1] Other brands are available -- .................................................. ......................... .. never trust a man who, when left alone ...... Pete Lynch . .. in a room with a tea cosy ...... Marlow, England . .. doesn't try it on (Billy Connolly) ..................................... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Time to stop flying?
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:51:20 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: AZ Nomad writes: they're ****. Just a set of $10 headphones with an extra twenty cents worth of foam on each side. The impressive part about bose company is that they sell them for hundreds of dollars. There's one born every minute. You're saying that they sell noise-cancelling headphones that don't actually contain any form of active noise cancellation? Hi Actually I have a pair with no active noise cancellation, which work surprisingly well for the price (a fraction of the cost of Bose - and a lot more compact). Basically, they are a pair of earplugs (they block the ear channel completely) with speakers down the middle. Whilst probably not Hi-Fi, the sound quality is amazingly good. I recently used them on a flight from Heathrow to Buenos Aires (and back) and, whilst not being perfect, I was favourably impressed with how much extraneous noise they cut out. Certainly with even quiet music at low volume on my MP3 player, they cut out virtually all cabin noise. They even have an adaptor plug to fit the phone socket on the seat arm, but I didn't actually try that so cannot comment on how effective that was. Regards KGB |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Time to stop flying?
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... JohnT writes: In the UK/Europe? The FAA and FCC have jurisdiction only in the U.S. Precisely. You posted a claim of FAA/FCC jurisdiction to a UK Newsgroup. -- JohnT |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Time to stop flying?
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... AZ Nomad writes: they're ****. Just a set of $10 headphones with an extra twenty cents worth of foam on each side. The impressive part about bose company is that they sell them for hundreds of dollars. There's one born every minute. You're saying that they sell noise-cancelling headphones that don't actually contain any form of active noise cancellation? Active noise cancelling is rubbish. Passive noise cancelling is as effective. -- William Black I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Time to stop flying?
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... AZ Nomad writes: they're ****. Just a set of $10 headphones with an extra twenty cents worth of foam on each side. The impressive part about bose company is that they sell them for hundreds of dollars. There's one born every minute. You're saying that they sell noise-cancelling headphones that don't actually contain any form of active noise cancellation? Lots of people do. Most mobile phones have passive noise cancelling. -- William Black I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Time to stop flying?
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 08:53:24 on Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Erick T. Barkhuis -o-m remarked: What will make me happy is [...] the ability to use my camera-phone to take pictures out of the window. Wouldn't any ol' camera do? Travelling by plane is bad enough without carrying an excessive number of "gadgets", when you have one already. You put a camera in your hold baggage? How many have you had stolen this year? -- William Black I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Time to stop flying?
In message , at 08:00:26 on Tue, 8 Apr
2008, Peter Lynch remarked: Active noise cancellation is rubbish too. I bought a set, and while they did reduce the background "throbbing" noise from the engines slightly, they don't have any effect on "random" noises like people talking or announcements (the latter a particular problem on some trains, rather than planes). I find in-ear phones very efective (yes, I know some people don't like them - you can't please everyone). I have a pair of ER-6i's[1] The ones I had were in-ear. Panasonic RP-HC50. Rubbish. Like the reviewer here, I paid about £40 which wasn't cheap. He also reports they only work for constant humming, not incidental noises. http://www.ciao.co.uk/Panasonic_RPHC50__Review_5490515 and find they cut out almost all the noise around me. You still get vibration from coming up through the seat, and I wouldn't recommend eating while wearing them (the sound's disgusting!) but the lower noise floor means you don't risk deafening yourself since you can keep the volume turned down low and still hear all the music. -- Roland Perry |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Time to stop flying?
In message , at 10:25:05 on Tue,
8 Apr 2008, William Black remarked: What will make me happy is [...] the ability to use my camera-phone to take pictures out of the window. Wouldn't any ol' camera do? Travelling by plane is bad enough without carrying an excessive number of "gadgets", when you have one already. You put a camera in your hold baggage? No, I don't take a separate camera because I have camera-phone. How many have you had stolen this year? Do keep up - I'm proposing taking the photos out of the *cabin* window. -- Roland Perry |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Time to stop flying?
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 08:00:26 on Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Peter Lynch remarked: Active noise cancellation is rubbish too. I bought a set, and while they did reduce the background "throbbing" noise from the engines slightly, they don't have any effect on "random" noises like people talking or announcements (the latter a particular problem on some trains, rather than planes). I find in-ear phones very efective (yes, I know some people don't like them - you can't please everyone). I have a pair of ER-6i's[1] The ones I had were in-ear. Panasonic RP-HC50. Rubbish. Like the reviewer here, I paid about £40 which wasn't cheap. Don't the Bose ones have an extra zero on the price. Perhaps that makes them wok better tim |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Time to stop flying?
In message , at 12:29:38 on Tue, 8
Apr 2008, "tim (not at home)" remarked: The ones I had were in-ear. Panasonic RP-HC50. Rubbish. Like the reviewer here, I paid about £40 which wasn't cheap. Don't the Bose ones have an extra zero on the price. Perhaps that makes them wok better A Lear Jet probably "works better" too. I don't have that kind of money. -- Roland Perry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air lines flying non-stop/direct between two airports | Rowen[_2_] | Air travel | 0 | August 16th, 2007 01:28 AM |
PRESS RELEASE: CONTINENTAL TO STOP FLYING IN RAIN | [email protected] | Air travel | 8 | April 20th, 2007 09:20 AM |
Flying Time SYD-AUK | A Mate | Australia & New Zealand | 0 | May 24th, 2005 11:24 AM |
So Cal Fires Ground Stop if flying to Southern California | Linsifer | Cruises | 5 | October 28th, 2003 01:05 AM |
Ground Stop if flying to Southern California | Mike Cordelli | Cruises | 6 | October 27th, 2003 09:10 PM |